journal article·2009-03-24

Transparent, Flexible, and Highly Conductive Thin Films Based on Polymer−Nanotube Composites

Sukanta De, Philip E. Lyons, Sophie Sorel, Evelyn M. Doherty, Paul J. King, Werner J. Blau, Peter N. Nirmalraj, John J. Boland, Vittorio Scardaci, Jerome Joimel, Jonathan N. Coleman

ACS Nano· Volume 3· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

We have prepared flexible, transparent, and very conducting thin composite films from poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate), filled with both arc discharge and HIPCO single-walled nanotubes, at high loading level. The films are of high optical uniformity. The arc discharge nanotube-filled composites were significantly more conductive, demonstrating DC conductivities of >10(5) S/m for mass fractions >50 wt %. The ratio of DC to optical conductivity was higher for composites with mass fractions of 55-60 wt % than for nanotube-only films. For an 80 nm thick composite, filled with 60 wt % arc discharge nanotubes, this conductivity ratio was maximized at sigma(DC)/sigma(Op) = 15. This translates into transmittance (550 nm) and sheet resistance of 75 and 80 Omega/square, respectively. These composites were electromechanically very stable, showing <1% resistance change over 130 bend cycles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Physics

CRANN

School of Chemistry, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

Hewlett-Packard DIMO, Liffey Park Technology Campus, Barnhall Road, Leixlip, Co Kildare, Ireland

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen Z. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 2002 · 69 · 59710.1016/S0013-7944(01)00104-7 ↗
2. Leterrier Y. · Thin Solid Films · 2004 · 460 · 15610.1016/j.tsf.2004.01.052 ↗
3. Dressel M. · 200210.1017/CBO9780511606168 ↗
4. Hu L. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 251310.1021/nl048435y ↗
5. Aguirre C. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 18310410.1063/1.2199461 ↗
6. Barnes T. M. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 23541010.1103/PhysRevB.75.235410 ↗
7. Fanchini G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 09211410.1063/1.2709903 ↗
8. Geng H. Z. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 775810.1021/ja0722224 ↗
9. Geng H. Z. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 455 · 27510.1016/j.cplett.2008.02.102 ↗
10. Gruner G. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2006 · 16 · 353310.1039/b603821m ↗
11. Kaempgen M. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 252 · 42510.1016/j.apsusc.2005.01.020 ↗
12. Li Z. R. · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 265510.1021/la701880h ↗
13. Parekh B. B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 12191310.1063/1.2715027 ↗
14. Pasquier A. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 20351110.1063/1.2132065 ↗
15. Wu Z. C. · Science · 2004 · 305 · 127310.1126/science.1101243 ↗
16. Yim J. H. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 2008 · 26 · 85110.1116/1.2827507 ↗
17. Zhang D. H. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 188010.1021/nl0608543 ↗
18. Lyons P. E. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 04430210.1063/1.2968437 ↗
19. Bauhofer W. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2008
20. Blighe F. · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 444310.1002/adma.200602912 ↗
21. Guo H. · Polymer · 2005 · 46 · 300110.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.013 ↗
22. Ham H. T. · Polym. Eng. Sci. · 2008 · 48 · 110.1002/pen.20805 ↗
23. Moon J. S. · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2005 · 14 · 188210.1016/j.diamond.2005.07.015 ↗
24. Mustonen T. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2007 · 244 · 433610.1002/pssb.200776186 ↗
25. Wang W. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 141510.1021/ja0768035 ↗
26. Wang G. F. · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 14520110.1088/0957-4484/19/14/145201 ↗
27. Crispin X. · Chem. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 435410.1021/cm061032+ ↗
28. Ruzicka B. · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · R246810.1103/PhysRevB.61.R2468 ↗
29. Kilbride B. E. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 402410.1063/1.1506397 ↗
30. Dikin D. A. · Nature · 2007 · 448 · 45710.1038/nature06016 ↗