journal article·2024-07-01

Recent Progress and Challenges in Hybrid Water Electrolysis through Economic Evaluation

Hyogyun Roh, Sehun Oh, Changhyun Lim, Kijung Yong

ACS Materials Letters· Volume 6· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Water electrolysis is a sustainable method of hydrogen production with low levels of CO 2 emissions. However, the problem of high economic costs must be resolved. Hybrid water electrolysis (HWE), derived by replacing the sluggish oxygen evolution reaction, emerges as an alternative method to reduce power consumption. Recent studies on HWEs have focused on reporting cell potential reductions, but their impact on hydrogen production costs is still unclear. In this paper, power consumption and levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) were evaluated to understand the economic impact of HWEs. Among various HWEs, HzOR showed an excellent energy consumption reduction (43.3 kWh/kg) resulting in the lowest LCOH ($1.92 kg –1 ). These results prove one of the most effective alternatives to water electrolysis in its current state. Although other HWEs show only small reductions in energy consumption and LCOH in their current state, these reactions still show high potential to reduce energy consumption and LCOH.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Surface Chemistry Laboratory of Electronic Materials (SCHEMA), Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 790-784, Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C8EE02079E10.1039/C8EE02079E ↗
2. U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. National Clean Hydrogen Strategy and Roadmap; 2023. https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/docs/hydrogenprogramlibraries/pdfs/us-national-clean-hydrogen-strategy-roadmap.pdf.
3. IRENA. Green Hydrogen Cost Reduction: Scaling up Electrolysers to Meet the 1.5C Climate Goal; 2020. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Dec/IRENA_Green_hydrogen_cost_2020.pdf.
4. 10.1016/j.rser.2023.11376310.1016/j.rser.2023.113763 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.01210.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.012 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.17910.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.179 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.16410.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.164 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20230630910.1002/adma.202306309 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.aad499810.1126/science.aad4998 ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20237001510.1002/aenm.202370015 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.3c1086710.1021/acsnano.3c10867 ↗
12. 10.1002/ange.20201436210.1002/ange.202014362 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20231176610.1002/adma.202311766 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20200882310.1002/adma.202008823 ↗
15. 10.1039/C6CS00328A10.1039/C6CS00328A ↗
16. 10.1039/D1TA02149D10.1039/D1TA02149D ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12043410.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120434 ↗
18. 10.1021/acscatal.3c0505110.1021/acscatal.3c05051 ↗
19. 10.1002/smll.20230427410.1002/smll.202304274 ↗
20. 10.1039/D3EE02467A10.1039/D3EE02467A ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.2c0098210.1021/acsami.2c00982 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15495110.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154951 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15552010.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155520 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14231410.1016/j.cej.2023.142314 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20230699510.1002/adfm.202306995 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12238810.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122388 ↗
27. 10.1039/D3TA03991A10.1039/D3TA03991A ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20170416910.1002/adfm.201704169 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14399510.1016/j.cej.2023.143995 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12266410.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122664 ↗
31. 10.1002/celc.20220009210.1002/celc.202200092 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-023-36142-710.1038/s41467-023-36142-7 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0091910.1021/acsaem.3c00919 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12117010.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121170 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0457510.1021/acsanm.1c04575 ↗
36. 10.1002/anie.20230670110.1002/anie.202306701 ↗
37. 10.1021/jacs.3c1438110.1021/jacs.3c14381 ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20221190910.1002/adfm.202211909 ↗
39. 10.1002/anie.20220089910.1002/anie.202200899 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467-021-22250-910.1038/s41467-021-22250-9 ↗
41. 10.1039/D0CS01079K10.1039/D0CS01079K ↗
42. Hydrogen Council. Path to Hydrogen Competitiveness: A Cost Perspective; 2020. www.hydrogencouncil.com.
43. IONOMR. Hydrgen Production Cost by AEM White Paper; 2020. https://ionomr.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/FM-7024-A-Hydrogen-Production-Cost-by-AEM-White-Paper-copy.pdf.
44. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.18110.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.181 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.20410.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.204 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23381910.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233819 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13394210.1016/j.cej.2021.133942 ↗
48. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0411710.1021/acscatal.1c04117 ↗
49. 10.1039/D3MH00872J10.1039/D3MH00872J ↗
50. 10.1002/adfm.20221065610.1002/adfm.202210656 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10799410.1016/j.jece.2022.107994 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.07610.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.076 ↗
53. 10.1007/s40820-023-01150-110.1007/s40820-023-01150-1 ↗