journal article·2015-04-28Open access

Use of a Lipid-Coated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle Platform for Synergistic Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel Delivery to Human Pancreatic Cancer in Mice

Huan Meng, Meiying Wang, Huiyu Liu, Xiangsheng Liu, Allen Situ, Bobby Wu, Zhaoxia Ji, Chong Hyun Chang, Andre E. Nel

ACS Nano· Volume 9· Issue 4

Abstract

Recently, a commercial albumin-bound paclitaxel (PTX) nanocarrier (Abraxane) was approved as the first new drug for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in almost a decade. PTX improves the pharmaceutical efficacy of the first-line pancreatic cancer drug, gemcitabine (GEM), through suppression of the tumor stroma and inhibiting the expression of the GEM-inactivating enzyme, cytidine deaminase (CDA). We asked, therefore, whether it was possible to develop a mesoporous silica nanoparticle (MSNP) carrier for pancreatic cancer to co-deliver a synergistic GEM/PTX combination. High drug loading was achieved by a custom-designed coated lipid film technique to encapsulate a calculated dose of GEM (40 wt %) by using a supported lipid bilayer (LB). The uniform coating of the 65 nm nanoparticles by a lipid membrane allowed incorporation of a sublethal amount of hydrophobic PTX, which could be co-delivered with GEM in pancreatic cells and tumors. We demonstrate that ratiometric PTX incorporation and delivery by our LB-MSNP could suppress CDA expression, contemporaneous with induction of oxidative stress as the operating principle for PTX synergy. To demonstrate the in vivo efficacy, mice carrying subcutaneous PANC-1 xenografts received intravenous (IV) injection of PTX/GEM-loaded LB-MSNP. Drug co-delivery provided more effective tumor shrinkage than GEM-loaded LB-MSNP, free GEM, or free GEM plus Abraxane. Comparable tumor shrinkage required coadministration of 12 times the amount of free Abraxane. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of tumor-associated GEM metabolites confirmed that, compared to free GEM, MSNP co-delivery increased the phosphorylated DNA-interactive GEM metabolite 13-fold and decreased the inactivated and deaminated metabolite 4-fold. IV injection of MSNP-delivered PTX/GEM in a PANC-1 orthotopic model effectively inhibited primary tumor growth and eliminated metastatic foci. The enhanced in vivo efficacy of the dual delivery carrier could be achieved with no evidence of local or systemic toxicity. In summary, we demonstrate the development of an effective LB-MSNP nanocarrier for synergistic PTX/GEM delivery in pancreatic cancer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Controllable Preparation and Application of Nanomaterials, Research Center for Micro & Nano Materials and Technology, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Cancer Institute

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Cancer Facts & Figures; American Cancer Society, 2014; http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/webcontent/acspc-042151.pdf.
2. Mini E. · Ann. Oncol. · 2006 · 17 · v710.1093/annonc/mdj941 ↗
3. Erkan M. · Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. · 2012 · 9 · 45410.1038/nrgastro.2012.115 ↗
4. Jacobetz M. A. · Gut · 2012 · 62 · 11210.1136/gutjnl-2012-302529 ↗
5. Von Hoff D. D. · N. Engl. J. Med. · 2013 · 369 · 169110.1056/NEJMoa1304369 ↗
6. Frese K. K. · Cancer Discovery · 2012 · 2 · 26010.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0242 ↗
7. Awasthi N. · Carcinogenesis · 2013 · 34 · 236110.1093/carcin/bgt227 ↗
8. Bourzac K. · Nature · 2012 · 491 · S5810.1038/491S58a ↗
9. Federico C. · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2012 · 2012 · 5423
10. Mai W. X. · Integr. Biol. · 2013 · 5 · 1910.1039/c2ib20137b ↗
11. Meng H. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 453910.1021/nn100690m ↗
12. Meng H. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 99410.1021/nn3044066 ↗
13. Meng H. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 413110.1021/nn200809t ↗
14. Meng H. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1269010.1021/ja104501a ↗
15. Meng H. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 3 · 35810.1021/jz300021x ↗
16. Meng H. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 443410.1021/nn103344k ↗
17. Meng H. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 1004810.1021/nn404083m ↗
18. Sackmann E. · Science · 1996 · 271 · 4310.1126/science.271.5245.43 ↗
19. Linseisen F. M. · Biophys. J. · 1997 · 72 · 165910.1016/S0006-3495(97)78811-8 ↗
20. Cauda V. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 248410.1021/nl100991w ↗
21. Ashley C. E. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 217410.1021/nn204102q ↗
22. Argyo C. · Chem. Mater. · 2013 · 26 · 43510.1021/cm402592t ↗
23. Yang Y. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 12 · 441810.1039/b924370d ↗
24. Mackowiak S. A. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 257610.1021/nl400681f ↗
25. van Schooneveld M. M. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 251710.1021/nl801596a ↗
26. Ashley C. E. · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 47610.1038/nmat3042 ↗
27. Liu J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 135410.1021/ja808018y ↗
28. Liu J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 756710.1021/ja902039y ↗
29. Mayer L. · Mol. Interventions · 2007 · 7 · 21610.1124/mi.7.4.8 ↗
30. Baker J. A. R. · Drug Metab. Dispos. · 2013 · 41 · 54110.1124/dmd.112.048769 ↗
31. Lin N. · Acta. Pharmacol. Sin. · 2004 · 12 · 1584
32. Ferrari M. · Nat. Rev. Cancer · 2005 · 5 · 16110.1038/nrc1566 ↗
33. Peer D. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 75110.1038/nnano.2007.387 ↗
34. Zhao F. · Sci. Bull. · 2015 · 60 · 310.1007/s11434-014-0700-0 ↗
35. Hu C. · Ther. Delivery · 2010 · 1 · 32310.4155/tde.10.13 ↗
36. Parhi P. · Drug Discovery Today · 2012 · 17 · 104410.1016/j.drudis.2012.05.010 ↗
37. Ma L. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 951810.1021/nn405674m ↗
38. 10.3402/nano.v1i0.570510.3402/nano.v1i0.5705 ↗
39. Aryal S. · Small · 2010 · 6 · 144210.1002/smll.201000631 ↗
40. Tardi P. · Leuk. Res. · 2009 · 33 · 12910.1016/j.leukres.2008.06.028 ↗
41. Batist G. · Clin. Cancer Res. · 2009 · 15 · 69210.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0515 ↗
42. Aryal S. · Mol. Pharmaceutics · 2011 · 8 · 140110.1021/mp200243k ↗
43. Miao L. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 660110.1002/adfm.201401076 ↗
44. Von Hoff D. D. · J. Clin. Oncol. · 2011 · 29 · 454810.1200/JCO.2011.36.5742 ↗
45. Meng H. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 162010.1021/nn9005973 ↗
46. Nel A. · Science · 2006 · 311 · 62210.1126/science.1114397 ↗
47. Sackmann E. · Trends Biotechnol. · 2000 · 18 · 5810.1016/S0167-7799(99)01412-2 ↗
48. Bayerl T. M. · Biophys. J. · 1990 · 58 · 35710.1016/S0006-3495(90)82382-1 ↗
49. Linseisen F. M. · Biophys. J. · 1997 · 72 · 165910.1016/S0006-3495(97)78811-8 ↗
50. Mornet S. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 28110.1021/nl048153y ↗
51. Roggers R. A. · Mol. Pharmaceutics · 2012 · 9 · 277010.1021/mp200613y ↗
52. Dengler E. C. · J. Controlled Release · 2013 · 168 · 20910.1016/j.jconrel.2013.03.009 ↗
53. Sommerwerk A. · Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. · 2011 · 8 · 1978
54. Ji T. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 350810.1002/adma.201300299 ↗
55. Shipley L. A. · Drug Metab. Dispos. · 1992 · 20 · 84910.1016/S0090-9556(25)08805-1 ↗
56. Shu C. J. · J. Nucl. Med. · 2010 · 51 · 109210.2967/jnumed.109.073361 ↗
57. Moore M. J. · J. Clin. Oncol. · 2007 · 25 · 196010.1200/JCO.2006.07.9525 ↗
58. Zhang C. · Mol. Cancer Ther. · 2011 · 10 · 126410.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-1091 ↗
59. Zhang H. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 434910.1021/nn3010087 ↗
60. DaCosta M. V. · Anal. Chim. Acta · 2014 · 832 · 110.1016/j.aca.2014.04.030 ↗
61. Sugahara K. N. · Science · 2010 · 328 · 103110.1126/science.1183057 ↗
62. von Maltzahn G. · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 54510.1038/nmat3049 ↗
63. Meng H. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 277310.1021/nn100448z ↗