journal article·2021-11-12Open access

Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries

Min Li, Susan A. Odom, Adam R. Pancoast, Lily A. Robertson, Thomas P. Vaid, Garvit Agarwal, Hieu A. Doan, Yilin Wang, T. Malsha Suduwella, Sambasiva R. Bheemireddy, Randy H. Ewoldt, Rajeev S. Assary, Lu Zhang, Matthew S. Sigman, Shelley D. Minteer

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 6· Issue 11

Abstract

We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been implemented commercially. Nevertheless, the limited energy densities and high-cost materials may preclude their wider market penetration. Organic non-aqueous redox-flow batteries (O-NRFBs), which utilize redox-active organic molecules (ROMs), have been offered as an attractive alternative. Many possible advantages include the use of earth-abundant elements (C, H, N, O, S, F), wherein the ROMs can be prepared from low-cost and sustainable materials. Additionally, a large variety of electroactive moieties are accessible as building blocks, providing a synthetic platform to tune the properties of ROMs through rational design. As a consequence, the development of novel ROMs has attracted researchers with diverse backgrounds, prompting remarkable innovations in the past decade. However, consistency in experimental protocols (e.g., electrochemical methods, cycling stability, experimental conditions) has not coincided with this uptick in research, leading to sometimes ambiguous and incomparable results. This is further convoluted by the complexity innate to battery development, such as cell design, detection, and characterization of reactions and active components. The O-NRFB application imposes stringent requirements on the physical or/and chemical processes involved in electrochemical cycling. Yet such considerations are often overlooked. Further, while quantum mechanical calculations provide a convenient tool for evaluating and selecting ROM candidates, this simulation is not always performed. Thus, in this Energy Focus, we detail a means to standardize experimental protocols for studies of O-NRFBs and suggest practices to facilitate fundamental understanding and development of ROMs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States

Joint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States

Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, United States

Joint Center for Energy Storage Research and Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States

Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States

Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States

Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana−Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences

References (78)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.182167211710.1073/pnas.1821672117 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.01010.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.010 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0133210.1021/acsenergylett.9b01332 ↗
4. 10.1039/D0SE00800A10.1039/D0SE00800A ↗
5. 10.1002/celc.20200158410.1002/celc.202001584 ↗
6. 10.1039/C7CS00569E10.1039/C7CS00569E ↗
7. 10.1038/nature1290910.1038/nature12909 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0076810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00768 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c0119710.1021/acs.jpcb.0c01197 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c0764710.1021/acs.jpcb.0c07647 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0086410.1021/acsapm.9b00864 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6TA01177B10.1039/C6TA01177B ↗
13. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0025510.1021/acsenergylett.6b00255 ↗
14. 10.1021/jacs.9b0734510.1021/jacs.9b07345 ↗
15. 10.1039/C8TA01059E10.1039/C8TA01059E ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0413110.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04131 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0057410.1021/acs.macromol.8b00574 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.0c0746410.1021/jacs.0c07464 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c0776010.1021/acs.jpcb.0c07760 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-020-17662-y10.1038/s41467-020-17662-y ↗
21. 10.1039/D0SE00687D10.1039/D0SE00687D ↗
22. 10.1039/C4CP01572J10.1039/C4CP01572J ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0759110.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07591 ↗
24. 10.1021/jo300853k10.1021/jo300853k ↗
25. 10.1021/jz502319n10.1021/jz502319n ↗
26. 10.1039/C7TA01285C10.1039/C7TA01285C ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0828110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08281 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.489448110.1063/1.4894481 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1147310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11473 ↗
30. 10.1039/D0TA02214D10.1039/D0TA02214D ↗
31. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.10210.1038/nenergy.2016.102 ↗
32. 10.1021/ar50097a00310.1021/ar50097a003 ↗
33. 10.1002/celc.20160026610.1002/celc.201600266 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b0036110.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00361 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0128110.1021/acsnano.0c01281 ↗
36. Bard A. J. · Electrochem. Methods · 2001 · 2 · 580
37. 10.1021/ac60230a01610.1021/ac60230a016 ↗
38. 10.1002/1521-4109(200202)14:3<165::AID-ELAN165>3.0.CO;2-610.1002/1521-4109(200202)14:3<165::AID-ELAN165>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
39. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b0054410.1021/acscentsci.7b00544 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0282510.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02825 ↗
41. 10.1021/ja508482e10.1021/ja508482e ↗
42. 10.1021/acscentsci.8b0009910.1021/acscentsci.8b00099 ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20161058210.1002/anie.201610582 ↗
44. 10.1039/D0TA02303E10.1039/D0TA02303E ↗
45. 10.3390/membranes702002910.3390/membranes7020029 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.08710.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.087 ↗
47. 10.1149/2.004201esl10.1149/2.004201esl ↗
48. 10.1149/1945-7111/aba33810.1149/1945-7111/aba338 ↗
49. 10.1149/2.0161807jes10.1149/2.0161807jes ↗
50. 10.1016/j.elecom.2019.10662510.1016/j.elecom.2019.106625 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0059910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00599 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0014010.1021/acsenergylett.0c00140 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41560-020-00772-810.1038/s41560-020-00772-8 ↗
54. 10.1063/5.001016810.1063/5.0010168 ↗
55. 10.1021/jacs.7b0835310.1021/jacs.7b08353 ↗
56. 10.1039/D0MA00881H10.1039/D0MA00881H ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0200910.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02009 ↗
58. Macosko C. W. · 1994
60. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b0824510.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08245 ↗
61. Ewoldt R. H. · 2015 · 20710.1007/978-1-4939-2065-5_6 ↗
62. 10.1039/C6EE02027E10.1039/C6EE02027E ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0477010.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04770 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.001 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22728310.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227283 ↗
66. 10.1002/cphc.20140267410.1002/cphc.201402674 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.05710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.057 ↗
68. 10.1149/2.0891807jes10.1149/2.0891807jes ↗
69. 10.1149/2.0971602jes10.1149/2.0971602jes ↗
70. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0026110.1021/acsenergylett.7b00261 ↗
71. 10.1002/smtd.20190069710.1002/smtd.201900697 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.02310.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.023 ↗
73. 10.1002/chem.20200074910.1002/chem.202000749 ↗
74. 10.1039/C9CC06080D10.1039/C9CC06080D ↗
75. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b0062110.1021/acs.analchem.8b00621 ↗
76. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0144710.1021/acsenergylett.0c01447 ↗
77. 10.1038/s41586-020-2081-710.1038/s41586-020-2081-7 ↗
78. 10.1021/jacs.0c1065010.1021/jacs.0c10650 ↗