journal article·2013-06-25

Sulfur-Doped Graphene via Thermal Exfoliation of Graphite Oxide in H2S, SO2, or CS2 Gas

Hwee Ling Poh, Petr Šimek, Zdeněk Sofer, Martin Pumera

ACS Nano· Volume 7· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Doping of graphene with heteroatoms is an effective way to tailor its properties. Here we describe a simple and scalable method of doping graphene lattice with sulfur atoms during the thermal exfoliation process of graphite oxides. The graphite oxides were first prepared by Staudenmaier, Hofmann, and Hummers methods followed by treatments in hydrogen sulfide, sulfur dioxide, or carbon disulfide. The doped materials were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, combustible elemental analysis, and Raman spectroscopy. The ζ-potential and conductivity of sulfur-doped graphenes were also investigated in this paper. It was found that the level of doping is more dramatically influenced by the type of graphite oxide used rather than the type of sulfur-containing gas used during exfoliation. Resulting sulfur-doped graphenes act as metal-free electrocatalysts for an oxygen reduction reaction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Chemistry & Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore,

Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Technology, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Novoselov K. S. · Science · 2004 · 306 · 66610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
2. Geim A. K. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 18310.1038/nmat1849 ↗
3. Rogers J. A. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 25410.1038/nnano.2008.115 ↗
4. Stankovich S. · Nature · 2006 · 442 · 28210.1038/nature04969 ↗
5. Ramanathan T. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 32710.1038/nnano.2008.96 ↗
6. Stoller M. D. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 349810.1021/nl802558y ↗
7. Liu Z. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 1087610.1021/ja803688x ↗
8. Rao C. N. R. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 775210.1002/anie.200901678 ↗
9. Pumera M. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2010 · 39 · 414610.1039/c002690p ↗
10. Gutes A. · Nanoscale · 2012 · 4 · 43810.1039/C1NR11537E ↗
11. Giovanni M. · Nanoscale · 2012 · 4 · 500210.1039/c2nr31077e ↗
12. Gopalakrishnan K. · RSC Adv. · 2012 · 2 · 160510.1039/C1RA00403D ↗
13. Poh H. L. · Chem.—Eur. J. · 2013 · 19 · 265510.1002/chem.201202972 ↗
14. Zbořil R. · Small · 2010 · 6 · 288510.1002/smll.201001401 ↗
15. Samarakoon D. K. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 401710.1021/nn901317d ↗
16. Wu Z.-S. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 546310.1021/nn2006249 ↗
17. Jin Z. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 411210.1021/nn200766e ↗
18. Reddy A. L. M. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 633710.1021/nn101926g ↗
19. Velez-Fort E. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 1089310.1021/nn304315z ↗
20. Qu L. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 132110.1021/nn901850u ↗
21. Yang Z. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 20510.1021/nn203393d ↗
22. Denis P. A. · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 67 · 20310.1016/j.commatsci.2012.08.041 ↗
23. Yan Y. · Chem. Commun. · 2012 · 48 · 1066310.1039/c2cc36234a ↗
24. Wang J.-Z. · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 16 · 703010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.106 ↗
25. Staudenmaier L. · Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. · 1898 · 31 · 148110.1002/cber.18980310237 ↗
26. Hofmann U. · Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. · 1937 · 234 · 31110.1002/zaac.19372340405 ↗
27. Hummers W. S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1958 · 80 · 133910.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
28. Canado L. G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 16310610.1063/1.2196057 ↗
29. Cuong T. V. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 04190510.1063/1.3616142 ↗
30. Chua C. K. · Chem.—Eur. J. · 2012 · 18 · 1345310.1002/chem.201202320 ↗
31. Adam L. · Physica E · 2009 · 41 · 72310.1016/j.physe.2008.11.018 ↗
32. Van der Pauw L. J. · Philips Res. Rep. · 1958 · 13 · 1