journal article·2021-03-26Open access

Comparative Technoeconomic Analysis of Renewable Generation of Methane Using Sunlight, Water, and Carbon Dioxide

Alex J. Welch, Ibadillah A. Digdaya, Ron Kent, Paul Ghougassian, Harry A. Atwater, Chengxiang Xiang

Abstract

Thirty-one percent of the primary energy consumed in the United States comes from the burning of natural gas, 70–90% of which is composed of methane (CH₄). Natural gas is recovered from onshore and offshore natural gas and oil wells and from coal beds. Currently, the United States has enough supply of dry natural gas to sustain current consumption for 92 years. Meanwhile, California consumes 2.14 MMcf (43.2 million tons) of natural gas per year, over a quarter of which is used to generate electric power and which provides approximately 40% of the electrical energy in the state. Because an extensive nationwide storage and distribution network already exists for natural gas, the development of renewable CH₄ could enable rapid and widespread distribution of zero-carbon energy services. Thus, for California to meet its renewable portfolio standard, that is, 60% renewable energy for electricity generation by 2030, and to conserve a limited resource, it is imperative to assess how to develop and deploy technologies for renewable generation of CH₄ in the next decade.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Liquid Sunlight Alliance, Department of Applied Physics and Material Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States

Southern California Gas Company, 555 West Fifth Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · Resnick Sustainability Institute for Science, Energy and Sustainability, California Institute of Technology · National Science Foundation

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. U.S. Energy Information Administration · 2020
2. United States Energy Information Administration · 2020
3. U.S. Energy Information Administration · 2020
4. United States Energy Information Administration · 2020
5. California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program · 2018
6. 10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.03010.1016/j.rser.2019.06.030 ↗
7. AgSTAR · 2020
8. American Biogas Council · 2015
9. GMI. Successful Applications of Anaerobic Digestion From Across the World · 2013
10. National Renewable Energy Laboratory · 2018
11. 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.07.00910.1016/j.jcou.2019.07.009 ↗
12. 10.1039/C5EE02573G10.1039/C5EE02573G ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.00610.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41560-019-0326-110.1038/s41560-019-0326-1 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.02.02010.1016/j.ijggc.2018.02.020 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0179310.1021/acs.iecr.9b01793 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b0287410.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02874 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.03010.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.030 ↗
19. Chou, V.; Iyengar, A. K. S.; Shah, V.; Woods, M.Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants: Report Number DOE/NETL-2007/1281; 2015.
20. Fout T. · 201510.2172/1480987 ↗
21. 10.1021/es301953k10.1021/es301953k ↗
22. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.02.00710.1016/j.joule.2020.02.007 ↗
23. 10.1073/pnas.190233511610.1073/pnas.1902335116 ↗
24. 10.1039/c2ee03393c10.1039/c2ee03393c ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.10.00710.1016/j.ijggc.2017.10.007 ↗
26. 10.1021/ie502128x10.1021/ie502128x ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b0258610.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02586 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41467-020-18232-y10.1038/s41467-020-18232-y ↗
29. Wichelns D. · 2010
30. LADWP · 2019
31. Water Corporation · 2009
32. 10.1002/9780470276280.ch310.1002/9780470276280.ch3 ↗
33. 10.1093/ijlct/ctz07210.1093/ijlct/ctz072 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.aam874310.1126/science.aam8743 ↗
35. 10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033<1313:APSFCF>2.0.CO;210.1175/1520-0450(1994)033<1313:APSFCF>2.0.CO;2 ↗
36. 10.1007/s13280-012-0247-810.1007/s13280-012-0247-8 ↗
37. Drupps Electric · 2020
38. Drupps Electric · 2020
39. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.04610.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.046 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.04.00710.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.04.007 ↗
41. 10.1007/s40899-015-0038-z10.1007/s40899-015-0038-z ↗
42. International Organization for Dew Utilization
43. 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.00210.1016/j.energy.2015.06.002 ↗
44. 10.1115/1.404138110.1115/1.4041381 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.11110.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.111 ↗
46. NREL · 2018
47. FuelCellsWorks · 2020
48. James B. D. · 2013
49. James B. · 201310.2172/1214980 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.mset.2019.03.00210.1016/j.mset.2019.03.002 ↗
51. 10.1016/B978-0-444-62746-9.00011-610.1016/B978-0-444-62746-9.00011-6 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.513883210.1063/1.5138832 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.09910.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.099 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0092010.1021/acsenergylett.8b00920 ↗
55. Woodhouse M. · 2020
56. 10.1016/j.solener.2003.12.01210.1016/j.solener.2003.12.012 ↗
57. Mcdaniel A. · 201710.2172/1379457 ↗
58. Peterson D. · 2016
59. Business Portal Norwegen · 2017
60. Amos W. A. · 1998
61. Electrochaea · 2018
62. 10.1038/nrmicro193110.1038/nrmicro1931 ↗
63. Electrochaea · 2017
64. 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.04410.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.044 ↗
65. 2014
66. 10.1126/science.aav350610.1126/science.aav3506 ↗
67. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0070510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 ↗
68. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0057110.1021/acscatal.7b00571 ↗
69. 10.1126/science.aay421710.1126/science.aay4217 ↗
70. 10.1126/science.aav350610.1126/science.aav3506 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.05110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.051 ↗
72. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0257610.1021/acsenergylett.9b02576 ↗
73. Spath P. · 200510.2172/15016221 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.00410.1016/j.rser.2017.08.004 ↗
75. 10.1155/2013/15752910.1155/2013/157529 ↗
76. US Energy Information Administration · 2020
77. 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.04.00610.1016/j.seppur.2005.04.006 ↗