Metal‐Air Field Emission Devices – Nano Electrode Geometries Comparison of Performance and Stability
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Air‐channel devices have a special advantage due to the promise of vacuum‐like ballistic transport in air, radiation insensitivity, and nanoscale size. Here, achieving high current at low voltage along with considerable mechanical stability is a primary issue. The comparative analysis of four planar and metallic electrode‐pair geometries at 10 nm channel length is presented. The impact of nano‐electrode‐pair geometries on overall device performance is investigated. Air‐channel devices are operated at the ultra‐low voltage of 5 mV to demonstrate the device dynamics of air‐channel devices at low power. Investigations focus on the direct tunneling (DT) mechanism which is dominant in the low‐voltage regime. Comparative analysis of different electrode‐pair geometries reveals two orders of magnitude increment in the current just by modulating the electrode‐pair structure. Theoretical analysis suggests that the emission current is directly related to the active junction area within the metal‐air‐metal interface at the direct tunneling regime. The geometry‐dependent mechanical stability of different electrode pairs is compared by imaging biasing triggered nanoscale structural changes and pulsed biasing stress analysis. The results and claims are confirmed and consolidated with the statistical analysis. Experimental investigations provide strong directions for high‐performance and stable devices. In‐depth theoretical discussions will enable the accurate modeling of emerging low‐power, high‐speed, radiation‐hardened nanoscale vacuum electronics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Functional Materials and Microsystems Research Group and the Micro Nano Research Facility RMIT University Melbourne Victoria 3001 Australia
School of Engineering RMIT University GPO Box 2476 Melbourne Victoria 3001 Australia
Faculty of Electrical Engineering Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Haifa 3200003 Israel
Department of Micro and Nanoelectronics Vellore Institute of Technology Vellore Tamil Nadu 632014 India
Funding
Australian Research Council
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/5.75725110.1109/5.757251 ↗
2. Greene R. · 1985
3. 10.1109/6668.95155010.1109/6668.951550 ↗
4. 10.1088/2631-7990/ac087c10.1088/2631-7990/ac087c ↗
5. 10.1002/aisy.20190003910.1002/aisy.201900039 ↗
6. 10.1016/0021-8502(88)90219-410.1016/0021-8502(88)90219-4 ↗
7. Guerrera S. A. · 2016
8. 10.1038/s41928-019-0289-z10.1038/s41928-019-0289-z ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0284910.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02849 ↗
10. 10.1039/D0NA00442A10.1039/D0NA00442A ↗
11. 10.3390/nano1012237810.3390/nano10122378 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0258710.1021/acsanm.0c02587 ↗
13. 10.1039/C4RA09503K10.1039/C4RA09503K ↗
14. Liu M. · 2017
15. 10.1063/1.499637010.1063/1.4996370 ↗
16. Liu M. · 2019
17. 10.1063/1.471775110.1063/1.4717751 ↗
18. 10.1116/6.000118210.1116/6.0001182 ↗
19. 10.1109/TED.2022.317570610.1109/TED.2022.3175706 ↗
20. 10.1109/TED.2021.310686810.1109/TED.2021.3106868 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0395910.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03959 ↗
22. 10.1149/1.212929510.1149/1.2129295 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mee.2020.11141810.1016/j.mee.2020.111418 ↗
24. 10.1002/cvde.20050645210.1002/cvde.200506452 ↗
25. 10.1039/C3NR05675A10.1039/C3NR05675A ↗
26. 10.1109/LED.2021.309547510.1109/LED.2021.3095475 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.172908110.1063/1.1729081 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.170268210.1063/1.1702682 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.02680110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.026801 ↗