Li + /H + Exchange in Solid-State Oxide Li-Ion Conductors
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Understanding the moisture stability of oxide Li-ion conductors is important for their practical applications in solid-state batteries. Unlike sulfide or halide conductors, oxide conductors generally better resist degradation when in contact with water but can still undergo topotactic Li + /H + exchange (LHX). Here, we combine density functional theory (DFT) calculations with a machine-learning interatomic potential model to investigate the thermodynamic driving force of the LHX reaction for two representative oxide Li-ion conductor families: garnets and NASICONs. Li-stuffed garnets exhibit a strong driving force for proton exchange due to their high Li chemical potential. In contrast, NASICONs demonstrate a higher resistance against proton exchange due to the lower Li chemical potential and the lower O–H bond covalency for polyanion-bonded oxygens. Our findings reveal a critical trade-off: Li stuffing enhances conductivity but increases moisture susceptibility. This study underscores the importance of designing Li-ion conductors that possess both high conductivity and high stability in practical environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Sciences Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
University of California
Funding
Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology · National Renewable Energy Laboratory · National Science Foundation
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/cssc.20210117810.1002/cssc.202101178 ↗
2. 10.1039/D3MA00901G10.1039/D3MA00901G ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0104210.1021/acsenergylett.3c01042 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467-024-47071-410.1038/s41467-024-47071-4 ↗
5. 10.1039/D1TA10228A10.1039/D1TA10228A ↗
6. 10.1039/C4CP02921F10.1039/C4CP02921F ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c0073810.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00738 ↗
8. 10.1021/cm101438x10.1021/cm101438x ↗
9. 10.1021/cm201512710.1021/cm2015127 ↗
10. 10.1021/ic402326b10.1021/ic402326b ↗
11. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0172310.1021/acsaem.8b01723 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20140812410.1002/anie.201408124 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.11.01010.1016/j.ssi.2014.11.010 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b1069410.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10694 ↗
15. 10.1021/cm101438x10.1021/cm101438x ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.0c1601610.1021/acsami.0c16016 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.abq134610.1126/science.abq1346 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0233010.1021/acs.jpcc.3c02330 ↗
19. 10.1039/C7TA03162A10.1039/C7TA03162A ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0048610.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00486 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.07610.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.076 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.05810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.058 ↗
23. 10.1039/c4cs00020j10.1039/c4cs00020j ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20210143710.1002/aenm.202101437 ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms1589310.1038/ncomms15893 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.6b1130110.1021/jacs.6b11301 ↗
27. 10.1039/C4TA04570J10.1039/C4TA04570J ↗
28. 10.1002/smtd.20180006410.1002/smtd.201800064 ↗
29. 10.1002/smll.20210749110.1002/smll.202107491 ↗
30. 10.1021/ic400577v10.1021/ic400577v ↗
31. 10.1039/C4CP02938K10.1039/C4CP02938K ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0158210.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01582 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.05910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.059 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.23543810.1103/PhysRevB.85.235438 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41467-019-08494-610.1038/s41467-019-08494-6 ↗
36. 10.1038/s42256-023-00716-310.1038/s42256-023-00716-3 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41563-025-02272-010.1038/s41563-025-02272-0 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0167-2738(96)00565-610.1016/S0167-2738(96)00565-6 ↗
40. 10.1016/0167-2738(86)90183-910.1016/0167-2738(86)90183-9 ↗
41. 10.1002/aenm.20240359610.1002/aenm.202403596 ↗
42. 10.1021/je049548210.1021/je0495482 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ssi.2016.05.01610.1016/j.ssi.2016.05.016 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-024-53731-210.1038/s41467-024-53731-2 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.0c2314410.1021/acsami.0c23144 ↗
46. 10.1021/cm200949v10.1021/cm200949v ↗
47. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0214110.1021/acsenergylett.2c02141 ↗
48. 10.1126/science.aax352010.1126/science.aax3520 ↗
49. 10.1016/0378-7753(89)80153-310.1016/0378-7753(89)80153-3 ↗
50. 10.1038/nchem.252410.1038/nchem.2524 ↗
51. Mishra, T. P.; Li, Z.; Shen, M. Investigating the Degradation of LATP Solid Electrolyte in High Alkaline Li-O 2 Batteries. arXiv:2508.08654 (cond-mat.mtrl-sci) 2025–08–12,10.48550/arXiv.2508.0865410.48550/arXiv.2508.08654 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10901210.1016/j.corsci.2020.109012 ↗
53. 10.1016/0022-4596(90)90307-J10.1016/0022-4596(90)90307-J ↗
54. 10.1021/cr300186210.1021/cr3001862 ↗
55. 10.1038/s41578-024-00715-910.1038/s41578-024-00715-9 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41563-022-01222-410.1038/s41563-022-01222-4 ↗