Insights of the Proton Transport Efficiency of a Membrane Electrode Assembly by Operando Monitoring of the Local Proton Concentration during Water Oxidation
Source abstract
Abstract
Direct estimation of the reaction environment, e.g., local pH at the anode side of a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) of zero gap electrolyzer, is essential to understand possible key factors, which are influencing the sustainable operation of industrial electrolyzers. Herein, we demonstrate a scanning electrochemical microscopy-based strategy to measure the local pH in the close vicinity of an operating MEA. Local proton concentration changes during the oxygen evolution reaction were monitored in the nonzero gap electrolyzer and MEA systems. The measurements constitute a methodology to evaluate the ion transport efficiency of the MEA. The strategy was extended to investigate the effect of an activation process, buffering of the electrolyte, and poisoning effect on the change in proton transport efficiency. This novel strategy enables the estimation of the actual pH of the MEA system during operation and is of great relevance in understanding the process conditions during sustainable fuel production.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Analytical Chemistry─Center for Electrochemical Sciences (CES), Faculty of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, D-44780 Bochum, Germany
Funding
HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Bundesministerium f?r Forschung und Technologie · H2020 European Research Council
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/D0EE01760D10.1039/D0EE01760D ↗
2. 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.10083210.1016/j.coelec.2021.100832 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-021-22296-910.1038/s41467-021-22296-9 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41929-018-0085-610.1038/s41929-018-0085-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.00510.1016/j.joule.2021.05.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.11810.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.118 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.13310.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.133 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.11110.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.111 ↗
9. 10.1002/celc.20190075910.1002/celc.201900759 ↗
10. 10.1002/celc.20210122310.1002/celc.202101223 ↗
11. 10.1021/ac951225910.1021/ac9512259 ↗
12. 10.1149/2.022209jes10.1149/2.022209jes ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b0570810.1021/acs.analchem.9b05708 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c0291910.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02919 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b0495210.1021/acs.analchem.9b04952 ↗
16. 10.1021/jacsau.1c0028910.1021/jacsau.1c00289 ↗
17. 10.1002/smsc.20230028310.1002/smsc.202300283 ↗
18. 10.1002/chem.20210038710.1002/chem.202100387 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0529510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05295 ↗
20. 10.1002/cssc.20200188610.1002/cssc.202001886 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.04.00710.1016/j.jiec.2019.04.007 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.15710.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.157 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.pecs.2021.10092410.1016/j.pecs.2021.100924 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.1c2184910.1021/acsami.1c21849 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22861710.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228617 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22675510.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226755 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.10.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.10.001 ↗