Waste‐To‐Energy: Sustainable Triboelectric Stimulating System Constructed by Bone Gelatin Based Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Crop Growth
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The misuse of synthetic chemicals such as pesticides and fertilizers harms the environment and human health. Abandoning them risks global food shortages. Urgent eco‐friendly alternatives are needed for food production without excessive synthetic chemicals. To respond to this challenge, an innovative approach uses POSS polymer (PA) to modify waste bone gelatin (BG), constructinging a biodegradable triboelectric nanogenerator (PAG‐TENG) tailored for the triboelectric stimulating system for seed germination (PTSS). Amide groups of PA improve the electron supplying capacity of BG and 3D cage structure captures and transfers charges of BG, thereby improving the output performance of PAG‐TENG. The spatial electrostatic field formed by PAG‐TENG promotes seed germination when subjected to pressure changes in the environment. Hence output performance of PAG‐TENG is improved from 52.34 V and 40.25 nA to 247.15 V and 482.12 nA, the sensitivity is 14.4957 V*kPa −1 . It maintains initial stable performance after the 6000 cycles of testing. Besides, the prepared PAG‐TENG has good toughness, translucency, and degradability. Treated by the high voltage electrostatic field of PTSS, peas' germination rate remarkably increased by ≈27%. This work realizes the high‐value utilization of waste resource BG, and provides a novel direction for the development of intelligent agriculture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering Shaanxi University of Science and Technology Xi'an 710021 China
Xi'an Key Laboratory of Green Chemicals and Functional Materials Xi'an 710021 China
National Demonstration Center for Experimental Light Chemistry Engineering Education Shaanxi University of Science and Technology Xi'an 710021 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. R.Vos N.Minot B.Rice GNAF Crises 2021 Global Report on Food Crises September2021.
2. 10.18520/cs/v115/i10/1876-188310.18520/cs/v115/i10/1876-1883 ↗
3. A.Sarkozi Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Roma Italy2019.
4. 10.1186/s12951-024-02371-110.1186/s12951-024-02371-1 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.13480910.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134809 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.10749710.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107497 ↗
7. 10.1038/211303a010.1038/211303a0 ↗
8. 10.1109/TPS.2022.315893110.1109/TPS.2022.3158931 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.01810.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.018 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.00710.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.007 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.elstat.2008.04.00210.1016/j.elstat.2008.04.002 ↗
12. Li M. · Can. J. Plant. Sci. · 2017 · 98 · 93
13. 10.1002/smll.20231193010.1002/smll.202311930 ↗
14. 10.1038/s43016-021-00449-910.1038/s43016-021-00449-9 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10486310.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104863 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10757810.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107578 ↗
17. 10.1002/admt.20210012410.1002/admt.202100124 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-019-13166-610.1038/s41467-019-13166-6 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.10079810.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100798 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20230480910.1002/adfm.202304809 ↗
21. 10.1039/D3TA01763J10.1039/D3TA01763J ↗
22. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11705510.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117055 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.3c1724110.1021/acsami.3c17241 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10758910.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107589 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13739310.1016/j.cej.2022.137393 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10476710.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104767 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.1c1655710.1021/acsami.1c16557 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20231506910.1002/adfm.202315069 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10821110.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108211 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12594810.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125948 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.12961910.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129619 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12582910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125829 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.06810.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.068 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10823110.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108231 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.04810.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.048 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.09310.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.093 ↗
37. 10.1002/smll.20240176210.1002/smll.202401762 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12054610.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120546 ↗
39. 10.1002/adfm.20220522210.1002/adfm.202205222 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0153010.1021/acsenergylett.4c01530 ↗
41. 10.1021/jacs.0c0773210.1021/jacs.0c07732 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.11043610.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110436 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12963910.1016/j.cej.2021.129639 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.11.00710.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.11.007 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14707110.1016/j.cej.2023.147071 ↗
46. 10.1002/adfm.20240482410.1002/adfm.202404824 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10643010.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106430 ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20220989510.1002/adma.202209895 ↗
49. 10.1002/adma.20140206410.1002/adma.201402064 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13253210.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132532 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.10989910.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109899 ↗
52. 10.1002/pssa.20210016110.1002/pssa.202100161 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13615010.1016/j.cej.2022.136150 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0045810.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00458 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e0084710.1016/j.susmat.2024.e00847 ↗
56. 10.1002/adfm.20240027710.1002/adfm.202400277 ↗
57. 10.1002/adfm.20211224110.1002/adfm.202112241 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.02910.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.029 ↗
59. Ince‐Yilmaz O. · Feb‐Fresenius Environ. Bull. · 2018 · 5153
60. 10.3390/agronomy1406123510.3390/agronomy14061235 ↗
61. 10.3390/plants1116218110.3390/plants11162181 ↗