Differentiating between Ion Transport and Plating–Stripping Phenomena in Magnesium Battery Electrolytes Using Operando Raman Spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding metal plating–stripping and mass transport processes is necessary for the development of new electrolytes for post-lithium energy storage applications. Operando vibrational spectroscopy is a valuable analytical tool for this purpose, enabling structural and chemical changes at electrode–electrolyte interfaces to be probed dynamically, under battery cycling conditions. In this work we apply operando Raman spectroscopy to characterize the behavior of the Mg based “all phenyl complex” [Mg 2 Cl 3 ] + [AlPh 4 ] − in tetrahydrofuran (THF), an exemplar electrolyte for emerging Mg battery technologies. We demonstrate that the observed electrolyte Raman band intensities vary reversibly with electrochemical cycling due to anion migration in response to the applied electric field, while Mg plating and stripping can be monitored independently through the broad background scattering intensity. Spectral measurements across different sites of the platinum working electrode indicate that the ion transport response is spatially heterogeneous, while the plating and stripping response is ubiquitous.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
WestCHEM, Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, 295 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G1 1XL, United Kingdom
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aas979310.1126/science.aas9793 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.10018010.1016/j.xinn.2021.100180 ↗
3. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1310.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0042210.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00422 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0121910.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01219 ↗
6. 10.1039/c3ee40871j10.1039/c3ee40871j ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0038410.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00384 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22902710.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229027 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20200647210.1002/anie.202006472 ↗
10. 10.1021/cr500003w10.1021/cr500003w ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0172710.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01727 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat477710.1038/nmat4777 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c0284310.1021/acs.analchem.2c02843 ↗
14. 10.1039/D2CC03290B10.1039/D2CC03290B ↗
15. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac132d10.1149/1945-7111/ac132d ↗
16. 10.1002/aenm.20220250410.1002/aenm.202202504 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41586-021-04068-z10.1038/s41586-021-04068-z ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.1c2089310.1021/acsami.1c20893 ↗
19. 10.1021/ja109851210.1021/ja1098512 ↗
20. 10.1021/om061076s10.1021/om061076s ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0545210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05452 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.7b0808810.1021/acsami.7b08088 ↗
23. 10.1039/C4CC07621D10.1039/C4CC07621D ↗
24. Socrates G. · 2004
25. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0086710.1021/acsaem.0c00867 ↗
26. 10.1039/C7SC03191B10.1039/C7SC03191B ↗
27. 10.1039/D0SC02976A10.1039/D0SC02976A ↗
28. 10.1002/pssb.20210058910.1002/pssb.202100589 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0014610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00146 ↗
30. 10.1039/C9CP02430A10.1039/C9CP02430A ↗
31. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0112010.1021/acsenergylett.2c01120 ↗