journal article·2026-01-09

Unveiling Li + Partitioning Thermodynamics in Electrolysis-Driven Li Metal Recovery

Zhenglong Li, Wen Song

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 11· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Securing a reliable lithium (Li) metal supply is vital for future energy needs. Electrolysis-based approaches show promise for Li recovery from brine, but the incorporation of hybrid electrolytes complicates Li + transport across immiscible phases. Here, we develop a two-chamber electrolysis cell with a Li + -selective membrane separating synthetic brine anolytes from dimethyl carbonate (DMC) catholytes with varying hexafluorophosphate (LiPF 6 ) concentrations. Real-time inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analyses combined with finite element analysis (FEA) elucidate the thermodynamics of Li + transport at the brine/DMC interface. We find that [PF 6 ] − counterions in DMC are essential for Li recovery by maintaining charge neutrality and enabling Li + mass transfer. However, excess Li + in the DMC suppresses Li + partitioning from brine (low partitioning coefficient, K = ∼0.15) and drives back-diffusion, undermining recovery efficiency. These findings highlight that effective electrolysis-based Li recovery requires both appropriate counterions and maintaining the concentration ratio ( C DMC: C brine ) below K .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Extraction and Separation Processes · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Subsurface Energy and the Environment

University of Texas at Austin

Funding

Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Office

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00360-010.1016/S0013-4686(98)00360-0 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.04810.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0055110.1021/acsenergylett.1c00551 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.02310.1016/j.rser.2011.11.023 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.08.03110.1016/j.seppur.2016.08.031 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20241195710.1002/anie.202411957 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.01.00510.1016/j.hydromet.2018.01.005 ↗
8. Garrett D. E. · 2004
9. 10.1073/pnas.241003312110.1073/pnas.2410033121 ↗
10. 10.1039/D4EW00422A10.1039/D4EW00422A ↗
11. 10.1016/j.watres.2022.11882210.1016/j.watres.2022.118822 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.desal.2013.02.01410.1016/j.desal.2013.02.014 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0244210.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02442 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.00610.1016/j.joule.2018.07.006 ↗
15. 10.1039/D1CP01609A10.1039/D1CP01609A ↗
16. 10.1039/C3EE40795K10.1039/C3EE40795K ↗
17. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0040610.1021/acsaem.8b00406 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.2c0431910.1021/acsami.2c04319 ↗
19. 10.1039/D1EE00354B10.1039/D1EE00354B ↗
20. 10.1126/science.aay867210.1126/science.aay8672 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10800-009-9797-210.1007/s10800-009-9797-2 ↗
22. 10.1149/2.0531410jes10.1149/2.0531410jes ↗