journal article·2011-12-27

Electrochemical Delamination of CVD-Grown Graphene Film: Toward the Recyclable Use of Copper Catalyst

Yu Wang, Yi Zheng, Xiangfan Xu, Emilie Dubuisson, Qiaoliang Bao, Jiong Lu, Kian Ping Loh

ACS Nano· Volume 5· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The separation of chemical vapor deposited (CVD) graphene from the metallic catalyst it is grown on, followed by a subsequent transfer to a dielectric substrate, is currently the adopted method for device fabrication. Most transfer techniques use a chemical etching method to dissolve the metal catalysts, thus imposing high material cost in large-scale fabrication. Here, we demonstrate a highly efficient, nondestructive electrochemical route for the delamination of CVD graphene film from metal surfaces. The electrochemically delaminated graphene films are continuous over 95% of the surface and exhibit increasingly better electronic quality after several growth cycles on the reused copper catalyst, due to the suppression of quasi-periodical nanoripples induced by copper step edges. The electrochemical delamination process affords the advantages of high efficiency, low-cost recyclability, and minimal use of etching chemicals.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Semiconductor materials and devices · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 3, 117543 Singapore

Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, 2 Science Drive 3, 117542 Singapore

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Neto A. H. C. · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
2. Geim A. K. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 18310.1038/nmat1849 ↗
3. Li X. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 131210.1126/science.1171245 ↗
4. Kim K. · Nature · 2009 · 457 · 70610.1038/nature07719 ↗
5. Reina A. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 308710.1021/nl901829a ↗
6. Bae S. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 57410.1038/nnano.2010.132 ↗
7. Li X. S. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 435910.1021/nl902623y ↗
8. Lee Y. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 49010.1021/nl903272n ↗
9. Giovannetti G. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 02680310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.026803 ↗
10. Gao L. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 351210.1021/nl1016706 ↗
11. Schabel M. C. · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 718510.1103/PhysRevB.46.7185 ↗
12. de Jongh P. E. · Chem. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 351210.1021/cm991054e ↗
13. Thimsen E. · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 45610.1038/nmat3017 ↗
14. Saito R. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 02740110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.027401 ↗
15. Casiraghi C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 23310810.1063/1.2818692 ↗
16. Ando T. · J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 2006 · 75 · 07471610.1143/JPSJ.75.074716 ↗
17. Ni Z. H. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 386810.1021/nl101399r ↗
18. Wehling T. O. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 05680210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.056802 ↗
19. Efetov D. K. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 25680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.256805 ↗
20. Katsnelson M. I. · Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A · 2008 · 366 · 19510.1098/rsta.2007.2157 ↗
21. Castro E. V. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 26660110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.266601 ↗