journal article·2014-03-25

Defect-Dominated Doping and Contact Resistance in MoS2

Stephen McDonnell, Rafik Addou, Creighton Buie, Robert M. Wallace, Christopher L. Hinkle

ACS Nano· Volume 8· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Achieving low resistance contacts is vital for the realization of nanoelectronic devices based on transition metal dichalcogenides. We find that intrinsic defects in MoS2 dominate the metal/MoS2 contact resistance and provide a low Schottky barrier independent of metal contact work function. Furthermore, we show that MoS2 can exhibit both n-type and p-type conduction at different points on a same sample. We identify these regions independently by complementary characterization techniques and show how the Fermi level can shift by 1 eV over tens of nanometers in spatial resolution. We find that these variations in doping are defect-chemistry-related and are independent of contact metal. This raises questions on previous reports of metal-induced doping of MoS2 since the same metal in contact with MoS2 can exhibit both n- and p-type behavior. These results may provide a potential route for achieving low electron and hole Schottky barrier contacts with a single metal deposition.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Novoselov K. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 1045110.1073/pnas.0502848102 ↗
2. Lee Y. H. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 232010.1002/adma.201104798 ↗
3. Shi Y. M. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 278410.1021/nl204562j ↗
4. Thimsen E. · Chem. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 31310.1021/cm3027225 ↗
5. Yu Y. · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 186610.1038/srep01866 ↗
6. Ismach A. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 637810.1021/nn301940k ↗
7. Liu H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 15211510.1063/1.3703595 ↗
8. Colombo L. · Proc. IEEE · 2013 · 101 · 153610.1109/JPROC.2013.2260114 ↗
9. Wang Q. H. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 69910.1038/nnano.2012.193 ↗
10. Radisavljevic B. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 14710.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
11. Michaelson H. B. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1977 · 48 · 472910.1063/1.323539 ↗
12. Das S. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 100
13. Neal, A.; Liu, H.; Gu, J.; Ye, P.InMetal Contacts to MoS2: A Two-Dimensional Semiconductor; 70th Annual Device Research Conference (DRC), 2012; pp65–66.10.1109/DRC.2012.6256928 ↗
14. Liu H. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 856310.1021/nn303513c ↗
15. Jena D. · Proc. IEEE · 2013 · 7 · 158510.1109/JPROC.2013.2253435 ↗
16. Seabaugh A. C. · Proc. IEEE · 2010 · 98 · 209510.1109/JPROC.2010.2070470 ↗
17. Fuhrer M. S. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 14610.1038/nnano.2013.30 ↗
18. Radisavljevic B. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 14710.1038/nnano.2013.31 ↗
19. Wang H. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 467410.1021/nl302015v ↗
20. Qiu H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 12310410.1063/1.3696045 ↗
21. Baugher B. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 421210.1021/nl401916s ↗
22. Liu H. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 264010.1021/nl400778q ↗
23. Gourmelon E. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 118210.1063/1.372061 ↗
24. Bao W. Z. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 04210410.1063/1.4789365 ↗
25. Maurel C. · Surf. Sci. · 2006 · 600 · 44210.1016/j.susc.2005.10.042 ↗
26. Monch W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 72 · 189910.1063/1.121220 ↗
27. SPI Supplies,http://www.2spi.com/.
28. Yin Z. Y. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 7410.1021/nn2024557 ↗
29. Li H. · Small · 2012 · 8 · 6310.1002/smll.201101016 ↗
30. Kim S. · Nat. Commun. · 2012 · 3 · 101110.1038/ncomms2018 ↗
31. Fontana M. · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 163410.1038/srep01634 ↗
32. Bertolazzi S. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 324610.1021/nn3059136 ↗
33. Huang X. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 193410.1039/c2cs35387c ↗
34. Wu J. · Small · 2013 · 9 · 331410.1002/smll.201301542 ↗
35. Li H. · Small · 2012 · 8 · 68210.1002/smll.201101958 ↗
36. Sik Hwang W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 04311610.1063/1.4789975 ↗
37. Wilson J. A. · Adv. Phys. · 1969 · 18 · 19310.1080/00018736900101307 ↗
38. Neudeck G. W. · 1989 · 2
39. Chan J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 12350710.1063/1.4799277 ↗
40. Schroder D. K. · 2006
41. Wagner C. D. · 1979
42. Zhou W. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 261510.1021/nl4007479 ↗
43. Inoue A. · J. Electron Spectrosc. · 2013 · 189 · 1110.1016/j.elspec.2012.12.005 ↗
44. Spalvins T. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 1987 · 5 · 21210.1116/1.574106 ↗
45. Gong C. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 12371110.1063/1.3524232 ↗
46. Giovannetti G. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 02680310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.026803 ↗
47. Bagus P. S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 09610410.1103/PhysRevLett.89.096104 ↗
48. Ranade, P.; Choi, Y.K.; Ha, D.; Agarwal, A.; Ameen, M.; King, T.J.InTunable Work Function Molybdenum Gate Technology for FDSOI-CMOS; 2002 Electron Devices Meeting, 2002; pp363–366.10.1109/IEDM.2002.1175853 ↗
49. Ward’s Science,https://wardsci.com/.
50. Herrera-Gomez A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 101410.1063/1.1494121 ↗
51. Wallace R. M. · 2008 · 16 · 255