Defect-Dominated Doping and Contact Resistance in MoS2
Source abstract
Abstract
Achieving low resistance contacts is vital for the realization of nanoelectronic devices based on transition metal dichalcogenides. We find that intrinsic defects in MoS2 dominate the metal/MoS2 contact resistance and provide a low Schottky barrier independent of metal contact work function. Furthermore, we show that MoS2 can exhibit both n-type and p-type conduction at different points on a same sample. We identify these regions independently by complementary characterization techniques and show how the Fermi level can shift by 1 eV over tens of nanometers in spatial resolution. We find that these variations in doping are defect-chemistry-related and are independent of contact metal. This raises questions on previous reports of metal-induced doping of MoS2 since the same metal in contact with MoS2 can exhibit both n- and p-type behavior. These results may provide a potential route for achieving low electron and hole Schottky barrier contacts with a single metal deposition.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Novoselov K. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 1045110.1073/pnas.0502848102 ↗
2. Lee Y. H. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 232010.1002/adma.201104798 ↗
3. Shi Y. M. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 278410.1021/nl204562j ↗
4. Thimsen E. · Chem. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 31310.1021/cm3027225 ↗
5. Yu Y. · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 186610.1038/srep01866 ↗
6. Ismach A. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 637810.1021/nn301940k ↗
7. Liu H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 15211510.1063/1.3703595 ↗
8. Colombo L. · Proc. IEEE · 2013 · 101 · 153610.1109/JPROC.2013.2260114 ↗
9. Wang Q. H. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 69910.1038/nnano.2012.193 ↗
10. Radisavljevic B. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 14710.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
11. Michaelson H. B. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1977 · 48 · 472910.1063/1.323539 ↗
12. Das S. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 100
13. Neal, A.; Liu, H.; Gu, J.; Ye, P.InMetal Contacts to MoS2: A Two-Dimensional Semiconductor; 70th Annual Device Research Conference (DRC), 2012; pp65–66.10.1109/DRC.2012.6256928 ↗
14. Liu H. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 856310.1021/nn303513c ↗
15. Jena D. · Proc. IEEE · 2013 · 7 · 158510.1109/JPROC.2013.2253435 ↗
16. Seabaugh A. C. · Proc. IEEE · 2010 · 98 · 209510.1109/JPROC.2010.2070470 ↗
17. Fuhrer M. S. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 14610.1038/nnano.2013.30 ↗
18. Radisavljevic B. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 14710.1038/nnano.2013.31 ↗
19. Wang H. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 467410.1021/nl302015v ↗
20. Qiu H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 12310410.1063/1.3696045 ↗
21. Baugher B. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 421210.1021/nl401916s ↗
22. Liu H. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 264010.1021/nl400778q ↗
23. Gourmelon E. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 118210.1063/1.372061 ↗
24. Bao W. Z. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 04210410.1063/1.4789365 ↗
25. Maurel C. · Surf. Sci. · 2006 · 600 · 44210.1016/j.susc.2005.10.042 ↗
26. Monch W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 72 · 189910.1063/1.121220 ↗
27. SPI Supplies,http://www.2spi.com/.
28. Yin Z. Y. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 7410.1021/nn2024557 ↗
29. Li H. · Small · 2012 · 8 · 6310.1002/smll.201101016 ↗
30. Kim S. · Nat. Commun. · 2012 · 3 · 101110.1038/ncomms2018 ↗
31. Fontana M. · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 163410.1038/srep01634 ↗
32. Bertolazzi S. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 324610.1021/nn3059136 ↗
33. Huang X. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 193410.1039/c2cs35387c ↗
34. Wu J. · Small · 2013 · 9 · 331410.1002/smll.201301542 ↗
35. Li H. · Small · 2012 · 8 · 68210.1002/smll.201101958 ↗
36. Sik Hwang W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 04311610.1063/1.4789975 ↗
37. Wilson J. A. · Adv. Phys. · 1969 · 18 · 19310.1080/00018736900101307 ↗
38. Neudeck G. W. · 1989 · 2
39. Chan J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 12350710.1063/1.4799277 ↗
40. Schroder D. K. · 2006
41. Wagner C. D. · 1979
42. Zhou W. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 261510.1021/nl4007479 ↗
43. Inoue A. · J. Electron Spectrosc. · 2013 · 189 · 1110.1016/j.elspec.2012.12.005 ↗
44. Spalvins T. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 1987 · 5 · 21210.1116/1.574106 ↗
45. Gong C. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 12371110.1063/1.3524232 ↗
46. Giovannetti G. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 02680310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.026803 ↗
47. Bagus P. S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 09610410.1103/PhysRevLett.89.096104 ↗
48. Ranade, P.; Choi, Y.K.; Ha, D.; Agarwal, A.; Ameen, M.; King, T.J.InTunable Work Function Molybdenum Gate Technology for FDSOI-CMOS; 2002 Electron Devices Meeting, 2002; pp363–366.10.1109/IEDM.2002.1175853 ↗
49. Ward’s Science,https://wardsci.com/.
50. Herrera-Gomez A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 101410.1063/1.1494121 ↗
51. Wallace R. M. · 2008 · 16 · 255