Boosting Bulk Oxygen Transport with Accessible Electrode Nanostructure in Low Pt Loading PEMFCs
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Despite the high potential for reducing carbon emissions and contributing to the future of energy utilization, polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) face challenges such as high costs and sluggish oxygen transport in cathode catalyst layers (CCLs). In this study, the impact of pore size distribution on bulk oxygen transport behavior is explored by introducing nano calcium carbonate of varying particle sizes for pore‐forming. Physicochemical characterizations for are employed to examine the electrode structure, while in situ electrochemical measurements are used to scrutinize bulk oxygen transport resistance, effective oxygen diffusivity () and fuel cell performance. Additionally, the CCLs are constructed with aid of Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) simulations and for CCLs with different pore size distribution are calculated. The findings reveal that initially increases and then decreases as the most probable pore size increases. A “sphere‐pipe” model is proposed to describe practical bulk oxygen transport in CCLs, highlighting the significant role of not only the pore size of secondary pores but also the number of primary pores in bulk oxygen transport.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Fuel Cells School of Mechanical Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai 200240 China
SJTU Paris Elite Institute of Technology Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai 200240 China
MOE Key Laboratory of Power & Machinery Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai 200240 China
Funding
Key Technologies Research and Development Program · Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality · Shanghai Jiao Tong University
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z ↗
2. 10.1039/C9CS00903E10.1039/C9CS00903E ↗
3. B. D.James Strategic Analysis Inc. 2022 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Presentation2022.
4. 10.1039/D2EE03169H10.1039/D2EE03169H ↗
5. 10.1016/j.elecom.2019.10659010.1016/j.elecom.2019.106590 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.12510.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.125 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.06610.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.066 ↗
8. 10.1002/advs.20220606210.1002/advs.202206062 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11708-020-0669-010.1007/s11708-020-0669-0 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11708-022-0837-510.1007/s11708-022-0837-5 ↗
11. 10.1002/cssc.20180007410.1002/cssc.201800074 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.12054910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120549 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0018610.1021/acsenergylett.8b00186 ↗
14. 10.1002/admt.20220022810.1002/admt.202200228 ↗
15. 10.1039/D2EE03553G10.1039/D2EE03553G ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.9b0917010.1021/jacs.9b09170 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.15410.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.154 ↗
18. Katzenberg A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020
19. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0021610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41565-020-00824-w10.1038/s41565-020-00824-w ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12579610.1016/j.cej.2020.125796 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.10074410.1016/j.coelec.2021.100744 ↗
23. 10.1039/D0NR02421J10.1039/D0NR02421J ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.08710.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.087 ↗
25. 10.1149/2.1141607jes10.1149/2.1141607jes ↗
26. Wang C. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2017 · 8 · 58
27. 10.1016/j.coche.2016.02.00610.1016/j.coche.2016.02.006 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.01.00210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.01.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.09410.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.094 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11380210.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113802 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.07310.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.073 ↗
32. 10.1149/2.0651501jes10.1149/2.0651501jes ↗
33. 10.1149/2.008308jes10.1149/2.008308jes ↗
34. 10.1149/2.0401904jes10.1149/2.0401904jes ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.065 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.07610.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.076 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10494310.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104943 ↗
38. 10.1149/2.0501914jes10.1149/2.0501914jes ↗
39. 10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00156-810.1016/S0360-3199(02)00156-8 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2020.08.01710.1016/j.pnsc.2020.08.017 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13538710.1016/j.cej.2022.135387 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.06910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.069 ↗
43. 10.1007/s12034-011-0155-810.1007/s12034-011-0155-8 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0258010.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02580 ↗
45. 10.1149/1.315222610.1149/1.3152226 ↗
46. 10.1149/2.061212jes10.1149/2.061212jes ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.10710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.107 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.07910.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.079 ↗
49. 10.1149/1.324236410.1149/1.3242364 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.11810.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.118 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRev.73.76210.1103/PhysRev.73.762 ↗
52. 10.1002/andp.1935416080210.1002/andp.19354160802 ↗
53. 10.1002/fuce.20120001710.1002/fuce.201200017 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.11610.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.116 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.19010.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.190 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11359010.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113590 ↗
57. 10.1149/2.0571813jes10.1149/2.0571813jes ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.02.03210.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.02.032 ↗
59. 10.1039/C7CP04837H10.1039/C7CP04837H ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.09910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.099 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.12410.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.124 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.11955310.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119553 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11356110.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113561 ↗
64. 10.1149/1.347820710.1149/1.3478207 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.12110.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.121 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12359010.1016/j.cej.2019.123590 ↗