Modeling High-Efficiency Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
With energy conversion efficiencies in continuous growth, quantum dot sensitized solar cells (QDSCs) are currently under an increasing interest, but there is an absence of a complete model for these devices. Here, we compile the latest developments in this kind of cells in order to attain high efficiency QDSCs, modeling the performance. CdSe QDs have been grown directly on a TiO(2) surface by successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction to ensure high QD loading. ZnS coating and previous growth of CdS were analyzed. Polysulfide electrolyte and Cu(2)S counterelectrodes were used to provide higher photocurrents and fill factors, FF. Incident photon-to-current efficiency peaks as high as 82%, under full 1 sun illumination, were obtained, which practically overcomes the photocurrent limitation commonly observed in QDSCs. High power conversion efficiency of up to 3.84% under full 1 sun illumination (V(oc) = 0.538 V, j(sc) = 13.9 mA/cm(2), FF = 0.51) and the characterization and modeling carried out indicate that recombination has to be overcome for further improvement of QDSC.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Photovoltaic and Optoelectronic Devices Group, Departament de Física, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló, Spain
Current address: Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversions, CAS, 510640 Guangzhou, P.R. China.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Itzhaik Y. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 425410.1021/jp900302b ↗
2. Lévy-Clément C. · Adv. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 151210.1002/adma.200401848 ↗
3. O’ Regan B. · Nature · 1991 · 353 · 73710.1038/353737a0 ↗
4. Kamat P. V. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1873710.1021/jp806791s ↗
5. Yu W. · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 285410.1021/cm034081k ↗
6. Vogel R. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1994 · 98 · 318310.1021/j100063a022 ↗
7. Vogel R. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1990 · 174 · 24110.1016/0009-2614(90)85339-E ↗
8. Buhbut S. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 129310.1021/nn100021b ↗
9. Shalom M. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 113410.1021/jz1002555 ↗
10. Mora-Seró I. · Small · 2010 · 6 · 22110.1002/smll.200901494 ↗
11. Mora-Seró I. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 675510.1021/jp100591m ↗
12. Fan S.-Q. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 06350110.1063/1.3313948 ↗
13. Lee Y.-L. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 60410.1002/adfm.200800940 ↗
14. Mora-Seró I. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2009 · 42 · 184810.1021/ar900134d ↗
15. Hodes G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1777810.1021/jp803310s ↗
16. Lee H. J. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 422110.1021/nl902438d ↗
17. Robel I. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 238510.1021/ja056494n ↗
18. Giménez S. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 29520410.1088/0957-4484/20/29/295204 ↗
19. Shen Q. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 08430410.1063/1.2903059 ↗
20. Niitsoo O. · J. Photochem. Photobiol., A · 2006 · 181 · 30610.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.12.012 ↗
21. Hodes G. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1980 · 127 · 54410.1149/1.2129709 ↗
22. Fabregat-Santiago F. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2005 · 87 · 11710.1016/j.solmat.2004.07.017 ↗
23. Bisquert J. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 32510.1021/jp011941g ↗
24. Bisquert J. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 5 · 536010.1039/b310907k ↗
25. Barea E. M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 683410.1021/ja101752d ↗
26. Impedance Spectroscopy Test.www.istest.eu.
27. Bisquert J. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 45010.1021/jz900297b ↗
28. Bisquert J. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 1727810.1021/jp9037649 ↗
29. Bisquert J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 1355010.1021/ja047311k ↗
30. Lee Y.-L. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 60410.1002/adfm.200800940 ↗