Efficiency Roll-off Suppression in Solution-Processed Organic Light-Emitting Diodes through a Bipolar Host Design
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, we address the persistent challenges faced by solution-processed organic light-emitting diodes (s-OLEDs), particularly in terms of low efficiency and significant efficiency roll-off attributed primarily to defects formed during solution processing. Our strategic approach involved the design of three soluble host materials (SiDBFDBA, SiDBTDBA, and SiPhCzDBA) by incorporating a 5,9-dioxa-13 b -boranaphtho[3,2,1- de ]anthracene (DBA)-based electron acceptor unit, along with electron donor units, namely dibenzofuran (DBF), dibenzothiophene (DBT), and N -phenyl carbazole (PhCz). Notably, the introduction of DBF as an electron donor unit revealed suboptimal electron-donating characteristics, which prompted the incorporation of a p-type host material to achieve a high efficiency of 33.7 cd/A and 23.7%, which is one of the highest EQEs among phosphorescent red s-OLEDs reported. Conversely, DBT and PhCz exhibited enhanced electron-donating effects, which resulted in a significant improvement in efficiency roll-off. Understanding these characteristic distinctions and their correlation with roll-off behavior on the basis of device efficiency provides valuable insights for future directions in creating new hosts to enhance stability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Information Display, College of Sciences, Kyung Hee University, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
Department of Chemistry and RIMA
Gyeongsang National University
Department of Materials Engineering and Convergence
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.orgel.2021.10634610.1016/j.orgel.2021.106346 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20150310810.1002/adma.201503108 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.10762110.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107621 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.09.00910.1016/j.orgel.2018.09.009 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.02.01410.1016/j.dyepig.2017.02.014 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.0c0659710.1021/acsami.0c06597 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.00310.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.003 ↗
8. 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.59910.1103/RevModPhys.65.599 ↗
9. 10.5194/acp-18-6331-201810.5194/acp-18-6331-2018 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1401002610.3390/polym14010026 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b0065610.1021/acs.jcim.9b00656 ↗
12. 10.1039/D1TC05470H10.1039/D1TC05470H ↗
13. 10.1039/C6TC01270A10.1039/C6TC01270A ↗
14. 10.1039/D0TC00893A10.1039/D0TC00893A ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.9b0674910.1021/acsami.9b06749 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2015.01.03510.1016/j.jlumin.2015.01.035 ↗
17. 10.1039/C7TC00145B10.1039/C7TC00145B ↗
18. 10.1039/C6TC01270A10.1039/C6TC01270A ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20200529210.1002/adfm.202005292 ↗
20. 10.1039/C9MH00373H10.1039/C9MH00373H ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.12532810.1103/PhysRevB.75.125328 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1096710.1103/PhysRevB.62.10967 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.7b0355710.1021/acsami.7b03557 ↗
24. 10.1002/admi.20180162710.1002/admi.201801627 ↗
25. 10.1039/C8TC01435C10.1039/C8TC01435C ↗
26. 10.1039/D1RA04855D10.1039/D1RA04855D ↗