Robust Triboelectric Nanogenerator Based on Rolling Electrification and Electrostatic Induction at an Instantaneous Energy Conversion Efficiency of ∼55%
Source abstract
Abstract
In comparison to in-pane sliding friction, rolling friction not only is likely to consume less mechanical energy but also presents high robustness with minimized wearing of materials. In this work, we introduce a highly efficient approach for harvesting mechanical energy based on rolling electrification and electrostatic induction, aiming at improving the energy conversion efficiency and device durability. The rolling triboelectric nanogenerator is composed of multiple steel rods sandwiched by two fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) thin films. The rolling motion of the steel rods between the FEP thin films introduces triboelectric charges on both surfaces and leads to the change of potential difference between each pair of electrodes on back of the FEP layer, which drives the electrons to flow in the external load. As power generators, each pair of output terminals works independently and delivers an open-circuit voltage of 425 V, and a short-circuit current density of 5 mA/m(2). The two output terminals can also be integrated to achieve an overall power density of up to 1.6 W/m(2). The impacts of variable structural factors were investigated for optimization of the output performance, and other prototypes based on rolling balls were developed to accommodate different types of mechanical energy sources. Owing to the low frictional coefficient of the rolling motion, an instantaneous energy conversion efficiency of up to 55% was demonstrated and the high durability of the device was confirmed. This work presents a substantial advancement of the triboelectric nanogenerators toward large-scope energy harvesting and self-powered systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0245, United States
Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
Funding
Multidisciplinary Research Program of the University Research Initiative · Basic Energy Sciences
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Beeby S. P. · J. Micromech. Microeng. · 2007 · 17 · 125710.1088/0960-1317/17/7/007 ↗
2. El-hami M. · Sensor Actuat. A-Phys. · 2001 · 92 · 33510.1016/S0924-4247(01)00569-6 ↗
3. Bell L. E. · Science · 2008 · 321 · 145710.1126/science.1158899 ↗
4. Kraemer D. · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 53210.1038/nmat3013 ↗
5. Shao Z. P. · Nature · 2005 · 435 · 79510.1038/nature03673 ↗
6. Debe M. K. · Nature · 2012 · 486 · 4310.1038/nature11115 ↗
7. Huynh W. U. · Science · 2002 · 295 · 242510.1126/science.1069156 ↗
8. Tian B. Z. · Nature · 2007 · 449 · 88510.1038/nature06181 ↗
9. Wang Z. L. · Science · 2006 · 312 · 24210.1126/science.1124005 ↗
10. Wang X. D. · Science · 2007 · 316 · 10210.1126/science.1139366 ↗
11. Wang Z. L. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 953310.1021/nn404614z ↗
12. Fan F. R. · Nano Energy · 2012 · 1 · 32810.1016/j.nanoen.2012.01.004 ↗
13. Fan F. R. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 310910.1021/nl300988z ↗
14. Zhu G. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 496010.1021/nl302560k ↗
15. Wang S. H. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 633910.1021/nl303573d ↗
16. Lin L. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 291610.1021/nl4013002 ↗
17. Zhu G. · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 378810.1002/adma.201400021 ↗
18. Zhu G. · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 342610.1038/ncomms4426 ↗
19. Castle G. S. P. · J. Electrostat. · 1997 · 40 · 1310.1016/S0304-3886(97)00009-0 ↗
20. Diaz A. F. · J. Electrostat. · 2004 · 62 · 27710.1016/j.elstat.2004.05.005 ↗
21. McCarty L. S. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 218810.1002/anie.200701812 ↗
22. Zhou Y. S. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 277110.1021/nl401006x ↗
23. Zhong J. W. · Nano Energy · 2013 · 2 · 49110.1016/j.nanoen.2012.11.015 ↗
24. Zhu G. · Nano Energy · 2013 · 2 · 68810.1016/j.nanoen.2013.08.002 ↗
25. Zhou Y. S. · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 171910.1002/adma.201304619 ↗
26. Lin L. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 826610.1021/nn4037514 ↗
27. Zhang H. L. · Nano Energy · 2013 · 2 · 101910.1016/j.nanoen.2013.03.024 ↗
28. Zhang H. L. · Nano Energy · 2013 · 2 · 69310.1016/j.nanoen.2013.08.004 ↗
29. Tang W. · Nano Energy · 2013 · 2 · 116410.1016/j.nanoen.2013.04.009 ↗
30. Wang S. H. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 222610.1021/nl400738p ↗
31. Zhu G. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 228210.1021/nl4008985 ↗
32. Yang Y. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 734210.1021/nn403021m ↗
33. Wang S. H. · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 281810.1002/adma.201305303 ↗
34. Niu S. M. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 618410.1002/adma.201302808 ↗
35. Niu S. M. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 6 · 357610.1039/c3ee42571a ↗
36. Xie Y. N. · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 659910.1002/adma.201402428 ↗