Can ChatGPT and Other AI Bots Serve as Peer Reviewers?
Source abstract
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEEditorialNEXTCan ChatGPT and Other AI Bots Serve as Peer Reviewers?Jillian M. BuriakJillian M. BuriakDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G2, CanadaMore by Jillian M. Buriakhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9567-4328, Mark C. HersamMark C. HersamMaterials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3108, United StatesMore by Mark C. Hersamhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-1426, and Prashant V. KamatPrashant V. KamatDepartments of Chemistry & Biochemistry and Chemistry & Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556-5674, United StatesMore by Prashant V. Kamathttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2465-6819Cite this: ACS Energy Lett. 2024, 9, 1, 191–192Publication Date (Web):December 19, 2023Publication History Received29 November 2023Accepted29 November 2023Published online19 December 2023Published inissue 12 January 2024https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02586https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02586editorialACS PublicationsCopyright © 2023 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views10330Altmetric-Citations3LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (2 MB) Get e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (1)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Biological databases,Mathematical methods,Nanomaterials,Quality management,Testing and assessment Get e-Alerts
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G2, Canada
Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3108, United States
Departments of Chemistry & Biochemistry and Chemistry & Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556-5674, United States
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/d41586-023-03144-w10.1038/d41586-023-03144-w ↗
2. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0154410.1021/acsnano.3c01544 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0282810.1021/acsenergylett.2c02828 ↗
4. 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z ↗
5. 10.1038/d41586-023-00191-110.1038/d41586-023-00191-1 ↗
6. 10.1021/jacs.3c0581910.1021/jacs.3c05819 ↗
7. Irfanullah, H. Ending Human-Dependent Peer Review. The Scholarly Kitchen, Sept 29, 2023. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/09/29/ending-human-dependent-peer-review/ (accessed Oct 26, 2023).
8. 10.48550/arXiv.2310.0178310.48550/arXiv.2310.01783 ↗
9. 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00290-610.1016/S1473-3099(23)00290-6 ↗
10. 10.48550/arXiv.2309.1235610.48550/arXiv.2309.12356 ↗
11. Kendrick, C. The Efficacy of ChatGPT: Is it Time for the Librarians to Go Home? The Scholarly Kitchen, Jan 26, 2023. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/01/26/guest-post-the-efficacy-of-chatgpt-is-it-time-for-the-librarians-to-go-home/
12. Lauer, M.; Constant, S.; Wernimont, A. Using AI in Peer Review Is a Breach of Confidentiality. NIH Extramural Nexus, June 23, 2023. https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2023/06/23/using-ai-in-peer-review-is-a-breach-of-confidentiality/
13. Cousins, B. Uncovering The Different Types Of ChatGPT Bias. Forbes, Mar 31, 2023. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2023/03/31/uncovering-the-different-types-of-chatgpt-bias/?sh=1f3f022c571b
14. Davis, P. Did ChatGPT Just Lie To Me? The Scholarly Kitchen, JJan 13, 2023. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/01/13/did-chatgpt-just-lie-to-me/