Complete Corrosion Inhibition through Graphene Defect Passivation
Source abstract
Abstract
Graphene is expected to enable superior corrosion protection due to its impermeability and chemical inertness. Previous reports, however, demonstrate limited corrosion inhibition and even corrosion enhancement of graphene on metal surfaces. To enable the reliable and complete passivation, the origin of the low inhibition efficiency of graphene was investigated. Combining electrochemical and morphological characterization techniques, nanometer-sized structural defects in chemical vapor deposition grown graphene were found to be the cause for the limited passivation effect. Extremely fast mass transport on the order of meters per second both across and parallel to graphene layers results in an inhibition efficiency of only ∼50% for Cu covered with up to three graphene layers. Through selective passivation of the defects by atomic layer deposition (ALD) an enhanced corrosion protection of more than 99% was achieved, which compares favorably with commercial corrosion protection methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Semiconductor materials and devices · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate Institute of Opto-Mechatronics, National Chung Cheng University, 168 University Road, Min-Hsiung Township, Chiayi County, Taiwan 62102
Department of Material Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 70101
Green Energy and Environment Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan 31040
Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Novoselov K. · Nature · 2012 · 490 · 19210.1038/nature11458 ↗
2. Thompson N. G. · Corros. Rev. · 2007 · 25 · 24710.1515/CORRREV.2007.25.3-4.247 ↗
3. Mohanty N. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 127010.1021/nl104292k ↗
4. Dlubak B. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 1093010.1021/nn304424x ↗
5. Sung M. M. · Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. · 2001 · 22 · 748
6. Ahmad N. · Synth. Met. · 1996 · 78 · 10310.1016/0379-6779(96)80109-3 ↗
7. Yuk J. M. · Science · 2012 · 336 · 6110.1126/science.1217654 ↗
8. Smith A. D. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 323710.1021/nl401352k ↗
9. Bunch J. S. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 245810.1021/nl801457b ↗
10. Chen S. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 132110.1021/nn103028d ↗
11. Kirkland N. T. · Corros. Sci. · 2012 · 56 · 110.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.003 ↗
12. Prasai D. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 110210.1021/nn203507y ↗
13. Singh Raman R. K. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 404010.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.048 ↗
14. Ambrosi A. · Nanoscale · 2013 · 237910.1039/c3nr33824j ↗
15. Hobbins, N. D.; Roberts, R. F.Copper Corrosion Inhibitor. US Patent 4,395,294, 1983.
16. Zhou F. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 693910.1021/nn402150t ↗
17. Schriver M. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 576310.1021/nn4014356 ↗
18. Suk M. E. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 159010.1021/jz100240r ↗
19. Tsen A. W. · Science · 2012 · 336 · 114310.1126/science.1218948 ↗
20. Hofmann M. · Nano Res. · 2012 · 5 · 50410.1007/s12274-012-0227-0 ↗
21. Duong D. L. · Nature · 2012 · 490 · 23510.1038/nature11562 ↗
22. Kuiken H. K. · J. Eng. Math. · 2003 · 45 · 7510.1023/A:1022080019181 ↗
23. Du X. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 49110.1038/nnano.2008.199 ↗
24. Nair R. R. · Science · 2012 · 335 · 44210.1126/science.1211694 ↗
25. Regan W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 11310210.1063/1.3337091 ↗
26. Dai H. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 815210.1021/ja8023059 ↗
27. Drahushuk L. W. · Langmuir · 2012 · 28 · 1667110.1021/la303468r ↗
28. Williams K. R. · J. Microelectromech. Syst. · 2003 · 12 · 76110.1109/JMEMS.2003.820936 ↗
29. Tracz A. · Langmuir · 2003 · 19 · 680710.1021/la034103h ↗
30. Hsieh Y.-P. · J. Nanomater. · 2013 · 2013 · 39372410.1155/2013/393724 ↗