Heavy Doping-Induced Phase Segregation and Heterojunction Formation
Source abstract
Abstract
Elucidating the atomic arrangement of dopant states at high doping concentrations is crucial for understanding structure–property relationships in materials. On the atomic scale, closely connected interfaces, particularly coherent interfaces, can effectively suppress interface-induced trapping processes. Although not yet experimentally verified, heavy doping holds promise for generating heterojunctions within host materials. This study combines spherical aberration-corrected electron microscopy and first-principles calculations to reveal that, at low doping concentrations (1%), Bi primarily occupies W sites, resulting in substitutional doping. However, at high doping concentrations (>10%), we have identified the formation of a β-Bi 2 O 3 phase within the WO 3 host. The formation of these heterojunctions can effectively facilitate electron transfer due to favorable band alignment and potential energy differences between Bi 2 O 3 and WO 3 . The findings of this study are crucial for rethinking the atomic structures of dopant states at high doping concentrations and their potential application in the development of heterojunctions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry
Technical University of Denmark
Department of Energy Conversion and Storage
School of Materials Science and Engineering
Hefei University of Technology
Funding
Villum Fonden
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/0471725560.ch210.1002/0471725560.ch2 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0060810.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00608 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0298910.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02989 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.02.02410.1016/j.jechem.2022.02.024 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.157912010.1063/1.1579120 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-018-04954-710.1038/s41467-018-04954-7 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-018-07080-610.1038/s41467-018-07080-6 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8TA11457A10.1039/C8TA11457A ↗
9. 10.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-310.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0110509510.1007/BF01105095 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-020-15087-110.1038/s41467-020-15087-1 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-023-38730-z10.1038/s41467-023-38730-z ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c0116810.1021/acs.cgd.2c01168 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.37209810.1063/1.372098 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.140216010.1063/1.1402160 ↗
16. 10.1179/02670839977300278210.1179/026708399773002782 ↗
17. 10.1039/C4CS00126E10.1039/C4CS00126E ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20130437310.1002/adma.201304373 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.aal203810.1126/science.aal2038 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20130321410.1002/adfm.201303214 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20220143610.1002/aenm.202201436 ↗
22. 10.1007/s40820-023-01046-010.1007/s40820-023-01046-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15319410.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153194 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.solmat.2007.01.02610.1016/j.solmat.2007.01.026 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ceja.2020.10007010.1016/j.ceja.2020.100070 ↗
26. Pennycook S. J. · 201110.1007/978-1-4419-7200-2 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0270710.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02707 ↗
28. 10.1017/S143192761101207410.1017/S1431927611012074 ↗
29. 10.1002/cphc.20110052710.1002/cphc.201100527 ↗
30. Callister W. D. · 2020
31. Smith W. F. · 2006
32. 10.1016/j.mssp.2017.08.03510.1016/j.mssp.2017.08.035 ↗
33. 10.1039/C4TA06235C10.1039/C4TA06235C ↗
34. 10.1021/jacs.8b0529310.1021/jacs.8b05293 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20180248610.1002/adma.201802486 ↗
36. 10.1098/rspa.1959.000310.1098/rspa.1959.0003 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.14610.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.146 ↗
38. 10.3390/ma1511378610.3390/ma15113786 ↗