Sulphate resistance of type V cements with limestone filler and natural pozzolana
Source abstract
Abstract
Sulphate performance of concrete depends primarily on permeability. Under severe conditions of sulphate exposure, low-permeability concrete is prescribed and it must also be made with high sulphate resisting cement. For portland cement, the sulphate resistance depends on the C3A content and the amount of CH produced at early stages of hydration. Some parameters that modify the quantity of early CH in the hardened cement paste are investigated in this paper. Two type V cements with quite different C3S content and blended cements containing natural pozzolana or limestone filler were used. Expansion, flexural and compressive strength of mortar, immersed until 1 yr in sodium sulphate solution, with pH-controlled are presented. Results show that the sulphate performance of portland cement with high C3S content is very poor compared with low C3S portland cement. Addition of natural pozzolana provides the maximum sulphate resistance while the addition of 20% limestone filler declining sulphate performance of low C3A cements. This behaviour can be attributed to the reaction between sulphate ions with CH into the paste that produces an alteration of the predominant mechanism of sulphate attack.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. CIRSOC 201, Project, design and execution of reinforced and prestressed concrete. Argentina, Buenos Aires: INTI, 1983
2. ACI Committee 201, Guide to durable concrete. ACI Mater J 1991;88(5):544–82
3. CEB, Durability of concrete structures – Design guide. Barcelona, Spain, 1992
4. Building Research Establishment, Sulphate and acid resistance of concrete in the ground, Digest No. 363, Watford, UK: Garston, 1991
5. Swenson EG, Mackenzie CJ. Contributions of T. Thorvaldson to cement and concrete research. In: Swenson EG, editor. Performance of concrete. University of Toronto Press, 1968, p. 3–1710.3138/9781487584092-002 ↗
6. Pomeroy D. Concrete durability: from basic research to practical reality. In: Concrete durability – Katharine and Bryant Mather International Conference, ACI SP-100. Detroit, MI: American Concrete Institute, 1987;1:111–30
7. Mechanism of expansion associated with ettringite formation10.1016/0008-8846(73)90056-2 ↗
8. Stark D. Long-time study of concrete durability in sulfate soils. In: Sulfate resistance of concrete, ACI SP 77. Detroit, MI, 1982:21–40
9. Influence of fly ash on the sulfate resistance of concrete
10. Sulfate resistance of a Canadian slag cement
11. Influence of finely ground limestone on cement hydration10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00020-1 ↗
12. Ingram K, Daugherty K. Limestone additions to portland cement: uptake, chemistry and effects. In: Proceedings of the ninth International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, New Delhi, India, 1992, II p. 181–86
13. Sulfate attack on concrete with mineral admixtures10.1016/0008-8846(95)00195-6 ↗
14. The development of ASTM method C1012 with recommended acceptance limits for sulfate resistance of hydraulic cements10.1520/CCA10549J ↗
15. Ettringite formation in low C3A portland cement exposed to sodium sulfate solution10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00093-8 ↗
16. Crammond NJ, Halliwell MA. The thaumasite form of sulfate attack in concretes containing a source of carbonate ions – a microstructural overview. In: Malhotra VM, editor. Proceeding of the Second CANMET/ACI International Symposium on Advances in Concrete Technology, ACI SP-154, Detroit: MI, 1995. p. 357–80
17. A new test for sulfate resistance of cement10.1520/JTE11684J ↗
18. An evaluation of the sulfate resistance of cements in a controlled environment10.1016/0008-8846(81)90030-2 ↗
19. Influence of cement composition on the corrosion of reinforcement and sulfate resistance of concrete
20. The effect of cement composition and pH of environment on sulfate resistance of portland cements and blended cements10.1016/S0958-9465(97)00011-5 ↗
21. Effect of limestone filler on the sulfate resistance of low C3A portland cement10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00144-6 ↗
22. Calcareous filler and the compressive strength of portland cement10.1016/0008-8846(76)90099-5 ↗
23. Klemm W, Adams, L. An investigation of the formation of carboaluminate. In: Hooton RD, editor. Carbonate additions to cement. ASTM STP 1064, Philadelfia, 1990:60–7210.1520/STP23472S ↗
24. Vernet C, Noworyta G. Mechanism of limestone fillers reactions in the system (C3A–CSH2–CH–CC–H). In: Proceedings of the ninth International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, New Delhi, India, 1992. p. 430–36
25. Bonavetti V. Limestone filler cements: interaction mechanism and its influence on mechanical properties. M.Sc. thesis, University of Center Buenos Aires State, 1998, p. 242
26. Powers TC. The non-evaporable water content of hardened portland cement paste. ASTM Bull 1949;158:68–76