Electrodynamic Force, Casimir Effect, and Stiction Mitigation in Silicon Carbide Nanoelectromechanical Switches
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Logic switches enabled by nanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS) offer abrupt on/off‐state transition with zero off‐state leakage and minimal subthreshold swing, making them uniquely suited for enhancing mainstream electronics in a range of applications, such as power gating, high‐temperature and high‐voltage logic, and ultralow‐power circuits requiring zero standby leakage. As NEMS switches are scaled with genuinely nanoscale gaps and contacts, quantum mechanical electrodynamic force (EDF) takes an important role and may be the ultimate cause of the plaguing problem of stiction. Here, combined with experiments on three‐terminal silicon carbide (SiC) NEMS switches, a theoretical investigation is performed to elucidate the origin of EDF and Casimir effect leading to stiction, and to develop a stiction‐mitigation design. The EDF calculation with full Lifshitz formula using the actual material and device parameters is provided. Finite element modeling and analytical calculations demonstrate that EDF becomes dominant over elastic restoring force in such SiC NEMS when the switching gap shrinks to a few nanometers, leading to irreversible stiction at contact. Artificially corrugated contact surfaces are designed to reduce the contact area and the EDF, thus evading stiction. This rational surface engineering reduces the EDF down to 4% compared with the case of unengineered, flat contact surfaces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Case School of Engineering Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH 44106 USA
University of Michigan–Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai 200240 China
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering University of Florida Gainesville FL 32611 USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Defense Threat Reduction Agency
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Roukes M. L. · 2004 · 539
2. 10.1109/JPROC.2010.206341110.1109/JPROC.2010.2063411 ↗
3. Lin Y. · 2008 · 640
4. 10.1038/nnano.2008.9810.1038/nnano.2008.98 ↗
5. 10.1109/TED.2011.217294610.1109/TED.2011.2172946 ↗
6. Feng P. X.‐L. · 2015 · 1
7. 10.1126/science.119251110.1126/science.1192511 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl100973410.1021/nl1009734 ↗
9. He T. · 2013 · 669
10. 10.1109/JMEMS.2013.226999510.1109/JMEMS.2013.2269995 ↗
11. 10.1088/0960-1317/25/9/09501410.1088/0960-1317/25/9/095014 ↗
12. Israelachvili J. N. · 2011
13. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.3910.1038/nphoton.2011.39 ↗
14. 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.04500310.1103/RevModPhys.88.045003 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41586-019-1800-410.1038/s41586-019-1800-4 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms1140310.1038/ncomms11403 ↗
17. 10.1109/JSTQE.2007.89308210.1109/JSTQE.2007.893082 ↗
18. 10.1088/0034-4885/68/1/R0410.1088/0034-4885/68/1/R04 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00015-110.1016/S0370-1573(01)00015-1 ↗
20. 10.1016/0375-9601(68)90665-810.1016/0375-9601(68)90665-8 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0102044110.1007/BF01020441 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.08040310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.080403 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.04040110.1103/PhysRevLett.103.040401 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.08502110.1103/PhysRevD.80.085021 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.01211910.1103/PhysRevA.81.012119 ↗
26. 10.1039/C7NR09318G10.1039/C7NR09318G ↗
27. 10.1088/1361-6528/aaf5b510.1088/1361-6528/aaf5b5 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.04040210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.040402 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.02250510.1103/PhysRevA.81.022505 ↗
30. 10.1126/science.105798410.1126/science.1057984 ↗
31. 10.1038/ncomms351510.1038/ncomms3515 ↗
32. 10.1038/ncomms656810.1038/ncomms6568 ↗
33. 10.1038/nature0761010.1038/nature07610 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.16040210.1103/PhysRevLett.104.160402 ↗
35. 10.1038/ncomms284210.1038/ncomms2842 ↗
36. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.25410.1038/nphoton.2016.254 ↗
37. Palik E. D. · 1997
38. Harris G. L. · 1995
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1072210.1103/PhysRevB.50.10722 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.36297510.1063/1.362975 ↗
41. 10.1364/AO.10.00103410.1364/AO.10.001034 ↗
42. He T. · 2013 · 108
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.03543910.1103/PhysRevB.77.035439 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.19544010.1103/PhysRevB.89.195440 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.08543410.1103/PhysRevB.93.085434 ↗
46. 10.1038/447772a10.1038/447772a ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.06405710.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.064057 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.36853610.1063/1.368536 ↗
49. 10.1038/nmat143110.1038/nmat1431 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07328-010.1016/S0043-1648(96)07328-0 ↗
51. 10.1038/ncomms351510.1038/ncomms3515 ↗