journal article·2026-06-12Open access

Structure–Transport Relationships in Microarchitected LiFePO 4 –Carbon Li Ion Battery Electrodes

Yingjin Wang, Yuchun Sun, Julia R. Greer

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 11· Issue 6

Abstract

The interconnected pore structure and large surface-to-volume ratio of three-dimensional (3D) architected battery electrodes enable enhanced electrochemical performance through improved ionic transport. We developed a hydrogel infusion additive manufacturing (HIAM)-based approach to fabricate microarchitected LiFePO4 (LFP)/C composite electrodes with feature dimensions of 18 μm, delivering a specific capacity of 160 mAh/g at C/10. Electrodes with tilted cube, honeycomb, and triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) geometries were designed to probe geometric effects on electrochemical performance under various rates. Material characterization revealed homogeneous formation of LFP particles (201 ± 67 nm) within the lattices, while the concomitantly formed carbon network provided mechanical support and enabled high-fidelity architecture. An experimentally informed electrochemical model identified electrolyte Li+ transport and solid-state Li+ diffusion as the dominant factors governing active material utilization. This work introduces a versatile manufacturing platform for 3D battery components and provides insights into structure optimization for high-performance rechargeable batteries.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Engineering and Applied Science

California Institute of Technology

Kavli Nanoscience Institute

Funding

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0222910.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02229 ↗
2. 10.1007/s40820-023-01183-610.1007/s40820-023-01183-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.04.03010.1016/j.ensm.2021.04.030 ↗
4. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.9910.1038/nenergy.2016.99 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0012310.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00123 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms555410.1038/ncomms5554 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20180239810.1002/aenm.201802398 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.10310710.1016/j.ensm.2023.103107 ↗
9. 10.4236/aces.2016.6201710.4236/aces.2016.62017 ↗
10. 10.1063/5.015194910.1063/5.0151949 ↗
11. 10.1126/sciadv.160242710.1126/sciadv.1602427 ↗
12. 10.1039/D1EE01739J10.1039/D1EE01739J ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20200622910.1002/adma.202006229 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41578-018-0069-910.1038/s41578-018-0069-9 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20170713210.1002/adma.201707132 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0245710.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02457 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16082410.1016/j.cej.2025.160824 ↗
18. 10.1002/cey2.11410.1002/cey2.114 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20250094610.1002/adfm.202500946 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20130103610.1002/adma.201301036 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20170302710.1002/adma.201703027 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.01.38910.1016/j.ceramint.2024.01.389 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20200728510.1002/adfm.202007285 ↗
24. 10.1002/smll.20230160410.1002/smll.202301604 ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20230170410.1002/aenm.202301704 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.8b1479710.1021/acsami.8b14797 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22859310.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228593 ↗
28. 10.1557/s43578-021-00182-w10.1557/s43578-021-00182-w ↗
29. 10.1002/admt.20200079110.1002/admt.202000791 ↗
30. 10.1002/advs.20251331210.1002/advs.202513312 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41586-022-05433-210.1038/s41586-022-05433-2 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.7b1237610.1021/acsami.7b12376 ↗
33. 10.1149/1.183757110.1149/1.1837571 ↗
34. 10.1002/smtd.20220134410.1002/smtd.202201344 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13774310.1016/j.electacta.2021.137743 ↗
36. 10.1002/smll.20220227710.1002/smll.202202277 ↗
37. 10.1149/1.222159710.1149/1.2221597 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.16110.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.161 ↗
39. 10.1002/adfm.20240923010.1002/adfm.202409230 ↗