journal article·2026-03-13

Architecting the Third Dimension of Electrochemical Energy Storage

Xinzhe Xue, Swetha Chandrasekaran, Cheng Zhu, Marcus A. Worsley, Yat Li

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 11· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) architectural design has emerged as a powerful strategy to push electrochemical energy storage (EES) devices beyond the intrinsic limitations of conventional two-dimensional (2D) electrodes. While planar architectures enable high packing density and mature manufacturing, they suffer from limited ion transport and low active-material loading. In contrast, 3D architectures introduce low-tortuosity networks and high surface area that enhance charge and mass transport while supporting thick, high mass-loading electrodes. However, their practicality remains hindered by challenges in volumetric density, mechanical stability, and large-scale manufacturability. This Perspective examines the key evaluation and design principles that govern 3D device performance. We discuss the fundamental trade-offs between porosity, volumetric density, and mechanical stability that shape 3D design and highlight emerging strategies for integrating materials engineering, structural optimization, device integration, computational modeling, and scalable manufacturing. By aligning structural functionality with manufacturability, 3D architectures can evolve from laboratory prototypes to commercially viable energy storage systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California 95064, United States of America

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, California 94550, United States of America

Funding

Laboratory Directed Research and Development · University of California, Santa Cruz

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41578-019-0142-z10.1038/s41578-019-0142-z ↗
2. 10.1038/s41586-022-05627-810.1038/s41586-022-05627-8 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41578-018-0069-910.1038/s41578-018-0069-9 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20190145710.1002/aenm.201901457 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20180366510.1002/aenm.201803665 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0053310.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00533 ↗
7. 10.1007/s12274-016-1173-z10.1007/s12274-016-1173-z ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20210875010.1002/adma.202108750 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20190665210.1002/adma.201906652 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20220996310.1002/adma.202209963 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.03.02110.1016/j.joule.2023.03.021 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.02010.1016/j.joule.2018.09.020 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-019-0398-y10.1038/s41560-019-0398-y ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20170343810.1002/aenm.201703438 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.03810.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.038 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.01210.1016/j.joule.2018.12.012 ↗
17. 10.1021/am502593510.1021/am5025935 ↗
18. 10.1007/s40820-024-01472-810.1007/s40820-024-01472-8 ↗
19. 10.1002/sstr.20227003610.1002/sstr.202270036 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0478010.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04780 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0649110.1021/acsnano.1c06491 ↗
22. 10.1002/celc.20180143610.1002/celc.201801436 ↗
23. 10.1088/2516-1083/ad8abd10.1088/2516-1083/ad8abd ↗
24. 10.1002/ente.20240024410.1002/ente.202400244 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23045310.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230453 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598-024-71765-w10.1038/s41598-024-71765-w ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c0443510.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c04435 ↗
28. 10.1002/9783527631704.ch0510.1002/9783527631704.ch05 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.02610.1016/j.cej.2017.11.026 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.susoc.2021.09.00410.1016/j.susoc.2021.09.004 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0040510.1021/acsenergylett.7b00405 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-025-67032-910.1038/s41467-025-67032-9 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20241950510.1002/adma.202419505 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0210010.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02100 ↗
35. 10.1021/jacs.5c0350710.1021/jacs.5c03507 ↗
36. 10.1002/anie.20241822310.1002/anie.202418223 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20241548010.1002/adfm.202415480 ↗
38. 10.1039/D4EE05110F10.1039/D4EE05110F ↗
39. 10.1002/aenm.20230040810.1002/aenm.202300408 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.06.01910.1016/j.ensm.2019.06.019 ↗
41. 10.1002/adfm.20190886810.1002/adfm.201908868 ↗
42. 10.1002/smll.20190352010.1002/smll.201903520 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41467-019-09932-110.1038/s41467-019-09932-1 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0161910.1021/acsenergylett.0c01619 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0054110.1021/acs.accounts.6b00541 ↗
46. 10.1039/C4CS00232F10.1039/C4CS00232F ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5c0187310.1021/acs.chemmater.5c01873 ↗
48. 10.1021/jacsau.4c0055510.1021/jacsau.4c00555 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10883410.1016/j.matdes.2020.108834 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0481110.1021/acs.iecr.0c04811 ↗
51. Nigel Battery Pack Density Fundamental Limit https://www.batterydesign.net/battery-pack-density-fundamental-limit/ (accessed Dec 18, 2025).
52. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.04110.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.041 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsami.2c1195410.1021/acsami.2c11954 ↗
54. 10.1002/aenm.20160085610.1002/aenm.201600856 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0135410.1021/acsenergylett.3c01354 ↗
56. 10.1007/s40820-021-00731-210.1007/s40820-021-00731-2 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsami.5c0709410.1021/acsami.5c07094 ↗
58. 10.1038/s41467-020-19411-710.1038/s41467-020-19411-7 ↗
59. 10.1126/sciadv.aao720210.1126/sciadv.aao7202 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0052810.1021/acsenergylett.3c00528 ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0032110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00321 ↗
62. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0010110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.05810.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.058 ↗
64. 10.1038/s44334-025-00045-w10.1038/s44334-025-00045-w ↗
65. 10.1002/adma.20231420410.1002/adma.202314204 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.est.2022.10614010.1016/j.est.2022.106140 ↗
67. Knehr K. W. · 202210.2172/1877590 ↗