Best Practices for Evaluating New Materials as Adsorbents for Water Treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
Water pollution is becoming a major concern, because of the increasing numbers and concentrations of persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic anthropogenic pollutants in fresh water resources. Many recent studies have considered new adsorbents to remove these emerging contaminants from water resources, including metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent-organic frameworks (COFs), porous organic polymers (POPs), porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs), porous cyclodextrin-based polymers, and many others. These materials systems incorporate elements of molecular design to target specific pollutants, and many have porosity and high surface areas that provide rapid uptake and high capacity. Although they represent timely and important advances in materials design and synthesis, the characterization of their adsorption performance is sometimes not relevant for water treatment, insufficient, or implemented in ways that prevent comparison to the state-of-the-art materials. This Perspective scrutinizes common practices in the recent literature and provides guidance for designing conclusive and effective adsorption experiments with novel adsorbents. Efforts to adhere to these best practices will allow researchers to evaluate novel adsorbents effectively and will facilitate the emergence of general design criteria for the removal of emerging contaminants from water. Proper experimental design can give crucial insights for understanding adsorption mechanisms, as well as enabling comparisons among different studies, which will better contribute to solving current and future water quality problems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
Funding
U.S. Department of Defense · Cyclopure, Inc.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b0449310.1021/acs.analchem.5b04493 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.18610.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.186 ↗
3. 10.1002/em.2058510.1002/em.20585 ↗
4. 10.1177/096032710809450910.1177/0960327108094509 ↗
5. 10.1002/tox.2074810.1002/tox.20748 ↗
6. Grassi M. · 2012 · 1510.1007/978-94-007-3916-1_2 ↗
7. 10.1021/cr300133d10.1021/cr300133d ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0079710.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00797 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20190901410.1002/adfm.201909014 ↗
10. 10.1039/C9CS00827F10.1039/C9CS00827F ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.8b0695810.1021/jacs.8b06958 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c0000710.1021/acs.accounts.0c00007 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20180802710.1002/adma.201808027 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0068710.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00687 ↗
15. 10.1038/nature1618510.1038/nature16185 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c0024010.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00240 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.11487410.1016/j.watres.2019.114874 ↗
18. 10.1039/C5RA02714D10.1039/C5RA02714D ↗
19. 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.05810.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b0048810.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00488 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41893-018-0046-810.1038/s41893-018-0046-8 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.aaa807510.1126/science.aaa8075 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b0016310.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00163 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.01.02410.1016/j.jtice.2017.01.024 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.01310.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b0065910.1021/acs.estlett.9b00659 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0127910.1021/acs.est.7b01279 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.19710.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.197 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00328-510.1016/S0008-6223(98)00328-5 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b0055610.1021/acs.estlett.8b00556 ↗
31. 10.1038/srep4095510.1038/srep40955 ↗
32. Kumar A. · 2017 · 4310.1016/B978-0-08-100557-6.00003-1 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.04410.1016/j.cej.2015.05.044 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.06210.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.062 ↗
35. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1990.tb06907.x10.1002/j.1551-8833.1990.tb06907.x ↗
36. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.11595010.1016/j.watres.2020.115950 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)00612-410.1016/S0927-7757(01)00612-4 ↗
38. 10.1021/ja405495u10.1021/ja405495u ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0262610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02626 ↗
40. 10.1039/D0CS00997K10.1039/D0CS00997K ↗
41. Webb P. A. · 1997
42. Roque-Malherbe R. M. · 2018
43. 10.1007/BF0048656410.1007/BF00486564 ↗
44. ASTM Standard D 4607-86 (90) · 1994 · 15.01
45. 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.12.02010.1016/j.jaap.2011.12.020 ↗
46. 10.1038/nprot.2006.37010.1038/nprot.2006.370 ↗
47. Faust S. D. · 2013
48. Worch E. · 201210.1515/9783110240238 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cis.2009.07.00910.1016/j.cis.2009.07.009 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.11010.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.110 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.09.01010.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.09.010 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.01210.1016/j.watres.2019.02.012 ↗
53. 10.1021/es800118410.1021/es8001184 ↗
54. 10.1021/es00054a01710.1021/es00054a017 ↗
55. 10.1039/D0EW00405G10.1039/D0EW00405G ↗
56. 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.02910.1016/j.watres.2018.10.029 ↗
57. 10.1029/WR022i003p0027110.1029/WR022i003p00271 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0491110.1021/acs.est.6b04911 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.05410.1016/j.watres.2013.03.054 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0166610.1021/acs.est.0c01666 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.16610.1016/j.cej.2017.10.166 ↗
62. 10.1021/acs.est.5b0080210.1021/acs.est.5b00802 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c0042610.1021/acs.accounts.0c00426 ↗
64. 10.1246/cl.12123910.1246/cl.121239 ↗