Low-Temperature Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Graphene from Toluene on Electropolished Copper Foils
Source abstract
Abstract
A two-step CVD route with toluene as the carbon precursor was used to grow continuous large-area monolayer graphene films on a very flat, electropolished Cu foil surface at 600 °C, lower than any temperature reported to date for growing continuous monolayer graphene. Graphene coverage is higher on the surface of electropolished Cu foil than that on the unelectropolished one under the same growth conditions. The measured hole and electron mobilities of the monolayer graphene grown at 600 °C were 811 and 190 cm(2)/(V·s), respectively, and the shift of the Dirac point was 18 V. The asymmetry in carrier mobilities can be attributed to extrinsic doping during the growth or transfer. The optical transmittance of graphene at 550 nm was 97.33%, confirming it was a monolayer, and the sheet resistance was ~8.02 × 10(3) Ω/□.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Radiation Effects in Electronics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Materials Science and Engineering Program, The University of Texas at Austin, One University Station C2200, Austin, Texas 78712-0292, United States
Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, People’s Republic of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Li X. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 131210.1126/science.1171245 ↗
2. Bae S. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 57410.1038/nnano.2010.132 ↗
3. Lopez G. A. · Scr. Mater. · 2004 · 51 · 110.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.03.028 ↗
4. Li X. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 281610.1021/ja109793s ↗
5. Weatherup R. S. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 415410.1021/nl202036y ↗
6. Dong X. · Carbon · 2011 · 49 · 367210.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.069 ↗
7. Guermoune A. · Carbon · 2011 · 49 · 420410.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.054 ↗
8. Srivastava A. · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 345710.1021/cm101027c ↗
9. Yao Y. G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 523210.1021/jp109002p ↗
10. Li Z. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 338510.1021/nn200854p ↗
11. Luo Z. · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 144110.1021/cm1028854 ↗
12. Wellmann R. · Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 542 · 8110.1016/S0039-6028(03)00928-2 ↗
13. Szwarc M. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1948 · 16 · 12810.1063/1.1746794 ↗
14. Andrea C, F. · Solid State Commun. · 2007 · 143 · 4710.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052 ↗
15. Malard L. M. · Phys. Rep. · 2009 · 473 · 5110.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003 ↗
16. Li X. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 432810.1021/nl101629g ↗
17. Yu Q. · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 44310.1038/nmat3010 ↗
18. Dai C. Y. · Philos. Mag. · 2011 · 91 · 93210.1080/14786435.2010.538017 ↗
19. Gao L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 183109-3
20. Fromm E · Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams · 1984 · 5 · 323
21. Chen J. -H. · Nat. Phys. · 2008 · 4 · 37710.1038/nphys935 ↗
22. Novikov D. S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 10210210.1063/1.2779107 ↗
23. Li X. S. · ECS Trans. · 2009 · 19 · 41
24. Suk J. W. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 691610.1021/nn201207c ↗
25. Morozov S. V. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 01660210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.016602 ↗
26. Pauw L. J. V. D. · Philips Tech. Rev. · 1958 · 20 · 220