Graphene Oxide as an Ideal Substrate for Hydrogen Storage
Source abstract
Abstract
Organometallic nanomaterials hold the promise for molecular hydrogen (H(2)) storage by providing nearly ideal binding strength to H(2) for room-temperature applications. Synthesizing such materials, however, faces severe setbacks due to the problem of metal clustering. Inspired by a recent experimental breakthrough ( J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008 , 130 , 6992 ), which demonstrates enhanced H(2) binding in Ti-grafted mesoporous silica, we propose combining the graphene oxide (GO) technique with Ti anchoring to overcome the current synthesis bottleneck for practical storage materials. Similar to silica, GO contains ample hydroxyl groups, which are the active sites for anchoring Ti atoms. GO can be routinely synthesized and is much lighter than silica. Hence, higher gravimetric storage capacity can be readily achieved. Our first-principles computations suggest that GO is primarily made of low-energy oxygen-containing structural motifs on the graphene sheet. The Ti atoms bind strongly to the oxygen sites with binding energies as high as 450 kJ/mol. This is comparable to that of silica and is indeed enough to prevent the Ti atoms from clustering. Each Ti can bind multiple H(2) with the desired binding energies (14-41 kJ/mol-H(2)). The estimated theoretical gravimetric and volumetric densities are 4.9 wt % and 64 g/L, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Materials Modification by Laser, Electron, and Ion Beams, School of Physics and Optoelectronic Technology and College of Advanced Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
Department of Chemistry, Institute for Functional Nanomaterials, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Bhatia S. K. · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 168810.1021/la0523816 ↗
2. Lochan R. C. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 8 · 135710.1039/b515409j ↗
3. Zhao Y. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 155504-1
4. Yildirim T. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 175501-110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.175501 ↗
5. Forster P. M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 1684610.1021/ja0649217 ↗
6. Ma S. Q. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 1173410.1021/ja063538z ↗
7. Dinca M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 1687610.1021/ja0656853 ↗
8. Vitillo J. G. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 838610.1021/ja8007159 ↗
9. Hamaed A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 699210.1021/ja710288g ↗
10. Sun Q. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 1458210.1021/ja0550125 ↗
11. Lee H. · Solid State Commun. · 2008 · 146 · 43110.1016/j.ssc.2008.03.018 ↗
12. Shevlin S. A. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1745610.1021/jp800074n ↗
13. Kim G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 013106-1
14. Meng S. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 66310.1021/nl062692g ↗
15. Zhang C. G. · Chem.—Eur. J. · 2009 · 15 · 591010.1002/chem.200900172 ↗
16. Jung I. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 428310.1021/nl8019938 ↗
17. Mkhoyan K. A. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 105810.1021/nl8034256 ↗
18. Park S. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 57210.1021/nn700349a ↗
19. Chattopadhyay J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 541410.1021/ja711063f ↗
20. Talyzin A. V. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 826810.1002/anie.200802860 ↗
21. Kudin K. N. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 3610.1021/nl071822y ↗
22. Paci J. T. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1809910.1021/jp075799g ↗
23. He H. Y. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 287 · 5310.1016/S0009-2614(98)00144-4 ↗
24. Boukhvalov D. W. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 1069710.1021/ja8021686 ↗
25. Cai W. W. · Science · 2008 · 321 · 181510.1126/science.1162369 ↗
26. Elias D. C. · Science · 2009 · 323 · 61010.1126/science.1167130 ↗
27. It has been suggested that GGA gives a lower limit, while LDA gives an upper limit, to the H2binding energy:
28. Gao Y. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 386220-1
29. Kubas G. J. · Chem. Rev. · 2007 · 107 · 415210.1021/cr050197j ↗
30. Prud’homme, R. K.; Aksay, I. A.; Adamson, D.; Abdala, A.United States Patent Application 20090054272.
31. Kim Y. H. · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 115424-1
32. Lee H. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 056104-1
33. Perdew J. P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
34. Ceperley D. M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1980 · 45 · 56610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 ↗
35. Perdew J. P. · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 23 · 504810.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
36. Blöchl P. E. · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
37. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
38. Methfessel M. · Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 40 · 361610.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗