Machine Learning-Driven Screening of Atomically Precise Pure Metal Nanoclusters for Oxygen Reduction
Source abstract
Abstract
Developing efficient catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells is challenging due to high power density and durability requirements. Subnanometer clusters (SNCs) show promise, but their fluxional behavior and complex structure–activity relationships hinder catalyst design. We combine density functional theory (DFT) and machine learning (ML) to study transition metal-based subnanometer nanoclusters (TMSNCs) ranging from 3 to 30 atoms, aiming to establish structure activity relationship (SAR) for ORR. Subdividing the data set based on size and periodic groups significantly improves the accuracy of our ML models. Importantly, the ML model predicting the ORR catalytic performance is validated through DFT calculations, identifying 12 promising catalysts. Late group TMSNCs exhibit enhanced ORR activity, reflected in a noticeable shift toward Au/Ag metals on the volcano plot. This underscores the importance of investigating late group TMSNCs alongside Pt for the ORR. ML accelerates TMSNC design, surpassing computational screening and advancing catalyst development.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry
Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Indore
Funding
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India · University Grants Commission · Science and Engineering Research Board · Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences · Ministry of Education, India
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/catal612019710.3390/catal6120197 ↗
2. 10.1021/ef501977k10.1021/ef501977k ↗
3. 10.1002/fuce.20070005310.1002/fuce.200700053 ↗
4. 10.1021/ic902248610.1021/ic9022486 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature1111510.1038/nature11115 ↗
6. 10.1021/cr050200z10.1021/cr050200z ↗
7. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.03510.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.035 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0046210.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 ↗
9. 10.1021/cs300227s10.1021/cs300227s ↗
10. 10.1039/b912552c10.1039/b912552c ↗
11. 10.1002/celc.20150042510.1002/celc.201500425 ↗
12. 10.1039/C7TA00685C10.1039/C7TA00685C ↗
13. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0219810.1021/acsaem.2c02198 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp512588r10.1021/jp512588r ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0065910.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00659 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0399610.1021/acsaem.1c03996 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms834310.1038/ncomms8343 ↗
18. 10.1039/C6CY00750C10.1039/C6CY00750C ↗
19. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0207510.1021/acsanm.1c02075 ↗
20. 10.1039/C3NR04750D10.1039/C3NR04750D ↗
21. 10.1021/jp206360e10.1021/jp206360e ↗
22. 10.1039/C6CY01709F10.1039/C6CY01709F ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b1148310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11483 ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20150447310.1002/anie.201504473 ↗
25. 10.1021/ja405922m10.1021/ja405922m ↗
26. 10.1038/nchem.28810.1038/nchem.288 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0368010.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03680 ↗
28. 10.1002/jcc.2672510.1002/jcc.26725 ↗
29. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0040910.1021/acscatal.7b00409 ↗
30. 10.1039/C7CP02240A10.1039/C7CP02240A ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0692410.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06924 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0092910.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00929 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.patter.2022.10055310.1016/j.patter.2022.100553 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
36. Pedregosa F. · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2011 · 12 · 2825
37. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0626510.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06265 ↗
38. 10.21105/joss.0538810.21105/joss.05388 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0339210.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03392 ↗
40. 10.1039/D4TA01312C10.1039/D4TA01312C ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0190710.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01907 ↗
42. 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-910.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20200365410.1002/anie.202003654 ↗
44. 10.1021/jp047349j10.1021/jp047349j ↗