Graphene as a Long-Term Metal Oxidation Barrier: Worse Than Nothing
Source abstract
Abstract
Anticorrosion and antioxidation surface treatments such as paint or anodization are a foundational component in nearly all industries. Graphene, a single-atom-thick sheet of carbon with impressive impermeability to gases, seems to hold promise as an effective anticorrosion barrier, and recent work supports this hope. We perform a complete study of the short- and long-term performance of graphene coatings for Cu and Si substrates. Our work reveals that although graphene indeed offers effective short-term oxidation protection, over long time scales it promotes more extensive wet corrosion than that seen for an initially bare, unprotected Cu surface. This surprising result has important implications for future scientific studies and industrial applications. In addition to informing any future work on graphene as a protective coating, the results presented here have implications for graphene's performance in a wide range of applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Semiconductor materials and devices · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Center of Integrated Nanomechanical Systems, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Novoselov K. S. · Science · 2004 · 306 · 66610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
2. Li X. S. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 131210.1126/science.1171245 ↗
3. Bunch J. S. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 245810.1021/nl801457b ↗
4. Nair R. R. · Science · 2012 · 335 · 44210.1126/science.1211694 ↗
5. Leenaerts O. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 19310710.1063/1.3021413 ↗
6. Liu L. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 196510.1021/nl0808684 ↗
7. Surwade S. P. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 2060010.1021/jp306537y ↗
8. Reina A. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 3010.1021/nl801827v ↗
9. Coraux J. · New J. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 110.1088/1367-2630/11/2/023006 ↗
10. Xue Y. Z. · Nano Res. · 2011 · 4 · 120810.1007/s12274-011-0171-4 ↗
11. Chen S. S. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 132110.1021/nn103028d ↗
12. Prasai D. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 110210.1021/nn203507y ↗
13. Topsakal M. · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 15544510.1103/PhysRevB.85.155445 ↗
14. Raman R. K. S. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 404010.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.048 ↗
15. Kirkland N. T. · Corros. Sci. · 2012 · 56 · 110.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.003 ↗
16. Kim K. · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 24543310.1103/PhysRevB.83.245433 ↗
17. Liu N. · Nano Res. · 2011 · 4 · 99610.1007/s12274-011-0156-3 ↗
18. Chae S. J. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 232810.1002/adma.200803016 ↗
19. Kim K. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 214210.1021/nn1033423 ↗
20. Ferrari A. C. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 ↗
21. Iijima J. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2006 · 253 · 282510.1016/j.apsusc.2006.05.063 ↗
22. Zahran R. R. · Mater. Lett. · 1996 · 28 · 23710.1016/0167-577X(94)00095-6 ↗
23. Yoon T. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 144810.1021/nl204123h ↗
24. Keil P. · Corros. Sci. · 2010 · 52 · 130510.1016/j.corsci.2009.12.012 ↗
25. Morita M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1989 · 55 · 56210.1063/1.102435 ↗
26. Schriver M. · Solid State Commun. · 2010 · 150 · 56110.1016/j.ssc.2010.01.013 ↗
27. Li X. M. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 274310.1002/adma.200904383 ↗
28. Regan W. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 430010.1021/nl3020022 ↗
29. Gannett W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 24210510.1063/1.3599708 ↗
30. Ni Z. H. · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 2010 · 41 · 47910.1002/jrs.2485 ↗