Pressure‐Modulated Luminescence Enhancement and Quenching in a Hydrogen‐Bonded Organic Framework
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Light emission in the solid state is central for illumination, sensing, and imaging applications. Unlike luminescence in dilute solutions, where the excited states are unimolecular in nature, intermolecular interaction plays a significant role in the quantum yield of solid‐state luminophores, manifested as competing aggregation‐caused quenching (ACQ) and aggregation‐induced enhancement (AIE). Both effects are extensively studied in various systems; however, it remains unclear how their competition depends on molecular conformation and intermolecular stacking. Here the direct observation of pressure‐modulated AIE‐ACQ competition in a crystalline hydrogen‐bonded organic framework (HOF) is reported. Using in situ spectroscopies and computational modeling, the intramolecular vibration and intermolecular π–π stacking directly responsible for the non‐radiative decay of the excited state are identified. The extent of these two contributions is modulated by hydrostatic pressure and guest molecules in the HOF pores. This work demonstrates a physically neat model system to understand and control solid‐state luminescence, and a potential material platform for piezoluminescent sensing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry University of North Texas Denton TX 76205 USA
Department of Physics University of Illinois Chicago Chicago IL 60607 USA
Department of Chemistry College of Science King Saud University Riyadh 11451 Saudi Arabia
Funding
King Saud University · Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences · Office of Science · Welch Foundation
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20220460410.1002/anie.202204604 ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.20191672910.1002/anie.201916729 ↗
3. 10.1002/advs.20160048410.1002/advs.201600484 ↗
4. 10.1021/jp061903310.1021/jp0619033 ↗
5. 10.1039/C5CP05266A10.1039/C5CP05266A ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20120466010.1002/anie.201204660 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-018-08092-y10.1038/s41467-018-08092-y ↗
8. 10.1021/jp077404z10.1021/jp077404z ↗
9. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2020.10029510.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2020.100295 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0026310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00263 ↗
11. 10.1039/b105159h10.1039/b105159h ↗
12. 10.1021/jz501371k10.1021/jz501371k ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-019-08722-z10.1038/s41467-019-08722-z ↗
14. Ma L. · Chem. Front. · 2017 · 1 · 2474
15. 10.1002/INMD.2022001110.1002/INMD.20220011 ↗
16. 10.1021/acssensors.2c0216510.1021/acssensors.2c02165 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.21453910.1016/j.ccr.2022.214539 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-024-45271-610.1038/s41467-024-45271-6 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0179610.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01796 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20230423410.1002/anie.202304234 ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20180035410.1002/anie.201800354 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.aan020210.1126/science.aan0202 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0638810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06388 ↗
24. 10.1073/pnas.210657211810.1073/pnas.2106572118 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.10813110.1016/j.dyepig.2019.108131 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jssc.2024.12478910.1016/j.jssc.2024.124789 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0797710.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07977 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.7b0218810.1021/jacs.7b02188 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.07.01310.1016/j.commatsci.2009.07.013 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.10117610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101176 ↗
31. 10.1039/b904665h10.1039/b904665h ↗
32. 10.1002/chem.20140381110.1002/chem.201403811 ↗
33. 10.1002/agt2.27710.1002/agt2.277 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.8b1444610.1021/acsami.8b14446 ↗
35. 10.1098/rsta.2013.027010.1098/rsta.2013.0270 ↗
36. 10.1038/nature2576510.1038/nature25765 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c0442810.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c04428 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.accounts.4c0007110.1021/acs.accounts.4c00071 ↗