In Vacuo Scratching Yields Undisturbed Insight into the Bulk of Lithium-Ion Battery Positive Electrode Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Characterizing Li-ion battery (LIB) materials by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) poses challenges for sample preparation. This holds especially true for assessing the electronic structure of both the bulk and interphase of positive electrode materials, which involves sample extraction from a battery test cell, sample preparation, and mounting. Here, we introduce the method of in vacuo scratching as preparation for XPS measurements of LIB positive electrode materials, which can drastically reduce spectral contaminations and enhance spectral quality, enabling higher information gain. The benefits of this effective yet simple method are highlighted in comparison to Ar + -sputtering and air contact using commercially applied powder LiNi 1/3 Mn 1/3 Co 1/3 O 2 (NMC333) as showcase material. For assessing interphase formation, the electrode material was soaked in electrolyte, and the effects of rinsing and in vacuo scratching were studied. This treatment results in high signal-to-noise spectra, yielding well-defined photoelectron spectra without the influence of the interphases and spectral artifacts from, e.g., Ar + sputtering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Extraction and Separation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Surface Science Laboratory, Department of Materials and Geosciences, Technical University of Darmstadt, Peter-Grünberg-Straße 4, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Advanced Thin Film Technology, Department of Materials and Geosciences, Technical University of Darmstadt, Peter-Grünberg-Straße 2, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/D2TA03242B10.1039/D2TA03242B ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.19543110.1103/PhysRevB.82.195431 ↗
3. 10.1039/c3ta14509c10.1039/c3ta14509c ↗
4. 10.1021/cm504753410.1021/cm5047534 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00079-010.1016/S0257-8972(97)00079-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/0368-2048(91)85039-V10.1016/0368-2048(91)85039-V ↗
7. Moulder J. F. · 1992
8. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.02910.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.029 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14859910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148599 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.22310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.223 ↗
11. 10.1002/sia.512210.1002/sia.5122 ↗
12. 10.1116/6.000042110.1116/6.0000421 ↗
13. 10.1021/cm702546s10.1021/cm702546s ↗
14. 10.1007/s00216-008-2520-z10.1007/s00216-008-2520-z ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.11410.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.114 ↗
16. 10.1016/0039-6028(84)90068-210.1016/0039-6028(84)90068-2 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.01810.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.018 ↗
18. Groot F. de · 2008
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.609010.1103/PhysRevB.44.6090 ↗
20. 10.1039/D3TA05981B10.1039/D3TA05981B ↗
21. 10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/990335410.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/9903354 ↗
22. 10.1134/1.145101110.1134/1.1451011 ↗
23. 10.1116/1.124788810.1116/1.1247888 ↗
24. 10.1116/1.124788910.1116/1.1247889 ↗
25. 10.1016/0368-2048(89)80009-X10.1016/0368-2048(89)80009-X ↗
26. 10.1002/admi.20170056710.1002/admi.201700567 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.susc.2021.12189410.1016/j.susc.2021.121894 ↗