Presence of Nanoparticles in Wash Water from Conventional Silver and Nano-silver Textiles
Source abstract
Abstract
Questions about how to regulate nanoenhanced products regularly arise as researchers determine possible nanoparticle transformation(s). Focusing concern on the incorporation and subsequent release of nano-Ag in fabrics often overshadows the fact that many "conventional silver" antimicrobials such as ionic silver, AgCl, metallic Ag, and other forms will also form different species of silver. In this study we used a laboratory washing machine to simulate the household laundering of a number of textiles prepared with known conventional Ag or nano-Ag treatments and a commercially available fabric incorporating yarns coated with bulk metallic Ag. Serial filtration allowed for quantification of total Ag released in various size fractions (>0.45 μm, < 0.45 μm, <0.1 μm, and <10 kDa), while characterization of particles with TEM/EDX provided insight on Ag transformation mechanisms. Most conventional Ag additives yielded more total Ag and more nanoparticulate-sized Ag in the washing liquid than fabrics that used nano-Ag treatments. Incorporating nano-silver into the fiber (as opposed to surface treatments) yielded less total Ag during fabric washing. A variety of metallic Ag, AgCl, and Ag/S particles were observed in washing solution by TEM/EDX to various extents depending on the initial Ag speciation in the fabrics. Very similar particles were also observed when dissolved ionic Ag was added directly into the washing liquid. On the basis of the present study, we can state that all silver-treated textiles, regardless of whether the treatment is "conventional" or "nano", can be a source of silver nanoparticles in washing solution when laundering fabrics. Indeed, in this study we observed that textiles treated with "conventional" silver have equal or greater propensity to form nano-silver particles during washing conditions than those treated with "nano"-silver. This fact needs to be strongly considered when addressing the risks of nano-silver and emphasizes that regulatory assessment of nano-silver warrants a similar approach to conventional silver.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Technology and Society Laboratory, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, CH-9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland
Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
Electron Microscopy Center, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
HeiQ Materials AG, Zürcherstrasse 42, CH-5330 Bad Zurzach, Switzerland
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Seltenrich N. · Environ. Health Perspect. · 2013 · 121 · A220
2. BfR. BfR rät von Nanosilber in Lebensmitteln und Produkten des täglichen Bedarfs ab, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, Germany, Stellungnahme Nr. 024/2010; 2009.
3. Nowack B. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 117710.1021/es103316q ↗
4. Kumar R. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B · 2005 · 75 · 31110.1002/jbm.b.30306 ↗
5. Lorenz C. · Chemosphere · 2012 · 89 · 81710.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.063 ↗
6. Geranio L. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 811310.1021/es9018332 ↗
7. Benn T. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 42 · 413310.1021/es7032718 ↗
8. Benn T. · J. Environ. Quality · 2010 · 39 · 187510.2134/jeq2009.0363 ↗
9. Liu J. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 44 · 216910.1021/es9035557 ↗
10. McMahon M. · Appl. Phys. B: Laser Opt. · 2005 · 80 · 91510.1007/s00340-005-1793-6 ↗
11. Lin H. · Corrosion · 2013 · 69 · 106010.5006/0926 ↗
12. Li X. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 537810.1021/es204531y ↗
13. Misra S. K. · Sci. Total Environ. · 2012 · 438 · 22510.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.066 ↗
14. Quadros M. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 47 · 889410.1021/es4015844 ↗
15. Kulthong K. · Part. Fibre Toxicol. · 2010 · 7 · 110.1186/1743-8977-7-8 ↗
16. von Götz N. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 47 · 997910.1021/es304329w ↗
17. Farkas J. · Environ. Int. · 2011 · 37 · 105710.1016/j.envint.2011.03.006 ↗
18. Maurer F. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 880810.1021/es301520s ↗
19. Akaighe N. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 389510.1021/es103946g ↗
20. Yin Y. G. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 791010.1021/nn302293r ↗
21. Jones A. M. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 142810.1021/es103757c ↗
22. Glover R. D. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 895010.1021/nn2031319 ↗
23. Kaegi R. · Water Res. · 2013 · 47 · 386610.1016/j.watres.2012.11.060 ↗
24. Kaegi R. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 390210.1021/es1041892 ↗
25. Koura N. · 1990 · 441
26. Yuen C. W. M. · Fibers Polym. · 2013 · 14 · 8210.1007/s12221-013-0082-y ↗
27. Klein C. L. · 2011
28. Nowack B. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 117710.1021/es103316q ↗
29. Lombi E. · Chemosphere · 2014 · 111 · 35210.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.116 ↗
30. Levard C. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 47 · 573810.1021/es400396f ↗
31. Reinsch B. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 699210.1021/es203732x ↗
32. McMahon M. D. · Appl. Phys. B: Laser Opt. · 2005 · 80 · 91510.1007/s00340-005-1793-6 ↗
33. Levard C. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 526010.1021/es2007758 ↗
34. Reinsch B. C. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 699210.1021/es203732x ↗
35. Kaegi R. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 390210.1021/es1041892 ↗
36. Kim B. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 44 · 750910.1021/es101565j ↗
37. Levard C. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 690010.1021/es2037405 ↗
38. Rice D. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1981 · 128 · 27510.1149/1.2127403 ↗
39. Kim H. · Mater. Corros. · 2003 · 54 · 24310.1002/maco.200390053 ↗
40. Volpe L. · Corros. Sci. · 1989 · 29 · 117910.1016/0010-938X(89)90065-6 ↗
41. Watanabe M. · Corrosion · 2006 · 62 · 24310.5006/1.3278270 ↗
42. Windler L. · Environ. Int. · 2013 · 53 · 6210.1016/j.envint.2012.12.010 ↗
43. Sanitized silver for bedding: natural effect against bacteria and dust mites.http://www.sanitized.com/en/business-partners/trademark-products/active-substances/silver.html, accessed June 25, 2014.
44. Ash M. · 2004
45. Sigma-Aldrich silver-exchanged zeolite.http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/382280?lang=en®ion=US, accessed June 24, 2014.
46. USEPA. Decision document: conditional registration of HeiQ AGS-20 as a materials preservative in textiles;U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011.
47. Egger S. · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 2009 · 75 · 297310.1128/AEM.01658-08 ↗
48. Biomaterials, N. FAQs EPA Registration and Labeling.http://www.noblebiomaterials.com/category2.asp?itemid=336, accessed June 24, 2014.
49. Lorenz C. · Chemosphere · 2012 · 89 · 81710.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.063 ↗
50. Windler L. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 818110.1021/es301633b ↗
51. Gustafsson, J. P.VisualMINTEQversion 3.0; 2011. Available athttp://www2.lwr.kth.se/English/OurSoftware/Vminteq/index.html.