journal article·2023-08Open access

Time‐Resolved Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy of Stochastic Nanoparticle Collision: Short Time Fourier Transform versus Continuous Wavelet Transform

Long Duong Ha, Ki Jun Kim, Seong Jung Kwon, Byoung‐Yong Chang, Seongpil Hwang

Small· Volume 19· Issue 33

Abstract

Abstract This work demonstrates the utilization of short‐time Fourier transform (STFT), and continuous wavelet transform (CWT) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) for time‐resolved analysis of stochastic collision events of platinum nanoparticles (NPs) onto gold ultramicroelectrode (UME). The enhanced electrocatalytic activity is observed in both chronoamperometry (CA) and EIS. CA provides the impact moment and rough estimation of the size of NPs. The quantitative information such as charge transfer resistance (Rct) relevant to the exchange current density of a single Pt NP is estimated from EIS. The CWT analysis of the phase angle parameter is better for NP collision detection in terms of time resolution compared to the STFT method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Advanced Materials Chemistry Korea University Sejong 30019 South Korea

Department of Chemistry Konkuk University 120 Neungdong‐ro Gwangjin‐gu Seoul 05029 South Korea

Department of Chemistry Pukyong National University 45 Yongso‐ro Nam‐gu Busan 48513 South Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/ijch.20100001410.1002/ijch.201000014 ↗
2. 10.1021/ja805139310.1021/ja8051393 ↗
3. 10.1002/smll.20180176510.1002/smll.201801765 ↗
4. 10.1002/chem.20170317510.1002/chem.201703175 ↗
5. 10.1002/celc.20160067310.1002/celc.201600673 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0022-0728(96)05038-310.1016/S0022-0728(96)05038-3 ↗
7. 10.1021/ac971245610.1021/ac9712456 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0022-0728(78)80156-910.1016/S0022-0728(78)80156-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0022-0728(79)80236-310.1016/S0022-0728(79)80236-3 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0275706210.1007/BF02757062 ↗
11. 10.1021/ac990754010.1021/ac9907540 ↗
12. 10.1146/annurev.anchem.012809.10221110.1146/annurev.anchem.012809.102211 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b0322610.1021/acs.analchem.9b03226 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0013-4686(97)00238-710.1016/S0013-4686(97)00238-7 ↗
15. 10.33961/jecst.2021.0126310.33961/jecst.2021.01263 ↗
16. 10.1038/059200b010.1038/059200b0 ↗
17. 10.1002/celc.20210009310.1002/celc.202100093 ↗
18. 10.1190/1.144132810.1190/1.1441328 ↗
19. 10.1137/051505610.1137/0515056 ↗
20. 10.1017/978100908951710.1017/9781009089517 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0282210.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02822 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.04810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.048 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13476010.1016/j.electacta.2019.134760 ↗
24. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.305836810.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058368 ↗
25. 10.20964/2021.03.5010.20964/2021.03.50 ↗
26. 10.3390/nano912169510.3390/nano9121695 ↗
27. 10.1039/c0cp02543g10.1039/c0cp02543g ↗
28. 10.1021/la304056610.1021/la3040566 ↗
29. Bard A. J. · 2022
30. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.08.05710.1016/j.elecom.2009.08.057 ↗
31. 10.1021/nn901583u10.1021/nn901583u ↗
32. 10.1016/0022-0728(94)03303-X10.1016/0022-0728(94)03303-X ↗
33. 10.33961/jecst.2022.0045110.33961/jecst.2022.00451 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10008005018310.1007/s100080050183 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1133010.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11330 ↗