journal article·2019-05-28

Elimination Pathways of Nanoparticles

Wilson Poon, Yi-Nan Zhang, Ben Ouyang, Benjamin R. Kingston, Jamie L. Y. Wu, Stefan Wilhelm, Warren C. W. Chan

ACS Nano· Volume 13· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Understanding how nanoparticles are eliminated from the body is required for their successful clinical translation. Many promising nanoparticle formulations for in vivo medical applications are large (>5.5 nm) and nonbiodegradable, so they cannot be eliminated renally. A proposed pathway for these nanoparticles is hepatobiliary elimination, but their transport has not been well-studied. Here, we explored the barriers that determined the elimination of nanoparticles through the hepatobiliary route. The route of hepatobiliary elimination is usually through the following pathway: (1) liver sinusoid, (2) space of Disse, (3) hepatocytes, (4) bile ducts, (5) intestines, and (6) out of the body. We discovered that the interaction of nanoparticles with liver nonparenchymal cells ( e. g., Kupffer cells and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells) determines the elimination fate. Each step in the route contains cells that can sequester and chemically or physically alter the nanoparticles, which influences their fecal elimination. We showed that the removal of Kupffer cells increased fecal elimination by >10 times. Combining our results with those of prior studies, we can start to build a systematic view of nanoparticle elimination pathways as it relates to particle size and other design parameters. This is critical to engineering medically useful and translatable nanotechnologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada

Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada

MD/PhD Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada

Stephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States

Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States

Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E5, Canada

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada

Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2310/7290.2010.0003110.2310/7290.2010.00031 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11051-010-9911-810.1007/s11051-010-9911-8 ↗
3. 10.1038/nbt92010.1038/nbt920 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0775710.1021/acsnano.7b07757 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.02010.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.020 ↗
6. 10.1038/nbt134010.1038/nbt1340 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41578-018-0038-310.1038/s41578-018-0038-3 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20180784710.1002/anie.201807847 ↗
9. 10.1002/ar.109233040810.1002/ar.1092330408 ↗
10. 10.3109/1061186990908550410.3109/10611869909085504 ↗
11. 10.1016/0378-5173(83)90166-710.1016/0378-5173(83)90166-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/0378-5173(94)90003-510.1016/0378-5173(94)90003-5 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20050052910.1002/adfm.200500529 ↗
14. 10.1073/pnas.070765410510.1073/pnas.0707654105 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.04310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.043 ↗
16. 10.1021/nn403089810.1021/nn4030898 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja907069u10.1021/ja907069u ↗
18. 10.1038/nnano.2013.30910.1038/nnano.2013.309 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20130946410.1002/anie.201309464 ↗
20. Guidance for Industry Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Impaired Hepatic Function: Study Design, Data Analysis, and Impact on Dosing and Labeling. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm072123.pdf (accessed February 15, 2019).
21. 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90012-410.1016/0022-1759(94)90012-4 ↗
22. 10.1073/pnas.171339011410.1073/pnas.1713390114 ↗
23. Sommer, C.; Strähle, C.; Köthe, C. S. U.; Hamprecht, F. A. Ilastik: interactive learning and segmentation toolkit. Proceedings from the Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Chicago, Illinois, March 30–April 2, 2011; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, 2011; pp 230–233. IEEE Xplore. http://www.ieee.org (accessed Jan 16, 2019).10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872394 ↗
24. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
25. 10.1038/nmat471810.1038/nmat4718 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.nano.2016.01.01310.1016/j.nano.2016.01.013 ↗
27. 10.1186/1743-8977-4-1010.1186/1743-8977-4-10 ↗
28. 10.1186/1476-5926-1-110.1186/1476-5926-1-1 ↗
29. 10.1038/gt.2008.6010.1038/gt.2008.60 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.00910.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.009 ↗
31. 10.1021/nl900031y10.1021/nl900031y ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.02910.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.029 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.taap.2010.02.01310.1016/j.taap.2010.02.013 ↗
34. 10.1055/s-2007-100733610.1055/s-2007-1007336 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08851.x10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08851.x ↗
36. 10.1002/hep.51026022310.1002/hep.510260223 ↗
37. 10.1038/ni.269110.1038/ni.2691 ↗
38. 10.1002/hep.184021033710.1002/hep.1840210337 ↗
39. 10.1002/hep.184006050510.1002/hep.1840060505 ↗
40. 10.1073/pnas.161640011310.1073/pnas.1616400113 ↗
41. 10.1073/pnas.161930211410.1073/pnas.1619302114 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41467-018-06271-510.1038/s41467-018-06271-5 ↗
43. 10.1002/adfm.20170463410.1002/adfm.201704634 ↗
44. 10.1073/pnas.77.7.403010.1073/pnas.77.7.4030 ↗
45. 10.1021/mp300559v10.1021/mp300559v ↗
46. 10.1016/0730-725X(91)90412-F10.1016/0730-725X(91)90412-F ↗
47. 10.1016/j.nano.2018.07.01310.1016/j.nano.2018.07.013 ↗
48. 10.1038/physci241020a010.1038/physci241020a0 ↗