Interfacial Engineering Enabled the Tunability of Organic Spin Polarization
Source abstract
Abstract
Organic charge-transfer ferromagnets have been studied for many years, and numerous breakthroughs have been made pertaining to them. However, the mechanism underlying the phenomenon is still unclear. Herein, we designed organic charge-transfer ferromagnets using different small molecule acceptors to investigate the key factors determining ferromagnetic performance. We found that the electron–phonon (e–p) coupling of the acceptors affects the interfacial interaction, which in turn changes the strength of ferromagnetism. Under an external magnetic field, the e–p coupling in the acceptors intensifies, yielding a weak interfacial spin–dipole interaction. The charge-transfer ferromagnets exhibited magnetic anisotropy due to the difference in the spatial structure symmetry of acceptors. Overall, this study deepens the understanding of interfacial interactions in organic charge-transfer ferromagnets, providing a new perspective for designing organic ferromagnets.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetism in coordination complexes · Organic and Molecular Conductors Research · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
Funding
Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province · Shandong University · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province · Shandong Province Outstanding Youth Foundation
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20180491710.1002/adma.201804917 ↗
2. 10.1088/0034-4885/73/5/05650110.1088/0034-4885/73/5/056501 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.03720310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.037203 ↗
4. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/03/03521410.1088/0953-8984/20/03/035214 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.07542610.1103/PhysRevB.75.075426 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.07.00610.1016/j.chempr.2018.07.006 ↗
7. 10.1021/ja209107u10.1021/ja209107u ↗
8. 10.1002/adma20130163510.1002/adma201301635 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.22720110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.227201 ↗
10. 10.1038/3509952710.1038/35099527 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11433-018-9328-710.1007/s11433-018-9328-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.02.02410.1016/j.chempr.2019.02.024 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20210810310.1002/adma.202108103 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0355810.1021/acsnano.5b03558 ↗
15. 10.1021/nn500323j10.1021/nn500323j ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20140339610.1002/adma.201403396 ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.150126410.1126/sciadv.1501264 ↗
18. 10.1002/adom.20210120110.1002/adom.202101201 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0040410.1021/acsnano.2c00404 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.10122910.1016/j.apmt.2021.101229 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41427-021-00291-210.1038/s41427-021-00291-2 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41528-021-00120-010.1038/s41528-021-00120-0 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja410263410.1021/ja4102634 ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20160966710.1002/anie.201609667 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20171210410.1002/anie.201712104 ↗
26. 10.1038/nphys139910.1038/nphys1399 ↗
27. 10.1038/nnano.2014.23510.1038/nnano.2014.235 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.13720310.1103/PhysRevLett.117.137203 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0098810.1021/acsnano.9b00988 ↗
30. 10.1002/adom.20190057810.1002/adom.201900578 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.499630810.1063/1.4996308 ↗
32. 10.1038/nchem.59110.1038/nchem.591 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b0048310.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00483 ↗
34. 10.1038/nnano.2013.17710.1038/nnano.2013.177 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c0034910.1021/acs.accounts.0c00349 ↗
36. 10.1142/S201032471440013X10.1142/S201032471440013X ↗
37. Devreese J. T. · arXiv · 2010 · arXiv:1012.4576