Electrochemical CO 2 Mineralization and H 2 Generation from Steel and Coal Waste
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide We introduce a process that electrochemically couples CO 2 capture and mineralization (CCM) with water electrolysis (WE). Leveraging the exothermicity of CO 2 mineralization to sustain a reverse pH gradient, this approach lowers the potential required for WE by up to 0.39 V. Demonstration in a three-chamber reactor yields a steady-state pH gradient of 4.4, enabling WE at an onset of 1.30 V and Faradaic efficiency for CO 2 fixation of 93%, corresponding to a net energy cost of < 0.5 kWh (kg CO 2 ) –1 . Abundant waste streams, including steel slag and coal ash, serve as CO 2 sorbents, resulting in waste valorization to synthetic calcite. Accounting for the value of calcite, estimated H 2 production costs are < 1 USD kg –1 . Because CO 2 fixation exceeds grid emissions for the equivalent electrical energy consumption, this process produces carbon-negative H 2 using immediately available electricity. At scale, this process has the potential to mitigate > 500 Mt CO 2 emissions annually.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron and Steelmaking Processes · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes · Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
The Ohio State University
Funding
National Science Foundation · Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) · 2022
2. Lan X. · Trends in globally-averaged CO2 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements. Version 05-Feb-2026 · 2026
3. 10.1073/pnas.101225310810.1073/pnas.1012253108 ↗
4. 10.1039/c7ee02342a10.1039/c7ee02342a ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0251310.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02513 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.117673110.1126/science.1176731 ↗
7. 10.1021/am507465f10.1021/am507465f ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15095410.1016/j.cej.2024.150954 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.03010.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.04110.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.041 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.12136810.1016/j.memsci.2023.121368 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ces.2009.01.05510.1016/j.ces.2009.01.055 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.04010.1016/j.rser.2017.09.040 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.10416110.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104161 ↗
15. 10.1039/D0EE03382K10.1039/D0EE03382K ↗
16. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.10.01810.1016/j.joule.2023.10.018 ↗
17. 10.1039/D2CS00443G10.1039/D2CS00443G ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-025-65332-810.1038/s41467-025-65332-8 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsenergylett.5c0020010.1021/acsenergylett.5c00200 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41586-023-06060-110.1038/s41586-023-06060-1 ↗
21. 10.1039/D3EE01606D10.1039/D3EE01606D ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-025-59732-z10.1038/s41467-025-59732-z ↗
23. 10.1039/C9EE02412C10.1039/C9EE02412C ↗
24. 10.1039/D3EE03024E10.1039/D3EE03024E ↗
25. World Steel Association · 2025
26. World Steel Association · 2025
27. Sultana S. · 2021 · 38110.1007/978-3-030-68502-7_15 ↗
28. 10.3390/en1801005210.3390/en18010052 ↗
29. 10.1021/ja407115p10.1021/ja407115p ↗
30. 10.1038/ncomms684810.1038/ncomms6848 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41570-016-000310.1038/s41570-016-0003 ↗
32. 10.1021/acscatal.5c0685510.1021/acscatal.5c06855 ↗
33. 10.1039/D3SC00897E10.1039/D3SC00897E ↗
34. Intratec Solutions · Calcium Carbonate Prices · 2025
35. Sudarshan Group · 2023
36. O'Hayre R. · 2016 · 2510.1002/9781119191766.ch2 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.01810.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018 ↗
38. IEA · 2023
39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · 2024
40. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy · 2023