Consequential Climate and Energy Analysis of Steel Electrification via Hydrogen Direct Reduction
Source abstract
Abstract
Amid global goals for industrial decarbonization, electrolytic hydrogen direct reduction of iron ore paired with electric arc furnaces offers a low-carbon alternative to blast furnace steelmaking, but imposes a substantial load on the electricity grid. Here, we utilize an ensemble framework to understand how proton exchange membrane electrolyzers and steel production facility energy demands impact grid load and capacity expansion. We discern considerable electricity demand for electrolysis, with plant operating conditions translating to significant differences in the electricity sources and emissions. For Indiana, the largest steel producer in the US, we observe up to a 71% drop in total cumulative emissions by 2050 under scenarios rich in both solar and wind electricity generation resources. Wind resources are instrumental in achieving these emission reductions compared to other low-carbon generation technologies. Insights from this framework serve as guidelines for developing cooptimized electrolyzer and grid integration strategies and are applicable to other industries incorporating hydrogen-based decarbonization technologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron and Steelmaking Processes · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering
Purdue University
School of Sustainability Engineering and Environmental Engineering
Funding
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. U.S. Department of Energy. Industrial Decarbonization Roadmap. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Industrial%20Decarbonization%20Roadmap.pdf (accessed 2025–04–17).
2. 10.1126/science.aas979310.1126/science.aas9793 ↗
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. GHGRP Metals. https://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/ghgrp-metals (accessed 2025–04–17).
4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA Facility Level Information on GreenHouse gases Tool (FLIGHT). https://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do?site_preference=normal (accessed 2025–02–14).
5. 10.1016/j.ces.2024.12063710.1016/j.ces.2024.120637 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.27910.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.279 ↗
7. 10.3390/met1007097210.3390/met10070972 ↗
8. U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2025. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2025/mcs2025-iron-steel.pdf (accessed 2025–08–19).
9. Phillips, T. A.; Velástegui, M. A.; Gotham, D. J.; Kain, A. E.; Lu, L.; Nderitu, D. G.; Fate, C. Indiana Electricity Projections: The 2023 Forecast. https://www.purdue.edu/discoverypark/sufg/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2023-SUFG-forecast.pdf (accessed 2025–08–19).
10. 10.1016/j.egycc.2024.10015210.1016/j.egycc.2024.100152 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.02.01810.1016/j.joule.2021.02.018 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-023-38123-210.1038/s41467-023-38123-2 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.est.4c0575610.1021/acs.est.4c05756 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12118410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121184 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.10073810.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100738 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23265410.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232654 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.3c1234510.1021/acsami.3c12345 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23091510.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230915 ↗
19. 10.1002/er.837510.1002/er.8375 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.11908910.1016/j.enconman.2024.119089 ↗
21. 10.1039/D4TA08669D10.1039/D4TA08669D ↗
22. Ho, J.; Becker, J.; Brown, M.; Brown, P.; Chernyakhovskiy, I.; Cohen, S.; Cole, W.; Corcoran, S.; Eurek, K.; Frazier, W.; Gagnon, P.; Gates, N.; Greer, D.; Jadun, P.; Khanal, S.; Machen, S.; Macmillan, M.; Mai, T.; Mowers, M.; Murphy, C.; Rose, A.; Schleifer, A.; Sergi, B.; Steinberg, D.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, E. Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) Model Documentation: Version 2020. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/78195.pdf (accessed 2025–08–11).
23. 10.1007/s11367-015-1026-010.1007/s11367-015-1026-0 ↗
24. Global Energy Monitor. Global Iron and Steel Tracker. https://globalenergymonitor.org/projects/global-iron-and-steel-tracker/ (accessed 2025–03–31).
25. Monroe, R.; Warner, T. J.; Allemon, B.; Lewis, C. B.; Bes, G.; Warren, J.; Gong, J.; Kuehmann, C. The Rise of the US Steel Industry Current Challenges and Opportunities for the Aluminum Transformation Industry in the United States The Materials Genome Initiative and the Metals Industry Harnessing the Power of AI in Materials Digital Transformation: A Synergistic Hybrid Approach Concurrent Design of Materials and Systems Spring 2024 BRIDGE THE US METALS INDUSTRY: LOOKING FORWARD. www.nae.edu/TheBridge (accessed 2025–08–11).
26. Thomton, M.; Mon, H. M.; Boba, C.; Juárez, A. Decarbonising global iron ore and steel industry by 2050 necessitates urgent action and US$1.4 trillion of investment. https://www.woodmac.com/press-releases/decarbonising-global-iron-ore-and-steel-industry-by-2050-necessitates-urgent-action-and-us$1.4-trillion-of-investment/ (accessed 2025–06–23).
27. U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2024. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024-iron-steel-scrap.pdf (accessed 2025–08–11).
28. 10.1039/D3EE01077E10.1039/D3EE01077E ↗
29. HYBRIT: New research shows hydrogen-reduced iron has superior properties. https://www.hybritdevelopment.se/en/hybrit-new-research-shows-hydrogen-reduced-iron-has-superior-properties/ (accessed 2025–08–11).
30. 10.2355/isijinternational1966.28.65010.2355/isijinternational1966.28.650 ↗
31. FRC Global. The Costs Of Producing Steel With Electric Arc Furnaces. https://www.frcglobal.com/blog/the-costs-of-producing-steel-with-electric-arc-furnaces (accessed 2025–02–14).
32. 10.1016/j.jprocont.2018.03.00210.1016/j.jprocont.2018.03.002 ↗
33. Fruehan, R. J.; Fortini, O.; Paxton, H. W.; Brindle, R. Theoretical Minimum Energies To Produce Steel for Selected Conditions. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/769470-UrGmaW/webviewable/ (accessed 2025–08–11).
34. 10.3390/su15171304710.3390/su151713047 ↗
35. 10.1039/C7SE00498B10.1039/C7SE00498B ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.08910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.089 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10325110.1016/j.ensm.2024.103251 ↗
38. Technical Targets for Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/technical-targets-proton-exchange-membrane-electrolysis (accessed 2025–08–11).
39. HyLYZER-400 HyLYZER-500. https://mart.cummins.com/imagelibrary/data/assetfiles/0070330.pdf (accessed 2025–08–11).
40. 10.1126/sciadv.adh288510.1126/sciadv.adh2885 ↗
41. U.S. Department of Energy. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office Multi-Year Program Plan. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/hfto-mypp-2024.pdf (accessed 2025–08–11).
42. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11591110.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115911 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.11110.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.111 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14093310.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140933 ↗
45. 10.1002/srin.20190003410.1002/srin.201900034 ↗
46. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Electricity Data Browser. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/PDF/R46820/R46820.3.pdf (accessed 2025–08–11).
47. 10.1007/s11367-021-01954-610.1007/s11367-021-01954-6 ↗
48. 10.1002/srin.20210008310.1002/srin.202100083 ↗
49. 10.1073/pnas.230231312010.1073/pnas.2302313120 ↗
50. Schubert, P. J. The Good Questions Project: Understanding Energy Project Development in Indiana. https://www.in.gov/oed/files/Good-Questions-Project-Phase-1-Final-Report-IUPUI.pdf (accessed 2025–08–11).