Acoustic Purification of Extracellular Microvesicles
Source abstract
Abstract
Microvesicles (MVs) are an increasingly important source for biomarker discovery and clinical diagnostics. The small size of MVs and their presence in complex biological environment, however, pose technical challenges in sample preparation, particularly when sample volumes are small. We herein present an acoustic nanofilter system that size-specifically separates MVs in a continuous and contact-free manner. The separation uses ultrasound standing waves to exert differential acoustic force on MVs according to their size and density. By optimizing the design of the ultrasound transducers and underlying electronics, we were able to achieve a high separation yield and resolution. The "filter size-cutoff" can be controlled electronically in situ, which enables versatile MV-size selection. We applied the acoustic nanofilter to isolate nanoscale (<200 nm) vesicles from cell culture media as well as MVs in stored red blood cell products. With the capacity for rapid and contact-free MV isolation, the developed system could become a versatile preparatory tool for MV analyses.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Extracellular vesicles in disease · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, CPZN 5206, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
Funding
National Cancer Institute · National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute · National Research Foundation of Korea · Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Thery C. · Nat. Rev. Immunol. · 2009 · 9 · 58110.1038/nri2567 ↗
2. Simpson R. J. · Expert Rev. Proteomics · 2009 · 6 · 26710.1586/epr.09.17 ↗
3. Graner M. W. · FASEB J. · 2009 · 23 · 154110.1096/fj.08-122184 ↗
4. Skog J. · Nat. Cell Biol. · 2008 · 10 · 147010.1038/ncb1800 ↗
5. Balaj L. · Nat. Commun. · 2011 · 2 · 18010.1038/ncomms1180 ↗
6. Valadi H. · Nat. Cell Biol. · 2007 · 9 · 65410.1038/ncb1596 ↗
7. Shao H. · Nat. Med. · 2012 · 18 · 183510.1038/nm.2994 ↗
8. Thery C. · 2006
9. Bruus H. · Lab Chip · 2011 · 11 · 357910.1039/c1lc90058g ↗
10. Yeo L. Y. · Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. · 2014 · 46 · 37910.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141418 ↗
11. Shi J. · Lab Chip · 2009 · 9 · 289010.1039/b910595f ↗
12. Bruus H. · Lab Chip · 2012 · 12 · 101410.1039/c2lc21068a ↗
13. Lenshof A. · Lab Chip · 2012 · 12 · 121010.1039/c2lc21256k ↗
14. Lenshof A. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2010 · 39 · 120310.1039/b915999c ↗
15. Shi J. · Lab Chip · 2009 · 9 · 335410.1039/b915113c ↗
16. Ding X. · Lab Chip · 2012 · 12 · 422810.1039/c2lc40751e ↗
17. Franke T. · Lab Chip · 2010 · 10 · 78910.1039/b915522h ↗
18. Franke T. · Lab Chip · 2009 · 9 · 262510.1039/b906819h ↗
19. Destgeer G. · Lab Chip · 2013 · 13 · 421010.1039/c3lc50451d ↗
20. Nam J. · Lab Chip · 2011 · 11 · 336110.1039/c1lc20346k ↗
21. Vader P. · Trends Mol. Med. · 2014 · 20 · 38510.1016/j.molmed.2014.03.002 ↗
22. Thery C. · Nat. Rev. Immunol. · 2002 · 2 · 56910.1038/nri855 ↗
23. Tissot J. D. · Curr. Opin. Hematol. · 2010 · 17 · 57110.1097/MOH.0b013e32833ec217 ↗
24. Rubin O. · Vox Sang · 2008 · 95 · 28810.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01101.x ↗
25. Rho J. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 1122710.1021/nn405016y ↗
26. EL Andaloussi S. · Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery · 2013 · 12 · 34710.1038/nrd3978 ↗
27. Di Vizio D. · Am. J. Pathol. · 2012 · 181 · 157310.1016/j.ajpath.2012.07.030 ↗
28. Morello M. · Cell Cycle · 2013 · 12 · 352610.4161/cc.26539 ↗
29. Bourquin Y. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. · 2014 · 53 · 558710.1002/anie.201310401 ↗
30. Ding X. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2014 · 1299210.1073/pnas.1413325111 ↗
31. Witwer K. W. · J. Extracell. Vesicles · 2013 · 2 · 2036010.3402/jev.v2i0.20360 ↗