Enhancement of Catalytic Activity via Inevitable Reconstruction of the Ni–Mo Interface for Alkaline Hydrogen Oxidation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The inevitable oxidation of nickel‐metal‐based catalysts exposed to the air will lead to instability and poor reproducibility of a catalytic interface, which is usually ignored and greatly hinders their application for the catalysis of alkaline hydrogen oxidation. The details on the formation of a world‐class nickel‐based HOR catalyst Ni 3 ‐MoO x /C‐500 are reported via an interfacial reconstruction triggered by passive oxidation upon air exposure. Interfacial reconstruction, initiated with various Ni–Mo metal ratios and annealing temperature, can fine‐tune the Ni–Mo interface with an increased work function and a reduced d‐band center. The optimized Ni 3 ‐MoO x /C exhibits a record high mass activity of 102.8 mA mg Ni −1 , a top‐level exchange current density of 76.5 µA cm Ni −2 , and exceptional resistance to CO poisoning at 1000 ppm CO for hours. The catalyzed alkaline exchange membrane fuel cell exhibits a maximum power output of 600 mW cm −2 and excellent stability, ranking it as one of the most active non‐precious metals HOR catalysts to date.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Chemical Power Sources (SKL‐ACPS) School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Center of Advanced Electrochemical Energy (CAEE) Institute of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies Chongqing University Chongqing 400044 China
Funding
Key Technologies Research and Development Program · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C3EE43899F10.1039/C3EE43899F ↗
2. 10.1038/nature1111510.1038/nature11115 ↗
3. Zhang Q. · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 55 · 468
4. 10.1039/C7TA08718G10.1039/C7TA08718G ↗
5. 10.1039/C8SE00261D10.1039/C8SE00261D ↗
6. 10.1038/nature0511810.1038/nature05118 ↗
7. Sheng W. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2010 · 11 · 157
8. 10.1002/smll.20230725210.1002/smll.202307252 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.3c0690310.1021/jacs.3c06903 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20220804010.1002/anie.202208040 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41929-022-00862-810.1038/s41929-022-00862-8 ↗
12. 10.1002/sstr.20220028110.1002/sstr.202200281 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-024-45370-410.1038/s41467-024-45370-4 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-020-19413-510.1038/s41467-020-19413-5 ↗
15. 10.1039/D3EE01768K10.1039/D3EE01768K ↗
16. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13489210.1016/j.electacta.2019.134892 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2024.14391210.1016/j.electacta.2024.143912 ↗
18. 10.1002/smll.20220619610.1002/smll.202206196 ↗
19. 10.1039/D4QI00103F10.1039/D4QI00103F ↗
20. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0109710.1021/acscatal.9b01097 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41570-021-00340-y10.1038/s41570-021-00340-y ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20211069910.1002/adma.202110699 ↗
23. 10.1039/b800672e10.1039/b800672e ↗
24. 10.1016/j.pecs.2020.10084210.1016/j.pecs.2020.100842 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.211988311910.1073/pnas.2119883119 ↗
26. 10.1039/D0TA06375D10.1039/D0TA06375D ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0515710.1021/acsnano.9b05157 ↗
28. 10.1002/cjoc.20200020510.1002/cjoc.202000205 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.19.291910.1103/PhysRevB.19.2919 ↗
30. 10.1088/0305-4608/18/11/00110.1088/0305-4608/18/11/001 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11244-013-0159-210.1007/s11244-013-0159-2 ↗
32. Hammer B. · 2000 · 71
33. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.10.01010.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.10.010 ↗
34. 10.1107/S090904950501271910.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
35. 10.1039/C5NR08420B10.1039/C5NR08420B ↗