Reduced Flow Battery Capacity Fade from Mixed Redox-Active Organics Beyond the Rule of Mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
Aqueous organic redox flow batteries offer a sustainable approach to long-duration energy storage but suffer from molecular degradation. Here, we present a mixed redox-active strategy that stabilizes 2,6-dihydroxyanthraquinone (DHAQ) by enabling in situ regeneration of redox-active species under standard operating conditions. By incorporating 0.1 M of 4,4′-((9,10-anthraquinone-2,6-diyl)dioxy)dibutyrate (DBEAQ) into a 0.1 M DHAQ electrolyte, the fade rate is reduced from 4.7% to 0.9% per day, a 62% decrease relative to the 2.35%/day expected from a noninteracting mixture. Increasing DBEAQ concentration to 0.2 M further lowers fade to 0.43% per day, representing a 73% reduction relative to the expected value of 1.57%. Electrochemical and NMR data show that regeneration occurs via chemical oxidation of anthrone to a dimer, followed by electrochemical reoxidation to DHAQ. This approach is not limited to DBEAQ, suggesting broad applicability to other anthraquinones. The underlying regeneration mechanism offers a general framework for improving electrolyte stability in organic redox flow batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Department of Materials Engineering
The University of British Columbia
Funding
Office of Science · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/aenm.20150144910.1002/aenm.201501449 ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.20171051710.1002/anie.201710517 ↗
3. 10.1039/C8CC02336K10.1039/C8CC02336K ↗
4. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.01910.1016/j.joule.2021.06.019 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0077310.1021/acsenergylett.4c00773 ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20240072110.1002/aenm.202400721 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-022-32424-810.1038/s41467-022-32424-8 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-023-42450-910.1038/s41467-023-42450-9 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0133210.1021/acsenergylett.9b01332 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22996510.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229965 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.00910.1016/j.joule.2019.11.009 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20221133810.1002/adfm.202211338 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.coche.2022.10085510.1016/j.coche.2022.100855 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0014010.1021/acsenergylett.0c00140 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0059910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00599 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.aab303310.1126/science.aab3033 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cocis.2022.10162410.1016/j.cocis.2022.101624 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.8b1329510.1021/jacs.8b13295 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41586-020-2081-710.1038/s41586-020-2081-7 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41557-022-00967-410.1038/s41557-022-00967-4 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.4c0607310.1021/acsami.4c06073 ↗
22. 10.1149/1945-7111/ad129510.1149/1945-7111/ad1295 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.0c1065010.1021/jacs.0c10650 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.00510.1016/j.joule.2018.07.005 ↗
25. 10.1002/batt.20220000910.1002/batt.202200009 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20190003910.1002/aenm.201900039 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0169110.1021/acsenergylett.2c01691 ↗