Data-driven optimization of the in silico design of ionic liquids as interfacial cell culture fluids
Source abstract
Abstract
As an alternative to conventional plastic dishes, the interface between water-immiscible hydrophobic fluids, such as perfluorocarbons and silicones, permits cell adhesion and growth. Thus, it is expected to replace the petroleum-derived products in a sustainable society. However, most hydrophobic fluids are cytotoxic, which limits the range of mechanical and chemical cues exposed to the cells. Using a data-driven approach, this study aimed to identify non-cytotoxic ionic liquids (ILs) as fluid culture platforms to take advantage of their ‘designer’ nature for broadening the possible physicochemical ranges exposed to cells and their repeated use owing to their high heat stability before their biological applications. The new candidates within the readily synthesize ammonium-type ILs were identified through the active cycle of regression and a limited number of cytotoxicity tests. Structure – cytotoxicity analysis indicated that the presence of multiple long alkyl branches was critical for low cytotoxicity. Particularly, we successfully cultured human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) at the trihexylethylammonium trifluoromethylsulfonylimide interface and repeated their use after solvent extraction and heat sterilization. This study identified non-cytotoxic ILs that fulfill plastics’ 3 R (Reduce, Recycle, and Replace) requirements and opens new avenues for hMSC fate manipulation through mechanotransduction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Ionic liquids properties and applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS)
Waseda University
Tokyo University of Science
Hokkaido University
NIMS
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/en1601025310.3390/en16010253 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.08410.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.084 ↗
3. Kunitin D. How to… reduce your lab’s plastic waste. Biologist. 2018;65(6):28–31.
4. 10.1038/s41578-021-00407-810.1038/s41578-021-00407-8 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10529-019-02738-710.1007/s10529-019-02738-7 ↗
6. 10.1002/rmb2.1202410.1002/rmb2.12024 ↗
7. Rosenberg MD. Cell surface interaction and interfacial dynamics. In: Emmelot P Mohbock O, editors. Cellular control mechanisms and cancer. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1964. p. 146–164.
8. 10.1073/pnas.80.1.21910.1073/pnas.80.1.219 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0533910.1021/acs.nanolett.7b05339 ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20180464010.1002/smll.201804640 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-022-30622-y10.1038/s41467-022-30622-y ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20240339610.1002/adma.202403396 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.682887210.1126/science.6828872 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.10015910.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100159 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00424-020-02482-210.1007/s00424-020-02482-2 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.12912010.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129120 ↗
17. 10.5194/acp-20-4787-202010.5194/acp-20-4787-2020 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20231010510.1002/adma.202310105 ↗
19. 10.1021/cr400374x10.1021/cr400374x ↗
20. 10.1039/B006677J10.1039/B006677J ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20190594210.1002/adma.201905942 ↗
22. 10.1002/adhm.20230066610.1002/adhm.202300666 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41536-019-0083-610.1038/s41536-019-0083-6 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-981-10-7617-6_410.1007/978-981-10-7617-6_4 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12142910.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121429 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.14730910.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147309 ↗
27. 10.1371/journal.pone.005914510.1371/journal.pone.0059145 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.10310.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.103 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp506095210.1021/jp5060952 ↗
30. 10.1039/C8RA06384B10.1039/C8RA06384B ↗
31. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.17123810.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171238 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.09710.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.097 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.03.01010.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.03.010 ↗
34. 10.1039/C5GC01472G10.1039/C5GC01472G ↗
35. 10.1063/1.220495910.1063/1.2204959 ↗
36. 10.1021/je700171f10.1021/je700171f ↗
37. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, et al. Gaussian 16 Rev. A.03. Wallingford (CT): Gaussian Inc; 2016.
38. 10.1063/1.46491310.1063/1.464913 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.45615310.1063/1.456153 ↗
40. PyCaret version 1.0.0: PyCaret. 2020. Available from: https://pycaret.org/
41. 10.1214/aos/101320345110.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
42. Scikit-optimize. Available from: https://scikit-optimize.github.io/stable/
43. 10.1214/ss/100921240910.1214/ss/1009212409 ↗