Mechanism of antibacterial property of micro scale rough surface formed by fine-particle bombarding
Source abstract
Abstract
Fine-particle bombardment (FPB) is typically used to modify metal surfaces by bombarding them with fine particles at high speed. FPB is not a coating technique but is used for forming microscale concavities and convexities on a surface. Previously, we reported that an FPB-treated surface showed antibacterial effects; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesized that the pitch size of concavity and convexity, and irregular microscale pattern of FPB-treated surfaces might contribute to the antibacterial performance. In this study, we applied FPB to stainless-steel surfaces and evaluated the antibacterial effects of the FPB-treated surfaces based on ISO 22,196:2007. The FPB-treated surfaces exhibited antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli, with an antibacterial activity value (R) of two or more. Furthermore, our experiments suggest that the antibacterial mechanism of the FPB-treated surface can be attributed to increased oxidative stress in bacteria owing to physical stress from the rough surface. The antibacterial effect of FPB-treated surfaces offers an effective measure against drug-resistant bacteria.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bee Products Chemical Analysis · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Kansai University
Ltd
Kanagawa Institute of Industrial Science and Technology
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet]. Centers for disease control and prevention (U.S.); National center for emerging zoonotic and infectious diseases (U.S.). Division of healthcare quality promotion. Antibiotic resistance coordination and strategy unit. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf
2. O’Neill J. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance [Internet]. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. [cited 2016 May 19]. Available from: https://www.biomerieuxconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Tackling-drug-resistant-infections-An-overview-of-our-work_LR_NOCROPS.pdf
3. 10.1002/smll.20120052810.1002/smll.201200528 ↗
4. 10.1038/ncomms383810.1038/ncomms3838 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.04610.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.046 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.01210.1016/j.fbp.2018.10.012 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0034810.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00348 ↗
8. 10.1186/2047-2994-3-2810.1186/2047-2994-3-28 ↗
9. 10.1039/c9ra08282d10.1039/c9ra08282d ↗
10. 10.1039/d1ra07623j10.1039/d1ra07623j ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.019 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.05.03810.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.05.038 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41598-018-28454-210.1038/s41598-018-28454-2 ↗
14. 10.1186/s13568-022-01351-810.1186/s13568-022-01351-8 ↗
15. 10.1039/c3nr02091f10.1039/c3nr02091f ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-020-15471-x10.1038/s41467-020-15471-x ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.190173011610.1073/pnas.1901730116 ↗
18. 10.1093/geronj/11.3.29810.1093/geronj/11.3.298 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.00210.1016/j.redox.2015.01.002 ↗
20. 10.1128/mr.55.4.561-585.199110.1128/mr.55.4.561-585.1991 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0133310.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01333 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0134010.1021/acsanm.8b01340 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.17310.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.173 ↗
24. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199823)43:3<338:AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-B10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199823)43:3<338:AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
25. 10.3314/jjmm.51.13110.3314/jjmm.51.131 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.11246310.1016/j.foodres.2023.112463 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10275410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102754 ↗
28. 10.1080/1064338890938835110.1080/10643388909388351 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11138210.1016/j.msec.2020.111382 ↗
30. 10.2355/tetsutohagane.93.5710.2355/tetsutohagane.93.57 ↗
31. 10.2355/isijinternational.48.129910.2355/isijinternational.48.1299 ↗
32. 10.4139/sfj.74.41210.4139/sfj.74.412 ↗
33. 10.1038/s42005-021-00739-510.1038/s42005-021-00739-5 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.01110.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.011 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.sna.2022.11391210.1016/j.sna.2022.113912 ↗
36. 10.1134/S107036322211021410.1134/S1070363222110214 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.10.02310.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.10.023 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00345-710.1016/S0168-1605(00)00345-7 ↗
39. 10.1128/AEM.56.11.3558-3564.199010.1128/AEM.56.11.3558-3564.1990 ↗
40. 10.4315/0362-028X-72.5.112110.4315/0362-028X-72.5.1121 ↗
41. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02024.x10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02024.x ↗
42. 10.1073/pnas.121966211010.1073/pnas.1219662110 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.fm.2023.10438310.1016/j.fm.2023.104383 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10096-017-2908-910.1007/s10096-017-2908-9 ↗