Quantitative analysis of {332}〈113〉 twinning in a Ti-15Mo alloy by in situ scanning electron microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
We have performed quantitative analysis of {332}113 twinning in a -Ti-15Mo (wt.%) alloy by in situ scanning electron microscopy and electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD). Microstructure-twinning relations were evaluated by statistical analysis of the evolving twin structure upon deformation at room temperature. Our analysis reveals that at the early stages of deformation ( < 1.5 to 2.0%), primary twinning is mainly determined by the applied macroscopic stress resolved on the twin system. Most of the primary twins (~70-80% of the analyzed twins) follow Schmid's law with respect to the macroscopic stress, and most of the growth twins (~ 85% of the analyzed twins) correspond to the higher stressed variant. In the grain size range studied here (40-120 m), we find that several twin parameters such as number of twins per grain and number of twins per grain boundary area exhibit grain size dependence. We ascribe these effects to the grain size dependence of twin nucleation stress and apparent critical resolved shear stress for twinning, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute for Materials Science , Tsukuba, Japan
Graduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba , Ibaraki, Japan
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-710.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
2. Narita N · 1992 · 135
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.04810.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.048 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00475-810.1016/S1359-6454(97)00475-8 ↗
5. 10.2320/matertrans1960.23.50710.2320/matertrans1960.23.507 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.04010.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.040 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0281482910.1007/BF02814829 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0265012210.1007/BF02650122 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10853-017-1032-710.1007/s10853-017-1032-7 ↗
10. 10.1098/rspa.1965.021610.1098/rspa.1965.0216 ↗
11. 10.1080/1478643031000161217510.1080/14786430310001612175 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-7 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.09.01610.1016/j.matchar.2016.09.016 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.10510.1016/j.msea.2016.01.105 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.03010.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.030 ↗
16. 10.1080/1478643100363083510.1080/14786431003630835 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.00410.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.004 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.005 ↗
19. 10.1080/1478643650822395310.1080/14786436508223953 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.03410.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.034 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.03710.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.037 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.027 ↗
23. 10.1080/1478643080243816810.1080/14786430802438168 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.01810.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.018 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10853-013-7140-010.1007/s10853-013-7140-0 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.12.05010.1016/j.msea.2009.12.050 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10853-016-9976-610.1007/s10853-016-9976-6 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.26710.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.267 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.01410.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.014 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.08110.1016/j.msea.2012.03.081 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.04410.1016/j.msea.2015.03.044 ↗
32. 10.2320/matertrans1989.33.12910.2320/matertrans1989.33.129 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.04810.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.048 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.01310.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.013 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.04210.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.042 ↗
36. Bieler TR · Mater. Sci · 2014 · 18 · 221
37. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.00910.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.009 ↗
38. Gutierrez-Urrutia I · Multistage strain hardening through dislocation substructure and twinning in a high strength and ductile weight-reduced Fe-Mn-Al-C steel. Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 5791
39. DeHoff RT · 1968
40. 10.1007/BF0265350110.1007/BF02653501 ↗
41. 10.1098/rspa.2009.066110.1098/rspa.2009.0661 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.02.00710.1016/j.jmps.2011.02.007 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.04410.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.044 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.02410.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.024 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.00510.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.005 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.496571910.1063/1.4965719 ↗
47. 10.1038/ncomms1382610.1038/ncomms13826 ↗