SDS Surfactants on Carbon Nanotubes: Aggregate Morphology
Source abstract
Abstract
Although carbon nanotubes have attracted enormous research interest, their practical application is still hindered, primarily, by the difficulty of separating them into samples monodispersed in diameter, chirality, and length. Recent advances show that ultracentrifugating carbon nanotube dispersions stabilized by surfactants is a promising route for achieving the desired separation. For further perfectioning this procedure it is necessary to know how surfactants adsorb on nanotubes of different diameters, which determines the nanotube-surfactant aggregate effective density and the nanotube-nanotube potential of mean force. Because only limited experimental data are available to elucidate these phenomena, we report here an extensive all-atom molecular dynamics study on the morphology of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) surfactant aggregates adsorbed on (6,6), (12,12), and (20,20) single walled carbon nanotubes at room conditions. Our calculations reveal that the nanotube diameter is the primary factor that determines the morphology of the aggregates because of a competition between the entropic and energetic advantage encountered by the surfactants when they wrap one nanotube, and the enthalpic penalty faced during this process due to bending of the surfactant molecule. The data are in qualitative agreement with the neutron scattering results reported by Yurekli et al. [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9902], and for the first time provide an atomic-level description helpful in designing better separation, as well as stabilization techniques for aqueous carbon nanotube dispersions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The University of Oklahoma, School of Chemical, Biological and Materials Engineering, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Shaffer M. S. P. · Adv. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 93710.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199908)11:11<937::AID-ADMA937>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
2. Vigolo B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 121010.1063/1.1497706 ↗
3. Cadek M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 512310.1063/1.1533118 ↗
4. Peters J. E. · Macromolecules · 2008 · 41 · 727410.1021/ma8011569 ↗
5. Nikolaev P. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 313 · 9110.1016/S0009-2614(99)01029-5 ↗
6. Bronikowski, M. J. ; Willis, P. A. ; Colbert, D. T.; Smith, K. A. ; Smalley, R. E. Gas-Phase Production of Carbon Single-Walled Nanotubes From Carbon Monoxideviathe Hipco Process: A Parametric Study.The 47th International Symposium: Vacuum, Thin Films, Surfaces/Interfaces, and Processing; NAN06: Boston, MA, 2001; pp1800−–180510.1116/1.1380721 ↗
7. Kitiyanan B. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 317 · 49710.1016/S0009-2614(99)01379-2 ↗
8. Iijima S. · Nature · 1991 · 354 · 5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
9. O’Connell M. J. · Science · 2002 · 297 · 59310.1126/science.1072631 ↗
10. Arnold M. S. · Nat. Nano · 2006 · 1 · 6010.1038/nnano.2006.52 ↗
11. Nair N. · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 179010.1021/la702516u ↗
12. Niyogi S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 114410.1021/ja807785e ↗
13. O’Connell M. J. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 342 · 26510.1016/S0009-2614(01)00490-0 ↗
14. Hagen A. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 38310.1021/nl020237o ↗
15. Wallace E. J. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 192310.1021/nl070602h ↗
16. Islam M. F. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 26910.1021/nl025924u ↗
17. Poulin P. · Carbon · 2002 · 40 · 174110.1016/S0008-6223(02)00042-8 ↗
18. Matarredona O. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 1335710.1021/jp0365099 ↗
19. Yurekli K. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 990210.1021/ja047451u ↗
20. Tummala N. R. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2008 · 112 · 198710.1021/jp077678m ↗
21. Sammalkorpi M. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2008 · 112 · 291510.1021/jp077636y ↗
22. Dominguez H. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 405410.1021/jp067768b ↗
23. Wanless E. J. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 320710.1021/jp952439x ↗
24. Ortiz-Acevedo A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 951210.1021/ja050507f ↗
25. Patel N. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 1412410.1021/ja0530570 ↗
26. Striolo A. · Phys. Rev. E · 2006 · 74 · 04140110.1103/PhysRevE.74.041401 ↗
27. Striolo A. · Small · 2007 · 3 · 62810.1002/smll.200600661 ↗
28. Striolo A. · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 44560610.1088/0957-4484/19/44/445606 ↗
29. Konatham D. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 463010.1021/nl802262p ↗
30. Strano M. S. · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2003 · 3 · 8110.1166/jnn.2003.194 ↗
31. Bandyopadhyay S. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 631810.1021/jp982051c ↗
32. Anderson C. F. · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 1982 · 33 · 19110.1146/annurev.pc.33.100182.001203 ↗
33. Manning G. S. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 1979 · 12 · 44310.1021/ar50144a004 ↗
34. Manning G. S. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 855410.1021/jp0670844 ↗
35. Le Bret M. · Biopolymers · 1984 · 23 · 28710.1002/bip.360230209 ↗
36. Manning G. S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1969 · 51 · 92410.1063/1.1672157 ↗
37. Essmann U. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1995 · 103 · 857710.1063/1.470117 ↗
38. Miyamoto S. · J. Comput. Chem. · 1992 · 13 · 95210.1002/jcc.540130805 ↗
39. Lindahl E. · J. Mol. Model. · 2001 · 7 · 30610.1007/s008940100045 ↗
40. Berendsen H. J. C. · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 1995 · 91 · 4310.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E ↗
41. Van Der Spoel D. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2005 · 26 · 170110.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
42. Frenkel D. · 1996 · 1