Metal–Hydrogen Batteries and Decoupled Electrolyzers: Converging Pathways for Hydrogen-Integrated Energy Storage
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Electrochemical energy storage and hydrogen conversion have historically been developed as separate technologies, yet their chemistries and engineering challenges overlap profoundly. Metal–hydrogen (M–H 2 ) batteries and redox-mediated, membrane-free electrolyzers both rely on reversible hydrogen redox chemistry in aqueous or hybrid electrolytes. This Perspective examines how these systems, once considered distinct, are converging at the level of redox chemistry, materials challenges, and benchmarking needs while retaining distinct architectures and engineering constraints for dispatchable, long-duration energy storage. It summarizes benchmark metrics for each platform, identifies shared scientific foundations, and outlines design principles for mediators, electrodes, and interfaces. Emphasis is placed on best practices for standardized testing and reporting, cross-disciplinary benchmarking, and near-term research directions. By viewing M–H 2 batteries and decoupled electrolyzers as complementary elements rather than competitors, it becomes possible to envision a cohesive hydrogen-integrated energy infrastructure spanning seconds-to-seasons storage.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC energiGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Alava Technology Park, Albert Einstein 48, 01510 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, María Díaz de Haro 3, 48013 Bilbao, Spain
Funding
Agencia Estatal de Investigaci?n · European Regional Development Fund · Eusko Jaurlaritza · European Social Fund Plus
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Headley A. J. · 2022
2. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10510910.1016/j.rineng.2025.105109 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41560-024-01684-710.1038/s41560-024-01684-7 ↗
4. 10.1038/451652a10.1038/451652a ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.23479710.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234797 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20241966310.1002/anie.202419663 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.10085910.1016/j.coelec.2021.100859 ↗
8. Enervenue. Energy Storage Vessel . https://enervenue.com/energy-storage-vessel (accessed 2026-02-10).
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22958510.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229585 ↗
10. 10.3390/catal1503026010.3390/catal15030260 ↗
11. Fritts, D. H. Low Pressure Nickel Hydrogen Battery. U.S. Pat. US4395469A, July 1983.
12. 10.2514/3.6256910.2514/3.62569 ↗
13. Adler, E.; Perez, F. Advanced Nickel Hydrogen Cell Configuration Study ; The 1982 Goddard Space Flight Center Battery Workshop, Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA, 1983.
14. 10.1038/s41560-018-0147-710.1038/s41560-018-0147-7 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0004410.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00044 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.10045310.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100453 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-021-24284-510.1038/s41467-021-24284-5 ↗
18. 10.1038/ncomms1174110.1038/ncomms11741 ↗
19. 10.1039/C7SC05388F10.1039/C7SC05388F ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.0c0951010.1021/jacs.0c09510 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0023610.1021/acsenergylett.1c00236 ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat487610.1038/nmat4876 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.12.00610.1016/j.joule.2019.12.006 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.04.06010.1016/j.ces.2016.04.060 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.08710.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.087 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacsau.4c0071010.1021/jacsau.4c00710 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c0090410.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00904 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.11110.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.111 ↗
29. 10.1073/pnas.180934411510.1073/pnas.1809344115 ↗
30. 10.1002/fuce.20230020910.1002/fuce.202300209 ↗
31. 10.1002/advs.20241448010.1002/advs.202414480 ↗
32. 10.1021/jacs.3c1480710.1021/jacs.3c14807 ↗
33. 10.1039/D2MA01003H10.1039/D2MA01003H ↗
34. 10.1002/celc.20220100310.1002/celc.202201003 ↗
35. 10.4271/92946010.4271/929460 ↗
36. 10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-210.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-2 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00890-410.1016/S0378-7753(01)00890-4 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41560-019-0462-710.1038/s41560-019-0462-7 ↗
39. 10.3917/rindu1.224.014310.3917/rindu1.224.0143 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41560-019-0465-410.1038/s41560-019-0465-4 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c0074510.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c00745 ↗
42. 10.1002/smll.20240220010.1002/smll.202402200 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.12971010.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.129710 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.10639810.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106398 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0883110.1021/acsnano.3c08831 ↗
46. 10.1002/advs.20230028310.1002/advs.202300283 ↗
47. 10.1039/D2SE01517J10.1039/D2SE01517J ↗
48. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.06910.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.069 ↗
49. Patel, P. Grid-Scale Battery Storage: Nickel-Hydrogen. IEEE Spectrum , 2023. https://spectrum.ieee.org/grid-scale-battery-storage-nickel-hydrogen (accessed 2026-02-10).
50. Steward, D.; Saur, G.; Penev, M.; Ramsden, T. Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Hydrogen Versus Other Technologies for Electrical Energy Storage , Technical Report NREL/TP-560-46719; National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2009. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1218397 (accessed 2026-02-10).10.2172/968186 ↗
51. Ramsden, T.; Steward, D.; Zuboy, J. Analyzing the Levelized Cost of Centralized and Distributed Hydrogen Production Using the H2A Production Model, Version 2 , Technical Report NREL/TP-560-46267; National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2009. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/965528 (accessed 2026-02-10).10.2172/965528 ↗
52. Lichner, C. Electrolyzer Prices─What to Expect. PV Magazine . 2024. https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/03/21/electrolyzer-prices-what-to-expect/ (accessed 2026-02-10).
53. Badgett, A.; Brauch, J.; Thatte, A.; Rubin, R.; Skangos, C.; Wang, X.; Ahluwalia, R.; Pivovar, B.; Ruth, M. Updated Manufactured Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers , Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-87625; National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2024. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy24osti/87625.pdf (accessed 2026-02-10).
54. 10.1039/D0CS01079K10.1039/D0CS01079K ↗
55. Viswanathan, V.; Mongird, K.; Franks, R.; Li, X.; Sprenkle, V.; Baxter, R. 2022 Grid Energy Storage Technology Cost and Performance Assessment , Technical Report PNNL-33283; U.S. Department of Energy, 2022.
56. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.01810.1016/j.joule.2021.06.018 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.16310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.163 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.07310.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.073 ↗