Morphological Stability of Metal Anodes: Roles of Solid Electrolyte Interphases (SEIs) and Desolvation Kinetics
Source abstract
Abstract
Achieving stable lithium metal anodes requires control over the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) and desolvation kinetics. Here, we develop a unified theoretical framework integrating ion transport, desolvation, charge transfer, and SEI breakdown to predict morphological instabilities during electrodeposition. Using linear stability analysis, we identify six dimensionless parameters that govern the onset and evolution of instabilities. We show that SEI transport and desolvation rate effectively modulate apparent reaction kinetics, shifting the system toward a stable, reaction-limited regime. Extending the classical limiting current concept, we demonstrate that a thick, poorly conductive SEI and sluggish desolvation significantly reduce the limiting current. We introduce an apparent Damköhler number to quantify the critical balance: suppressing diffusion-limited instabilities by reaction rate reduction, while maintaining a high limiting current. Our theory enables predictive mapping of electrodeposition morphologies across diverse materials and operating conditions, guiding the rational design of stable lithium metal anodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Northwestern University
Funding
Office of Naval Research · Center for Hierarchical Materials Design
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41560-021-00910-w10.1038/s41560-021-00910-w ↗
2. 10.1021/cr030203g10.1021/cr030203g ↗
3. 10.1038/s41578-019-0103-610.1038/s41578-019-0103-6 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41560-025-01767-z10.1038/s41560-025-01767-z ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aam601410.1126/science.aam6014 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.00410.1016/j.joule.2018.08.004 ↗
7. 10.1126/sciadv.adv319110.1126/sciadv.adv3191 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0279210.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02792 ↗
9. 10.1073/pnas.242555612210.1073/pnas.2425556122 ↗
10. 10.1021/jacs.1c0386810.1021/jacs.1c03868 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0499110.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04991 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.5c0101910.1021/acsenergylett.5c01019 ↗
13. 10.1039/D2EE04203G10.1039/D2EE04203G ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.01130110.1103/PhysRevE.92.011301 ↗
15. 10.1557/mrc.2017.3810.1557/mrc.2017.38 ↗
16. 10.1149/2.1521910jes10.1149/2.1521910jes ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.abe021910.1126/sciadv.abe0219 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.10236010.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102360 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20200037510.1002/anie.202000375 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20230189910.1002/aenm.202301899 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.12.02210.1016/j.joule.2023.12.022 ↗
22. Newman J. · 2021
23. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0003110.1021/acsenergylett.0c00031 ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.2c0818210.1021/jacs.2c08182 ↗
25. 10.1137/04060993810.1137/040609938 ↗
26. Sekerka, R. F.; Coriell, S. R.; McFadden, G. B. Handbook of Crystal Growth ; Elsevier, 2015; pp 595–630.10.1016/B978-0-444-56369-9.00014-9 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2024.10407310.1016/j.ijengsci.2024.104073 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41586-025-09675-810.1038/s41586-025-09675-8 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41560-024-01494-x10.1038/s41560-024-01494-x ↗
30. 10.1149/1945-7111/ad0ff610.1149/1945-7111/ad0ff6 ↗