Comparative Analysis of Reactivity of Al and Ga Doped Garnet Solid State Electrolyte at the Interface with Li Metal
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium garnet (Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12, LLZO) based solid electrolytes are leading candidate materials for all-solid-state batteries with lithium metal anodes because of their high ionic conductivity, high mechanical toughness, and superior electrochemical stability. While doping LLZO with Al and Ga increases its ionic conductivity by stabilizing the cubic phase, the impact of dopants on its (electro)chemical stability at the interfaces with Li metal is critical. Our study of differences between Al- and Ga-doped LLZO when interfaced with lithium metal using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and density functional theory shows a higher propensity of Ga to move across LLZO interface with Li metal and form Ga–Li alloy. Neutron diffraction reveals loss of cubic phase resulting from the loss of dopant that explains electrochemical behavior differences between Ga- and Al-doped LLZO. Overall, our study reveals the key role of dopant chemistry in enabling stable solid electrolyte materials for all-solid-state batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), TU München, 85748 Garching, Germany
Applied Materials Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States
Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, 250 68 Řež, Czech Republic
Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
Funding
Vehicle Technologies Office · US German Cooperation on Energy Storage
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.04810.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 ↗
2. 10.1039/b925553b10.1039/b925553b ↗
3. 10.1039/c4cs00020j10.1039/c4cs00020j ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0011510.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.9b0253710.1021/acsami.9b02537 ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20200268910.1002/aenm.202002689 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0266810.1021/acsenergylett.9b02668 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20070114410.1002/anie.200701144 ↗
9. 10.1021/ic101914e10.1021/ic101914e ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0102310.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01023 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.00710.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.007 ↗
12. 10.1002/aenm.20180344010.1002/aenm.201803440 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41563-021-01019-x10.1038/s41563-021-01019-x ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-020-17493-x10.1038/s41467-020-17493-x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.11110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.111 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.6b1390210.1021/acsami.6b13902 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.13110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.131 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssi.2011.10.02210.1016/j.ssi.2011.10.022 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ssi.2015.04.01110.1016/j.ssi.2015.04.011 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0036210.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00362 ↗
21. 10.1039/D1TA10215J10.1039/D1TA10215J ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.9b1268510.1021/jacs.9b12685 ↗
23. 10.1002/advs.20160051710.1002/advs.201600517 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0386910.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03869 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.0c0860510.1021/acsami.0c08605 ↗
26. 10.3390/cryst1107072110.3390/cryst11070721 ↗
27. 10.1039/D2TA09250F10.1039/D2TA09250F ↗