Use of a High-Throughput Screening Approach Coupled with In Vivo Zebrafish Embryo Screening To Develop Hazard Ranking for Engineered Nanomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
Because of concerns about the safety of a growing number of engineered nanomaterials (ENM), it is necessary to develop high-throughput screening and in silico data transformation tools that can speed up in vitro hazard ranking. Here, we report the use of a multiparametric, automated screening assay that incorporates sublethal and lethal cellular injury responses to perform high-throughput analysis of a batch of commercial metal/metal oxide nanoparticles (NP) with the inclusion of a quantum dot (QD1). The responses chosen for tracking cellular injury through automated epifluorescence microscopy included ROS production, intracellular calcium flux, mitochondrial depolarization, and plasma membrane permeability. The z-score transformed high volume data set was used to construct heat maps for in vitro hazard ranking as well as showing the similarity patterns of NPs and response parameters through the use of self-organizing maps (SOM). Among the materials analyzed, QD1 and nano-ZnO showed the most prominent lethality, while Pt, Ag, SiO2, Al2O3, and Au triggered sublethal effects but without cytotoxicity. In order to compare the in vitro with the in vivo response outcomes in zebrafish embryos, NPs were used to assess their impact on mortality rate, hatching rate, cardiac rate, and morphological defects. While QDs, ZnO, and Ag induced morphological abnormalities or interfered in embryo hatching, Pt and Ag exerted inhibitory effects on cardiac rate. Ag toxicity in zebrafish differed from the in vitro results, which is congruent with this material's designation as extremely dangerous in the environment. Interestingly, while toxicity in the initially selected QD formulation was due to a solvent (toluene), supplementary testing of additional QDs selections yielded in vitro hazard profiling that reflect the release of chalcogenides. In conclusion, the use of a high-throughput screening, in silico data handling and zebrafish testing may constitute a paradigm for rapid and integrated ENM toxicological screening.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of NanoMedicine
Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, California NanoSystems Institute
Departament d’Enginyeria Informatica i Matematiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Spain,
Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology
Molecular Shared Screening Resources
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Mol Genetics
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Nel A. · Science · 2006 · 311 · 62210.1126/science.1114397 ↗
2. Nanotechnology Consumer Product Inventory. Washington DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnology. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Available athttp://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/.
3. Service R. F. · Science · 2008 · 321 · 103610.1126/science.321.5892.1036 ↗
4. Hartung T. · Nature · 2009 · 460 · 20810.1038/460208a ↗
5. Council. N. R. · 2007
6. George S. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 1510.1021/nn901503q ↗
7. Kahru A. · Toxicology · 2010 · 269 · 10510.1016/j.tox.2009.08.016 ↗
8. Ofek B.-I. · Small · 2009 · 5 · 189710.1002/smll.200801716 ↗
9. Asharani P. V. · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 25510210.1088/0957-4484/19/25/255102 ↗
10. Pardo-Martin C. · Nat. Methods · 2010 · 7 · 63410.1038/nmeth.1481 ↗
11. Lee K. J. · ACS Nano · 2007 · 1 · 13310.1021/nn700048y ↗
12. Zhu X. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 19510310.1088/0957-4484/20/19/195103 ↗
13. King-Heiden T. C. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 160510.1021/es801925c ↗
14. Warheit D. B. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 793910.1021/es901453p ↗
15. Duffin R. · Inhal. Toxicol. · 2007 · 19 · 84910.1080/08958370701479323 ↗
16. Rushton E. K. · J. Toxicol. Environ. Health · 2010 · 73 · 44510.1080/15287390903489422 ↗
17. Ji Z. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 44 · 730910.1021/es100417s ↗
18. Xia T. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 212110.1021/nn800511k ↗
19. Xia T. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 8510.1021/nn700256c ↗
20. Xia T. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 179410.1021/nl061025k ↗
21. Nel A. E. · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 54310.1038/nmat2442 ↗
22. Meng H. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 162010.1021/nn9005973 ↗
23. Fako V. E. · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2009 · 61 · 47810.1016/j.addr.2009.03.008 ↗
24. Lamelas C. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 39 · 610910.1021/es050445t ↗
25. Drake P. L. · Ann. Occup. Hyg. · 2005 · 49 · 575
26. Orrenius, S.; Nicotera, P.; Zhivotovsky, B.Cell Death Mechanisms and Their Implications in Toxicology.Toxicol. Sci. 2010, in press.10.1093/toxsci/kfq268 ↗
27. Weber H. · Digestion · 1998 · 59 · 17510.1159/000007486 ↗
28. Rosenberg N. L. · Neurotoxicol. Teratol. · 1988 · 10 · 48910.1016/0892-0362(88)90014-1 ↗
29. Mattia C. · Mol. Chem. Neuropathol. · 1993 · 18 · 31310.1007/BF03160122 ↗
30. Mcdermott C. · Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. · 2007 · 219 · 8510.1016/j.taap.2006.12.004 ↗
31. Reedijk J. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2003 · 100 · 361110.1073/pnas.0737293100 ↗
32. Pascoe J. M. · Biochem. Pharmacol. · 1974 · 23 · 134510.1016/0006-2952(74)90354-2 ↗
33. Elder A. · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 312410.1002/adma.200701962 ↗
34. Zhang L. · Biochemistry · 2006 · 45 · 895910.1021/bi060027g ↗
35. Kirchner C. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 5 · 33110.1021/nl047996m ↗
36. Hardman R. A · Environ. Health Perspect. · 2006 · 114 · 16510.1289/ehp.8284 ↗
37. Derfus A. M. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 4 · 1110.1021/nl0347334 ↗
38. Müller L. · Toxicology · 1986 · 40 · 28510.1016/0300-483X(86)90061-2 ↗
39. Ji J. H. · Inhal. Toxicol. · 2007 · 19 · 85710.1080/08958370701432108 ↗
40. Kim Y. S. · Inhal. Toxicol. · 2008 · 20 · 57510.1080/08958370701874663 ↗
41. Hussain S. M. · Toxicol. In Vitro · 2005 · 19 · 97510.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.034 ↗
42. Luckey T. D. · 1978 · 32
43. Bowman T. V. · ACS Chem. Biol. · 2010 · 5 · 15910.1021/cb100029t ↗
44. 10.3109/17435390.2010.48920710.3109/17435390.2010.489207 ↗
45. Hogstrand C. · Environ. Toxicol. Chem. · 1998 · 17 · 54710.1002/etc.5620170405 ↗
46. Wesselkamper S. C. · Toxicol. Sci. · 2001 · 60 · 14410.1093/toxsci/60.1.144 ↗
47. Rohrs L. C. · Arch. Intern. Med. · 1957 · 100 · 4410.1001/archinte.1957.00260070058005 ↗
48. Xia T. · ACS Nano · 2011
49. Osterauer R. · Chemosphere · 2009 · 77 · 97510.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.033 ↗
50. Kohonen T. · Proc. IEEE · 1990 · 78 · 146410.1109/5.58325 ↗
51. Yang Z. R. · J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. · 2003 · 43 · 174810.1021/ci034138n ↗
52. Thalamuthu A. · Bioinformatics · 2006 · 22 · 240510.1093/bioinformatics/btl406 ↗
53. Dalton L. · Curr. Genomics · 2009 · 10 · 43010.2174/138920209789177601 ↗
54. Kroll A. · Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. · 2009 · 72 · 37010.1016/j.ejpb.2008.08.009 ↗
55. Daszykowski M. · Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. · 2007 · 85 · 20310.1016/j.chemolab.2006.06.016 ↗
56. Saeed A. I. · 2006 · 411 · 134
57. Vesanto J. · 2002 · 61110.1007/978-3-7908-1782-9_44 ↗
58. 10.1021/es103606x10.1021/es103606x ↗