Comparison Study of Gold Nanohexapods, Nanorods, and Nanocages for Photothermal Cancer Treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
Gold nanohexapods represent a novel class of optically tunable nanostructures consisting of an octahedral core and six arms grown on its vertices. By controlling the length of the arms, their localized surface plasmon resonance peaks could be tuned from the visible to the near-infrared region for deep penetration of light into soft tissues. Herein we compare the in vitro and in vivo capabilities of Au nanohexapods as photothermal transducers for theranostic applications by benchmarking against those of Au nanorods and nanocages. While all these Au nanostructures could absorb and convert near-infrared light into heat, Au nanohexapods exhibited the highest cellular uptake and the lowest cytotoxicity in vitro for both the as-prepared and PEGylated nanostructures. In vivo pharmacokinetic studies showed that the PEGylated Au nanohexapods had significant blood circulation and tumor accumulation in a mouse breast cancer model. Following photothermal treatment, substantial heat was produced in situ and the tumor metabolism was greatly reduced for all these Au nanostructures, as determined with (18)F-flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT). Combined together, we can conclude that Au nanohexapods are promising candidates for cancer theranostics in terms of both photothermal destruction and contrast-enhanced diagnosis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States
Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
Laboratory of Optical Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Kennedy L. C. · Small · 2011 · 7 · 16910.1002/smll.201000134 ↗
2. Frangioni J. V. · Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. · 2003 · 7 · 62610.1016/j.cbpa.2003.08.007 ↗
3. Barone P. W. · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 8610.1038/nmat1276 ↗
4. Jain P. K. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2008 · 41 · 157810.1021/ar7002804 ↗
5. O’Neal D. P. · Cancer Lett. · 2004 · 209 · 17110.1016/j.canlet.2004.02.004 ↗
6. Zheng X. H. · Mol. Pharmaceutics · 2012 · 9 · 51410.1021/mp200526m ↗
7. Li D. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2009 · 42 · 13510.1021/ar800080n ↗
8. Hu M. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2006 · 35 · 108410.1039/b517615h ↗
9. Huang X. Q. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 2810.1038/nnano.2010.235 ↗
10. Moon H. K. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 370710.1021/nn900904h ↗
11. Kim J. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 68810.1038/nnano.2009.231 ↗
12. Li M. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 172210.1002/adma.201104864 ↗
13. Yang K. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 331810.1021/nl100996u ↗
14. Sepulveda B. · Nano Today · 2009 · 4 · 24410.1016/j.nantod.2009.04.001 ↗
15. Nam J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1363910.1021/ja902062j ↗
16. Bardhan R. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2011 · 44 · 93610.1021/ar200023x ↗
17. Chen J. · Small · 2010 · 6 · 81110.1002/smll.200902216 ↗
18. Huang X. H. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 211510.1021/ja057254a ↗
19. Ye E. Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 850610.1021/ja202832r ↗
20. Azzazy H. M. E. · Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. · 2012 · 50 · 193
21. Pilot Study of AuroLase Therapy in Refractory and/or Recurrent Tumors of the Head and Neck.http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00848042(accessed January 2013) .
22. 10.1177/109158181246596910.1177/1091581812465969 ↗
23. Grabinski C. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 287010.1021/nn103476x ↗
24. Hao F. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 72910.1021/nl062969c ↗
25. Goodrich G. P. · J. Biomed. Opt. · 2010 · 15 · 01800110.1117/1.3290817 ↗
26. Van de Broek B. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 431910.1021/nn1023363 ↗
27. Hasan W. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 155510.1021/nl803647n ↗
28. Kim D. Y. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 797210.1002/anie.201104814 ↗
29. Kumar P. S. · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 01560610.1088/0957-4484/19/01/015606 ↗
30. Cho E. C. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 902310.1021/jp903343p ↗
31. Optical Absorption of Indocyanine Green.http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/icg/index.html.
32. Nikoobakht B. · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 195710.1021/cm020732l ↗
33. Sau T. K. · Langmuir · 2004 · 20 · 641410.1021/la049463z ↗
34. Skrabalak S. E. · Nat. Protoc. · 2007 · 2 · 218210.1038/nprot.2007.326 ↗
35. Zhang Q. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 639610.1021/jp100354z ↗
36. Cho E. C. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 38510.1038/nnano.2011.58 ↗
37. Walkey C. D. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 213910.1021/ja2084338 ↗
38. Nativo P. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 163910.1021/nn800330a ↗
39. Hauck T. S. · Small · 2008 · 4 · 15310.1002/smll.200700217 ↗
40. Song K. H. · J. Biomed. Opt. · 2007 · 12 · 06050310.1117/1.2818045 ↗
41. Wang Y. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 588010.1021/nn300464r ↗